Stereochemistry of Electrode Processes

  • L. G. Feoktistov


The present review has the aim of comparing available published data on the effect of stereochemical factors on the kinetics and mechanism of electrode reactions involving organic compounds and on the stereochemistry of the electrode reaction products, but setting aside the numerous data on steric hindrance of coplanarity in molecules caused by substituents. A considerable number of papers have now been published either completely or partially devoted to these topics, but the last attempt to generalize information about the effect of stereochemical factors on the polarographic behavior of organic compounds was made a fairly long time ago [1]; information on the stereochemistry of electrochemical reaction products has not been treated systematically at all.


Trans Isomer Fumaric Acid Electrode Process Electrolytic Reduction Diethyl Ester 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Yu. P. Kitaev and G. K. Budnikov, Usp. Khim., 31:670 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Herasymenko, Z. Elektrochem., 34:74 (1928).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Vopička, Coll. Czechosl. Chem. Comuns., 8:349 (1936).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Semerano and J. S. Rao, Mikrochem., 23:9 (1937).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Semerano, Mikrochem., 24:10 (1938).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. S. Rao, J. Univ. Bombay, 10:56 (1941).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. J. Elving and C. Teitelbaum, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 71:3916 (1946).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Warshowsky, P. J. Elving, and J. Mandel, Analyt. Chem., 19:161 (1947).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ya. P. Stradyn’, V. V. Teraud, and M. V. Shimanskaya, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 547 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. D. Kamyshchenko and I. V. Kudryashov, Trudy MKhTI im. D. I. Mendeleeva, 54:194 (1967).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. N. Nikulin and A. N. Shikin, Papers of Second Conference on Polarography [in Russian], Izd. Kazansk. Univ. (1962), p. 102.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. N. Nikulin, Thesis [in Russian], Kazan University (1964).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Kanakam, M. S. V. Pathy, and H. V. K. Udupa, Electrochim. Acta, 12:329 (1967).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. A. Korchinskii, Ukrainsk. Khim. Zh., 29:103 (1963).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Schwarz, Coll. Czechosl. Chem. Communs., 7:326 (1935).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Semerano and G. Sartori, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 68:167 (1938).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Semerano and G. Sartori, Mikrochem., 24:130 (1938).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maclntyre, King. Fed. Proc., 1:160 (1942).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Frenkl, Chem. Listy, 46:79 (1952).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. L. Markman and É. V. Zinkova, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 27:1438 (1957).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. L. Markman and É. V. Zinkova, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 32:353 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. J. Elving, I. Rosenthal, and A. J. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 77:5218 (1955).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    R. Takahashi and P. J. Elving, Electrochim. Acta, 12:213 (1967).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    F. Wessely and J. Wratil, Mikrochem., 32:248 (1947).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Wawzonek, E. W. Blaha, R. Berkey, and M. E. Runner, J. Electrochem. Soc., 102:235 (1955).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. E. Sioda, D. O. Cowan, and W. S. Koski, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 89:230 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    L. V. Shubina, L. Ya. Malkes, V. N. Dmitrieva, and V. D. Bezuglyi, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 37:437 (1967).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. P. Tomilov, S. K. Smirnov, I. G. Sevast’yanova, and O. G. Strukov, Zh. VKhO im. D. I. Mendeleeva, 12:357 (1967).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    W. Kemula and J. Kornacki, Roczn. Chem., 36:1849 (1962).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    J. P. Petrovich, J. D. Anderson, and M. M. Baizer, J. Org. Chem., 31:3897 (1966).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    H. Keller, R. A. Pasternak, and H. Halban, Helv. Chim. Acta, 29:512 (1946).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. A. Pasternak, Helv. Chim. Acta, 31:753 (1948).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Ryvolova, Coll. Czechosl. Chem. Communs., 22:1114 (1957).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    E. D. Hartneil and C. E. Bricker, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 70:3385 (1948).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    C. Prévost, P. Souchay, and J. Chauvelier, Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 5 (1951).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    J. Kuta, Science, 144:1130 (1964).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    S. G. Mairanovskii and L. D. Bergel’son, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 34:236 (1960).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. H. Jura and R. J. Gaul, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 80:5402 (1958).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    I. Rosenthal, J. R. Hayes, A. J. Martin, and P. J. Elving, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80:3050 (1958).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    P. J. Elving, I. Rosenthal, J. R. Hayes, and A. J. Martin, Analyt. Chem., 33:330 (1961).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    I. G. Markova and L. G. Feoktistov, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 38:970 (1968).