Radiation Probes of Maize Meristems

  • H. H. Smith
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 18)

Abstract

This paper reviews ways that irradiation of dry seeds in maize can be used to gain information about the stem apex and leaf primordia. For the most part the experiments were originally designed to investigate the biological effectiveness of different kinds of radiation; however, they are discussed here as a means of elucidating properties of meristems. Deuteron microbeam experiments were carried out to study the effect of irradiating only specific parts of the dormant embryo, rather than the whole seed. This was accomplished with a deuteron beam of sufficiently narrow width to localize the irradiation.16 As a consequence, a particular region, primordium or meristematic area could be marked in the embryo by the damage produced or the mutations induced, then traced by effects observed in the developed seedling. The purpose of reporting experiments on comparative responses to x rays vs. neutrons in the context of this conference is to call attention to the consistent and quantitatively predictable performance of the meristem during recovery from various levels of genetic damage inflicted by two different radiation probes of the seed embryo. Observations showing different radiation sensitivities for different embryonic leaves were used to analyze differences in size of nuclei and constituent chromosomal segments in leaf primordial cells.

Keywords

Maize Graphite Hydrate Chlorophyll Platinum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baker, C. P., Curtis, H. J., Zeman, W. and Woodley, R. G. (1961) The design and calibration of a deuteron microbeam for biological studies. Radiation Res. 15: 489–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, M. D. (1970) Natural variation in nuclear characters of meristems in Vicia faba. Chromosoma 29: 317–335.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennett, M. D. and Rees, H. (1969) Induced and developmental variation in chromosomes of meristematic cells. Chromosoma 27: 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biavati, M. H., Rosenzweig, W., Rossi, H. H. and Miyanaga, I. (1963) The dependence of RBE on the energy of fast neutrons. III. Evaluations of radiation quality. Radiation Res. 19: 512–525.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delihas, N. and Curtis, H. J. (1958) The relative biological effectiveness of fission neutrons for the production of acute mortality in mice. Radiation Res. 8: 166–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirono, Y., Smith, H. H., Lyman, J., Thompson, K. and Baum, J. (1970) Relative biological effectiveness of heavy ions in producing mutations, tumors, and growth inhibition in the crucifer plant, Arabidopsis. Radiation Res. 44: 204–223.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagl, W. (1970) Temperature-dependent functional structures in the polytene chromosomes of Phaseolus, with special reference to the nucleolus organizers. J. Cell Sci. 6: 87–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rhoades, M. M. (1950) Meiosis in maize. J. Heredity 41: 59–67.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rossi, H. H. (1966) Microdosimetry. IAEA Tech. Report Ser. 58: 81–95.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schultz, J. (1965) Genes, differentiation and animal development. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 8: 116–147.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schwartz, D. and Bay, C. E. (1956) Further studies on the reversal in seedling height dose curve at very high levels of ionizing radiations. Amer. Naturalist 90: 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, H. H. (1967) Relative biological effectiveness of different types of ionizing radiations: cytogenetic effects in maize. Radiation Res., Suppl. 7: 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, H. H. (1971) Comparative genetic effects of different physical mutagens in higher plants. IAEA/FAO, Induced Mutations in Plant Improvement (Buenos Aires, 1970) (In press).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, H. H., Bateman, J. L., Quastler, H. and Rossi, H. H. (1964) RBE of monoenergetic fast neutrons: cytogenetic effects in maize. In: Biological Effects of Neutron and Proton Irradiations, Vol. II, pp. 233–248, IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, H. H., Cmbatti, N. C. and Rossi, H. H. (1968) Response of seeds to irradiation with x rays and neutrons over a wide range of doses. IAEA Tech. Report Ser, 92: 3–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, H. H., Curtis, H. J., Woodley, R. G. and Stein, O. L. (1962) The deuteron microbeam as a tool in botanical research. Radiation B. tany 1: 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, H. H. and Rossi, H. H. (1966) Energy requirements and relative biological effectiveness for producing a cytogenetic phenomenon in maize by irradiating seeds with x rays and monoenergetic neutrons. Radiation Res. 28: 302–321.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, H. H. and Rossi, H. H. (1970) Relation between mutation yield and cell lethality over a wide range of x ray and fission neutron doses in maize. IV Intern. Congr. Radiation Res., Evian, p. 202 (abstract).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, H. H., Rossi, H. H. and Kellerer, A. (In preparation).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sparrow, A. H. (1965) Relationship between chromosome volume and radiation sensitivity in plant cells. In: Cellular Radiation Biology, pp. 199–222, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steffensen, D. M. (1968) A reconstruction of cell development in the shoot apex of maize. Amer. J. Botany 55: 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stein, O. L. and Steffensen, D. M. (1959) The activity of x-rayed apical meristems: a genetic and morphogenetic analysis in Zea mays. Z. Vererbungslehre 90: 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stein, O. L. and Steffensen, D. M. (1959) Radiation-induced markers in the study of leaf growth in Zea. Amer. J. Botany 46: 485–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. H. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentBrookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations