Energy and Tissue Fuel in Human Injury and Sepsis

  • John M. Kinney
  • Frank E. Gump
  • Calvin L. Long
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 33)


The loss of body weight has been a prominent feature of the response to injury or sepsis since the earliest clinical descriptions of these conditions. It was evident that the extent of weight loss tended to parallel the magnitude of the injury or sepsis. Subsequent observations revealed that the degree of weight loss is largest in males, younger adults, well-muscled individuals, and those with good previous nutrition. The weight loss is less in the female, the elderly, the poorly muscled, the nutritionally depleted. However, the underlying alterations in energy requirements and tissue fuel associated with injury and sepsis remain incompletely understood and are the subject of this discussion.


Caloric Expenditure Specific Dynamic Action Urea Synthesis Oxygen Difference Urea Excretion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kinney, J.M. In Symposium on Protein Metabolism: Influence of Growth Hormone, Anabolic Steroids and Nutrition in Health and Disease (F. Gross, ed.) p.275. Springer, Berlin, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cuthbertson, D.P. (1932) Biochem.J. 25, 233.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kinney, J.M., Duke, J.H.Jr., Long, C.L. & Gump, F.E. (1970) J. Clin. Path, 23, (Sappl 4) 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlson, L.A. Mobilization and utilization of lipids after trauma: relation to caloric homeostasis. Ciba Foundation Symposium. In Energy Metabolism in Trauma (R. Porter & J. Knight eds) p.155. J. & A. Churchill, London 1970.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cairnie, A.B., Campbell, R.M., Cuthbertson, D.P. & Pullar, J.D. (1957) Brit.J. exp. Path. 38, 504.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoner, H.B. (1969) Postgrad Med.J. 45, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell, R.M. & Cuthbertson, D.P. (1967) Quart. J. exp. Physiol. 52, 114.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kinney, J.M. & Roe, C.F. (1962) Ann. Surg. 156, 610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roe, C.F. & Kinney, J.M. (1965) Ann. Surg. 161, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Long, C.L., Spencer, J.L., Kinney, J.M. & Geiger, J.W. (1971) J. Appl. Physiol. 31, 102.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Canili, G.F. Jr. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Long, C.L., Spencer, J.L., Kinney, J.M. & Geiger, J.W. (1971) J. Appl. Physiol. 31, 110.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Canili, G.F. Jr. (1970) New Eng. J. Med. 282, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Myers, J.D. (1954) In Shock and Circulatory Homeostasis (H.D. Green, ed.) p. 121. Madison Printing Co. Inc., Madison, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gump, F.E., Price, J.B.Jr. & Kinney, J.M. (1970) Am. Surg. 171, 321.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gump, F.E., Price, J.B.Jr. & Kinney, J.M. (1970) Surg. Gynec. Obstet, 130, 23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • John M. Kinney
    • 1
  • Frank E. Gump
    • 1
  • Calvin L. Long
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations