Advertisement

Anharmonic Interference in Scattering Experiments

  • W. J. L. Buyers
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 35)

Abstract

Although deeply entrenched in the folklore of condensed matter physics the phonon concept is of limited validity. Even with the most direct technique for studying phonons, neutron inelastic scattering, it is not possible in principle to distinguish between the one-phonon response and the multiphonon background.

Keywords

Iterative Loop Reciprocal Lattice Point Kronig Relation Symmetric Scat Asymmetric Scattering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. Ambegaokar, J. Conway and G. Baym, “Lattice Dynamics” (Ed. R.F. Wallis) Pergamon, 1965, p. 261.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.J.L. Buyers and T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 150, 758 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.J.L. Buyers, J.D. Pirie and T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 165, 999 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    For figures see chapter by R.A. Cowley, or refs. 3,5,6,7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Melvin, J.D. Pirie and T. Smith, Phys. Rev. 175, 1085 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.A. Cowley and W.J.L. Buyers, J. Phys. C 2, 2262 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.A. Cowley, E.C. Svensson and W.J.L. Buyers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 525 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.R. Glyde, “Rare Gas Solids” (Eds. M.L. Klein, J.A. Venables) Academic, 1976, Vol. I, p. 382.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.A. Reese, S.K. Sinha, T.O. Brun and C.R. Tilford, Phys. Rev. A 3, 1688 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V.J. Minkiewicz, T.A. Kitchens, F.P. Lipschultz, R. Nathans and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. 174, 267 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.B. Osgood, V.J. Minkiewicz, T.A. Kitchens and G. Shirane, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1537 (1972); errata A 6, 526 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V.J. Minkiewicz, T.A. Kitchens, G. Shirane and E.B. Osgood, Phys. Rev. A 8, 1513 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V.F. Sears and F.C. Khanna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 549 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.K. McMahan and R.A. Guyer, “Low Temperature Physics — LT13”, Plenum, 1972, Vol. I, p. 110.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N.R. Werthamer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1102 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R.A. Cowley and A.D.B. Woods, Can. J. Phys. 49, 177 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.D.B. Woods, E.C. Svensson and P. Martel, Phys. Lett. 43A, 223 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 17a.
    See also E.C. Svensson, P. Martel, V.F. Sears and A.D.B. Woods, Can. J. Phys. 54, 2178 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 18.
    H. Horner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 537 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    H.R. Glyde, Can. J. Phys. 52, 2881 (1974).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    A.K. McMahan and H. Beck, Phys. Rev. A 8, 3247 (1973) show that Horner’s subsidiary peaks are enhanced by the sparseness of his mesh used for \(\vec q\) -space sums, and by his inclusion of V(3) within the iterative loop. The iterative procedure diverges for a V(3)/V(2) ratio slightly larger than that used by Horner.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 21.
    H. Horner, “Low Temperature Physics — LT13”, Plenum, 1972, Vol. 2, p. 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. L. Buyers
    • 1
  1. 1.Atomic Energy of Canada LimitedCanada

Personalised recommendations