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    A. Winkel and H. Siebert, Ber., 74B:670 (1941).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    W. M. Lauer, H. P. Klug, and S. A. Harrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 61:2775 (1953).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    G. Costa, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 83:875 (1953).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    C. Costa, Ricerca Sci., 27, Suppl. A. Polarographia, 3:94 (1957).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    C. Prévost, P. Souchay, and C. Mallen, Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 78 (1953).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Volpi, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 77:473 (1947).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    P. J. Hilson and P. B. Birnbaum, Trans. Faraday Soc, 48:478 (1952).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    B. Nygard, Arkiv. Kemi, 20:163 (1962).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    S. Wawzonek and J. D. Fredrickson, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 77:3985 (1955).Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    L. Chuang, I. Fried, and P. J. Elving, Analyt. Chem., 37:1528 (1965).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    C. R. Castor and J. H. Saylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 75:1427 (1953).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H. C. Freeman and W. P. Georgans, Chem. a. Ind., 148 (1951).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    N. Tyutyulkov, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 32:1389 (1958).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    P. Souchay and S. Ser, J. Chim. Phys., 49:C172 (1952).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    N. Tyutyulkov and S. Buduvoff, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulgar. Sci., 6:5 (1953).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    N. Tyutyulkov and W. Palikarov, Compt. Rend. Acad. Bulgar. Sci., 15:399 (1962).Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    H. Gardner and W. Georgans, J. Chem. Soc, 4180 (1956).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    H. Lund, Acta Chem. Scand., 13:249 (1959).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J. Nakaya, K. Mori, H. Kinoshita, and S. Ono, Nippon Kagaku Zasshi, 80:1212 (1959).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    E. Paspaleev, Monatsh. Chem., 97:230 (1966).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    A. E. Arbuzov and Yu. P. Kitaev, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 113:577 (1957).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Yu. P. Kitaev and A. E. Arbuzov, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Khim. Nauk, 1037(1957).Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    A. E. Arbuzov and Yu. P. Kitaev, Izv. Kazansk. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 3 (1957).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    R. Brockman and D. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 74:4128 (1952).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yu. P. Kitaev and G. K. Budnikov, Theory and Practice of Polarographic Analysis [in Russian], Izd. STIINCA, Kishinev (1962), p. 395.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yu. I. Vainshtein, V. M. Dziomko, K. A. Dunaevskaya, and M. D. Shirokova, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 32:2777 (1962).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    L. G. Feoktistov, in: Advances in Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966), p. 135.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    F. L. Lambert, A. H. Albert, and J. P. Hardy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86:3155 (1964).Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    J. W. Sease, P. Chang, and J. L. Groth, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 86:3154 (1964).Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    J. Krupička, J. Závada, and J. Sicher, Coll. Czechosl. Chem. Communs., 30:3570 (1965).Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    F. L. Lambert, J. Org. Chem., 31:4184 (1966).Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    L. G. Feoktistov, A. P. Tomilov, Yu. D. Smirnov, and M. M. Gol’din, Élektrokhimiya, 1:887 (1965).Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 31:337 (1957).Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 36:1895 (1962).Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 37:1025 (1963).Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    J. Závada, J. Krupička, and J. Sicher. Coll. Czechosl. Chem. Communs., 28:1664 (1963).Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 40:1717 (1966).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    D. Q. Quan, Compt. Rend., 251:2927 (1960).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    A. M. Wilson and N. L. Allinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 83:1999 (1961).Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    V. Delaroff, M. Bolla, and M. Legrand, Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 1912(1961).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    P. Kabasakalian and J. McGlotten, Analyt. Chem., 34:1440 (1962).Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    I. Rosenthal and P. J. Elving, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 73:1880 (1951).Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    M. G. McKeon, J. Electroanalyt. Chem., 3:402 (1962).Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    L. Malspeis and N. G. Hung, J. Pharmac. Sci., 53:506 (1964).Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    P. Zuman, Acta Chim. Hungar., 18:141 (1959).Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    P. Zuman and K. Černý, Chem. Listy, 52:1468 (1958).Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    T. Inoue, K. Koyama, T. Matsuoka, and S. Tsutsumi, Tetrahedron Letters, 1409 (1963).Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    S. Tsutsumi, K. Koyama, T. Inoue, T. Ebara, T. Tani, and S. Fukuoka, 17th Meeting C. I. T. C. E., Extended Abstracts, Tokyo (1966), p. 109.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    W. W. Paudler, R. E. Herbener, and A. G. Zeiler, Chem. a. Ind. (London), 47:1909 (1965).Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    H. J. Dauben, Jr., Liang Xiao-Tian, Acta Chim. Sinica, 25:129 (1959).Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    E. J. Corey, N. L. Bauld, R. T. LaLonde, J. Casanova, Jr., and E. T. Kaiser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 82:2645 (1960).Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    L. Eberson, Acta. Chem. Scand., 14:641 (1960).Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    E. J. Corey and J. Casanova, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 85:165 (1963).Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    P. G. Gassmann and F. V. Zalar, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 88:2252 (1966).Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    A. A. Humffray and L. F. G. Williams, Chem. Com., 24:616 (1965).Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    A. A. Ponomarev and I. A. Markushina, in: Advances in Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968), p. 80.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    W. J. Koehl, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86:4686 (1964).Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    C. Mettler, Ber., 39:2933 (1906).Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    K. N. Campbell and E. E. Young, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 65:965 (1943).Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    C. T. Camilli, Diss. Abs., XVII, 826 (1958).Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    I. Rosenthal, J. R. Hayes, A. J. Martin, and P. J. Elving, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 80:3050 (1958).Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    S. Wawzonek and D. Wearring, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 81:2067 (1959).Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    M. E. Peover, The Chem. Engineer, No. 211, Trans, of the Institution of Chem. Engineers, 45:CE192 (1967).Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    J. D. Anderson, M. M. Baizer, and J. P. Petrovich, J. Org. Chem., 31:3890 (1966).Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    J. Kato, M. Sakuma, and T. Yamada, J. Electrochem. Soc Japan, 25:331 (1957).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    L. G. Feoktistov and M. M. Gol’din, Élektrokhimiya, 4:490 (1968).Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 40:1727 (1966).Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 41:809 (1967).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    A. Cisak, Roczn. Chem., 41:963 (1967).Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    C. K. Mann, J. L. Webb, and H. H. Walborsky, Tetrahedron Letters, 2249 (1966).Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    R. Annino, R. E. Erickson, J. Michalovic, and B. McKay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88:4424 (1966).Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    B. Czochralska, Chem. Phys. Letters, 1:239 (1967).Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    P. Anziani, A. Anbry, and R. Cornubert, Compt. Rend., 225:878 (1947).Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    E. A. Parker and J. S. Swann, Trans. Electrochem. Soc, 92:343 (1947).Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    L. Mandeli, R. M. Powers, and R. A. Day, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc, 80:5284 (1958).Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    J. Grimshaw and J. S. Ramsey, J. Chem. Soc, 653 (1966).Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    H. Kaufmann, Z. Elektrochem., 4:461 (1898).Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    H. D. Law, J. Chem. Soc, 89:1512 (1906).Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    H. D. Law, J. Chem. Soc, 91:748 (1907).Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    H. D. Law, J. Chem. Soc, 99:1113 (1911).Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    J. Dewar and J. Read, J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.), 55:347 (1936).Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    M. J. Allen, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 72:3797 (1950).Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    I. A. Pearl, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 74:4260 (1952).Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    H. Lund, Acta Chem. Scand., 11:283 (1957).Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    P. Kabasa kalian, J. McGlotten, A. Basch, and M. D. Yudis, J. Org. Chem., 26:1738 (1961).Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    A. Vincenc-Chodkowska and Z. Grabowski, Fundamental Problems in Modern Theoretical Electrochemistry [in Russian], Mir, Moscow (1965), p. 390.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    E. Bauer, J. Electroanalyt. Chem., 14:351 (1967).Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    L. Horner and A. Mentrap, Ann., 646:65 (1961).Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    L. Horner, H. Fuchs, H. Winkler, and A. Rapp, Tetrahedron Lettters, 965 (1963).Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    L. Horner and H. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Letters, 1573 (1963).Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    G. S. Shapoval, E. M. Skobets, and N. P. Markova, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 173:392 (1967).Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    G. S. Shapoval, N. P. Markova, and E. M. Skobets, in: Advances in Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968), p. 71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Company Ltd. 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. G. Feoktistov

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations