Dynamic and Material Parameters in Brittle Fracture in Ceramics

  • P. J. Gielisse
  • A. Choudry
  • T. Kim
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR, volume 11)


Some years ago when searching for an explanation of the behavior of materials, specifically brittle materials, under impact loading we considered the potential for designing a model which would incorporate the system’s material properties as well as the impact dynamics. Our specific interests were directed towards the abrasive finishing or grinding process which is unique in that it requires consideration of the real time spatial stress distribution in a repetitive mode. Knowledge of this type is required in as much as it, directly or indirectly, relates to a wide variety of technologically inportant areas1-4; ballistic impact (armour), percussive wear, abrasive machining, two and three body polishing, grinding, erosion processes, general friction and wear, ultrasonic machining and rock excavation.


Brittle Fracture Force Level Crack Size Wheel Velocity Crack Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.L. Wilkins, C.F. Cline and C.A. Honodel, Light Armor, UCRL- 71817.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.G. Evans, M.E. Bulden, G.E. Eggum and M. Rosenblatt. Office of Naval Research N00014–75-C-0669 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.R. Curran, L. Seaman and D.A. Shockey, Dynamic Failure of Solids. Stanford Research Institute Report #001–76 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.A. Shockey, D.R. Curran, L. Seaman, J.T. Rosenberg and C.F. Petersen, Int. J. Rock. Mech. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 11, 303 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.C. Shaw, Mech. Chem. Eng. Trans. 8 (1), 73–78 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Broese van Groenou, N. Maan and J.D.B. Veldkanp, Philips Res. Repts., 30, 320–359 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. J.D.B. Veldkamp and R.J. Klein Wassink, Philips Res. Repts., 31 156–170 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    P.J. Gielisse, T.J. Kim and A. Choudry, An Experimental Investigation of the Dynamic and Thermal Characteristics of the Ceramic Stock Removal Process, in: Surfaces and Interfaces of Glass and Ceramics, V.D. Frechette et al. editors, 137–148 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    A. Choudry and P.J. Gielisse, Dynamic Elastic Model of Ceramic Stock Removal, Ibid., 149–166 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    P.J. Gielisse, T.J. Kim, A. Choudry, J.F. Short and E.J. Turker, Final Technical Report, N 00017–72-C-0202, Naval Air Systems Command, U.S. Navy, Washington, D.C. (1973).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    B. Steverding, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 52, 133 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    Timoshenko and Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw Hill, N.Y. (1956).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    F.M.A. Carpay and S. K. Kurtz, A Multiple-Lognormal Model of Normal Grain Growth, this volume.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    H.A. Nied and K. Arin, Fracture Mechanics Model, International Symposium on Fracture Mechanics, Penn. State Univ. July 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    L. Goyette, Effects of Grain size on Grinding Forces in Ceramic Processing, M.S. Thesis, University of Rhode Island (1974).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    M. Brandes, Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1, 56 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. See also, H.J.J. Kals and P.J. Gielisse, Annals C.I.R.P., 24 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    P.J. Gielisse and H.J.J. Kals to be published, see also second part reference 15.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    R.C. Leuth, Determination of Fracture Toughness Parameters for WC-Co Alloys, Thesis Michigan State University (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Gielisse
    • 1
  • A. Choudry
    • 1
  • T. Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations