Transfer of Mercury and Cadmium from Terrestrial to Aquatic Ecosystems

  • John W. Huckabee
  • B. G. Blaylock
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 40)


The ecological problems of toxic heavy metals have generated a progression of review articles from specialty journals to semipopular magazines to national news media (I), and inevitably the backlash has set in (2). Still, the ecological status of mercury and cadmium remains incompletely known. While many of the pollutive discharges of mercury and cadmium have been identified and assessed, the natural background concentrations of these elements in the environment due to release by weathering of rocks and volcanic events are not well understood.


Mercury Concentration Largemouth Bass Inorganic Mercury Microcosm Experiment Mercury Pollution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Huckabee, J. W. (1972), Bioscience, 22(6), 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borlaug, N. E. (1972), Bioscience, 22(1), 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wallace, R. A., Fulkerson, W., Shultz, W. D., and Lyon, W. S. (1971), Mercury in the Environment: The Human Element, USAEC Rpt. ORNL-NSF-EP-I, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harriss, R. C. (1971), Biological Conservation, 3(4), 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldschmidt, V. M. (1958), Geochemistry, London E. E.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pierce, A. P., Botbol, J. M., and Learned, R. E. (1970), Mercury content of rocks, soils, and stream sediments, Mercury in the Environment, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 713.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huckabee, J. W., Cartan, F. O., Kennington, G. S., and Franz, J. C. (1973), Bull, of Envir. Contam. and Toxicol., 9(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shacklette, H. T. (1970), Mercury in plants, Mercury in the Environment, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 713.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fulkerson, W. and Goel1er, H. E. (1973), Cadmium: The Dissipated Element, ORNL-NSF-EP-21, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huckabee, J. W., Mosses: Sensitive indicators of airborne mercury pollution, accepted for publication, Atmospheric Environment.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, G. F. (1953), Analytica Chimica Acta, 8, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feldman, C., Carter, J. A., and Bate, L. C. (1972), Environment, 14, 48.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joensuu, O. I. (1971), Science, 172, 1027–1028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bertine, K. K. and Goldberg, E. D. (1971), Science, 173, 233–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Billings, C. E. and Matson, W. R. (1972), Science, 176, 1232–1233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlesinger, M. D. and Schultz, H. (1971), Analysis for Mercury in Coal, Bureau of Mines, Managing Coal Wastes and Pollution Program, Technical Progress Report-43, Bureau of Mines, Pittsburth, PA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Gorman, J. V., Suhr, N. H., and Walker, P. L., Jr. (1972), Applied Spectroscopy, 26, 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matti, C. A., Cycling of 203Hg and 109Cd in an oldfield ecosystem for one growing season, M. S. Thesis, University of Tennessee, in preparation.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Witherspoon, J. P., unpublished data.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joint FAO/IAEA Coordination Meetings on Isotope Tracer Aided Studies of the Fate and Significance of Foreign Substances in (a) Food and (b) the Agricultural Environment, Ispra, Italy, Oct. 30-Nov. 10, 1972.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Witherspoon, J. P. and Gaskins, R., unpublished data.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huckabee, J. W. (1972), Mercury concentrations in fish from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, ORNL-TM-3908, Nov.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Espenshade, G. H. (1963), Geology of some copper deposits in North Carolina, Virginia, and Alabama, Geol. Ser. Bull. I 142-I, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jernelov, A. and Lann, H. (1972), Oikos, 22, 403–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zitko, V., Finlayson, B. J., Wildish, D. J., Anderson, J. M., and Kohler, A. C. (1971), J. Fish. Res. Bd. of Canada, 28(9), 1285–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gebhards, S., Cline, J. E., Shields, F., and Pearson, L. (1971), Mercury residue in Idaho fishes—1970, Environmental Monitoring in Idaho for Metallic Poisons Using the Materials Testing Reactor, Special Research Issue No. 2, J. Idaho Acad. of Sci.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    D’ltri, F. M., Annett, C., and Fast, A. W. (1971), Mar. Technol. Soc. J., 5(6), 10–14.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nelson, D. J., Kevern, N. R., Wilhm, J. L., and Griffith, N. A. (1969), Water Research, 3, 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elwood, J. W. and Nelson, D. J. (1972), Oikos, 23, 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Curlin, J. W. and Nelson, D. J. (1968), Walker Branch Watershed Project: Objectives, facilities, and ecological characteristics, ORNL-TM-227I.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Crutchfield, P. J. (1966), Nautilus, 79(3), 80–86.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnels, A. G., Westermark, T., Berg, W., Persson, P. E., and Sjostrand, B. (1967), Oikos, 18, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lofroth, G. (1970), Methyl mercury, Bull. No. 4 (2nd ed.), Ecological Research Committee, Swedish Natural Science Research Council, Sreavagen 166 VIII, 5–113 46 Stockholm.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nelson, N., ed. (1971), Environmental Research, 4, 1–69.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hannerz, L. (1968), Inst. Freshwater Research Drottingholm, 48, 120–176.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Westoo, G. (1966), Acta Chem. Scand., 20, 2131–2137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jensen, S. and Jernelov, A. (1969), Nature, 223, 753–754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wood, J. M., Kennedy, F. S., and Rosen, C. G. (1968), Nature, 220, 173–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Backstrom, J. (1969), Acta Pharm, et Toxicol., 27, 5–103.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Haga, Y., Haga, H., Hagino, T., and Kariya, T. (1970), Bull. Jap. Soc. of Scient. Fish., 36, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McKone, C. E., Young, R. G., Bache, C. A., and Lisk, D. J. (1971), Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 1138–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beveridge, J. M. R. (1947), J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 7, 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hughes, W. L. (1957), Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 65, 454–460.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Huckabee
    • 1
  • B. G. Blaylock
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeUSA

Personalised recommendations