Advertisement

Evidence Against Local Control of Intestinal Tissue Oxygenation by Myogenic Mechanisms

  • A. P. Shepherd
  • W. W. Pawlik
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 75)

Abstract

The proposed basis for the myogenic theory of local blood flow control is that vascular smooth muscle will actively contract if stretched by increased transmural pressure. Critical experiments to test the myogenic hypothesis have employed elevated venous pressure to raise transmural pressures in the microvasculature. In isolated loops of small bowel, elevated venous pressure has been reported to cause an increase in total resistance to blood flow (1). Subsequent studies of capillary filtration showed that the increase in resistance occurred on the precapillary side. Such resistance changes in response to elevated venous pressure are thought to result from a myogenic constriction of resistance vessels (2). In addition to resistance vessels, precapillary sphincters are thought to respond to elevated venous pressure. By measuring the rate of fluid filtration at various venous pressures, and by determining the isogravimetric capillary pressure with a stop-flow technique, Johnson (3) was able to calculate capillary filtration coefficients for small intestine. His study showed that, although the filtration rate increased with increased venous pressure as expected, the cal-cualted capillary filtration coefficients fell with increased venous pressure. The proposed mechanism to explain the reduction in capillary filtration coefficients was a myogenic constriction of precapillary sphincters in response to the increased venous pressure.

Keywords

Venous Pressure Oxygen Extraction Myogenic Response Washout Curve Capillary Filtration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, P. C. Myogenic nature of increase in intestinal vascular resistance with venous pressure elevation. Circ. Res. 7: 992–999, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, P. C. Effect of venous pressure on mean capillary pressure and vascular resistance in the intestine. Circ. Res. 16: 294–300, 1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, P. C. and K. M. Hanson. Capillary filtration in the small intestine of the dog. Circ. Res. 19:766–773, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shepherd, A. P. and H. J. Granger. Autoregulatory escape in the gut: A systems analysis. Gastroenterology 65:77–91, 1973.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shepherd, A. P., D. Mailman, T. F. Burks and H. J. Granger. Effects of norepinephrine and sympathetic stimulation on extraction of oxygen and 86Rb in perfused canine small bowel. Circ. Res. 33:166–174, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shepherd, A. P., D. Mailman, T. F. Burks and H. J. Granger. Sympathetic nervous control of intestinal O2 extraction. In: Oxygen Transport to Tissue, H. I. Bicher and D. F. Bruley, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, 1973, pp. 423–428.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Renkin, E. M. and S. Roseli. Influence of sympathetic adrenergic vasoconstrictor nerves on transport of diffusible solutes from blood to tissues in skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol. Scand. 54: 223–240, 1962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pawlik, W., D. Mailman, A. P. Shepherd, T. Burks and E. D. Jacobson. Effects of vasoconstrictors on mesenteric hemodynamics and oxygen consumption. Fed. Proc. 33:338, 1974 (abstract).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mortillaro, N. A. and A. E. Taylor. Interactions of the vascular, interstitial, and lymphatic systems in the cat intestine. The Physiologist 16:401, 1973 (abstract).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Shepherd
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. W. Pawlik
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyThe University of Texas Health Science CenterSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Institute of PhysiologyMedical AcademyKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations