Advertisement

Determination of Composition of Solid Solutions Using X-Ray Diffraction Techniques

  • Paul Cherin
Part of the Progress in Analytical Chemistry book series (PAC, volume 176)

Abstract

Although ordinarily a qualitative tool, x-ray diffraction techniques can be particularly powerful when dealing with continuous solid solutions. The very properties of the atoms that allow them to form these solutions often make it difficult to distinguish between them by chemical means. Even most physical analytical techniques have difficulty distinguishing among a physical mixture, a solid solution or a mixture of the two. This paper will be limited to substitutional solid solutions, where only two constituents are being altered. The principle behind the techniques to be discussed is based on the differences in effective atomic radii between the solvent atom and the substituting atom which results in an expansion or contraction of the lattice which is directly measurable. Several methods will be described which are particularly suited for investigating continuous solid solutions obeying Vegard’s Law. When Vegard’s Law is not obeyed, these methods can be suitably adjusted. Some of these methods can be extremely precise, permitting a determination of relative composition to 1 part in 109.

Keywords

Solid Solution Physical Mixture Mole Percent Substitutional Solid Solution Angle Reflection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. Warren, B. Averbach and B. Roberts, J. Appl. Phys. 22,1493 (1951).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Zen, American Mineralogist 41, 523 - 4 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. H. Wills, Proc. Royal Soc. A 309 281-96 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Propoviz, J. Appl. Cryst 4 240 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Taylor and H. Sinclair, Proc. Phys. Soc A ~, 126 (1945).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. B. Nelson and D. P. Riley, Proc. Phys. Soc A 57, 160 (1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Cherin, E. Lind and E. A. Davis, J. Electrochem. Soc. 117 233 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. L. Bond, Acta. Cryst. j, 814 (1960).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Hart, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 309, 281 (1969).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. K. Frevel, Analytical Chem. 42, 1583 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. W. Harrison and B. J. Curtis, Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 13 247 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Cherin, E. A. Davis and C. Bielan, Analytical Chem. 4o, 611 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Cherin
    • 1
  1. 1.Research & Engineering DivisionXerox CorporationRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations