Advertisement

Macrophage Recognition Mechanisms: Clinical and Experimental Considerations

  • N. R. Di Luzio
  • J. C. Pisano
  • N. K. Salky
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 15)

Abstract

Phagocytosis is an active process dependent upon both cellular activity (1–4) and humoral recognition factors (HRF) (5–10). The latter are essential for the expression of the discriminative actions of macrophages. Alterations in either the cellular or humoral components of the RES manifest themselves in altered intravascular clearance of colloidal materials (7,8,11,12). In addition to altered intravascular clearance rates, depression of reticuloendothelial (FE) function, by either alterations of cellular activity or depletion of HRF, is also associated with a decreased production of humoral antibodies (13,14) and cellular transplant reactions (15). Conversely, RES stimulation is associated with increased humoral (16) and cellular immunity (15). It is clear from these and other studies that the RES constitutes the afferent limb of the immune response.

Keywords

Kupffer Cell Lipid Emulsion Liver Slice Normal Human Serum Human Alveolar Macrophage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reed, P. W. and Tepperman, J.: Phagocytosis-associate. metabolism and enzymes in the rat polymorphonuclear leukocyte. Am. J. Physiol. 216:233, 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sbarra, A. J. and Karnovsky, M. L.: Th. biochemical basis of phagocytosis. I. Metabolic changes during the ingestion of particles by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 234:1355, 1959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Selvaraj, R. J. and Sbarra, A. J.: Relationshi. of glycolytic and oxidative metabolism to particle entry and destruction in phagocytizing cells. Nature 211:1272, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Selvaraj, R. J. and Sbarra, A. J.: Phagocytosi. inhibition and reversal. II. Possible role of pyruvate as an alternative source of energy for particle uptake by guinea pig leukocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 127:159, 1966.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyden, S.: Cellula. recognition of foreign matter. Int. Rev. Exptl. Pathol. 2:311, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pisano, J. C. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Purification of an opsonic protein fraction from rat serum. J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 7:386–396, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pisano, J. C., Patterson, J. T. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Reticuloendothelia. blockade: Effect of puromycin on opsonin-dependent recovery. Science. 162:565, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saba, T. M. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Reticuloendothelia. blockade and recovery as a function of opsonic activity. Am. J. Physiol. 216:197, 1969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tullis, J. L. and Surgenor, D. M.: Phagocytosis-promotin. factor of plasma and serum. Ann.N.Y. Acad. Sci. 66:386, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaughan, R. B.: Th. discriminative behaviour of rabbit phagocytes. Brit. J. Exptl. Pathol. 46:71, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wooles, W. R. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Th. phagocytic and proliferative response of the reticuloendothelial system following glucan administration. J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 1:160, 1964.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morrow, S. A. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Th. fate of foreign red cells in mice with altered reticuloendothelial function. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 119:647, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sabet, T., Newlin, C., and Friedman, H.: Th. effect of RES blockade on cellular antibody formation to sheep erythrocytes. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. and Med. 128:274, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Di Luzio, N. R. and Wooles, W. R.: Depressio. of phagocytic activity and immune response by methyl palmitate. Am. J. Physiol. 206:939, 1964.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Di Luzio, N. R.: Evaluatio. by the graft-versus-host reaction of the immune competence of lymphoid cells of mice with altered reticuloendothelial function. J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 4:459, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wooles, W. R. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Reticuloendothelia. function and the immune response. Science. 142:1078, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grace, J. T. and Kondo, T.: Investigation. of host resistance in cancer patients. Ann. Surg. 148:633, 1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krant, M. J., Manskopf, G., Brandrup, C. S. and Madoff, M.A.: Immunologi. alterations in bronchogenic cancer. Cancer. 21:623, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hughes, L. E. and Mackay, W. O.: Suppressio. of the tuberculin response in malignant disease. Brit. Med. J. 5474:1346, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Movat, M. Z., Vriuhara, T., Taichman, N. S., Roswell, H.C. and Mustard, J. F.: The role of PMN-leucocyte lysosomes in tissue injury, inflammation, and hypersensitivity. VI. The participation of the PMN-leucocyte and the blood platelet in systemic aggregate anaphylaxis. Immunol. 14:637, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kauffman, H. M., Humphrey, L. J., Hanback, L. D., Davis, F., Madge, G. E. and Rittenberg, M. S.: Inhibitio. of the afferent arc of the renal homograft response with a reticuloendothelial depressant. Transplantation. 5:1217, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stern, K.: Investigation. on the reticuloendothelial function of cancer patients. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 26:809, 1941.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Donovan, A. J.: Reticuloendothelial function in patients with cancer, Amer. J. Surg. 114:230, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salky, N. K., Di Luzio, N. R., Levin, A. G. and Goldsmith, H. S.: Phagocyti. activity of the reticuloendothelial system in neoplastic disease. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 70:393, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saba, T. M. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Kupffe. cell phagocytosis and metabolism of a variety of particles as a function of opsonization. J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 2:437, 1965.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bennett, B., Old, L. J. and Boyce, E. A.: The phagocytosis of tumor cells in vitro. Transplantation. 2:183, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pisano, J. C., Salky, N. K. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Inabilit. of plasma from neoplastic patients to support macrophage recognition of foreignness. Nature. 226:1049, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saba, T. M., Filkins, J. P. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Properties of the opsonic system regulating in vitro hepatic phagocytosis. J. Reticuloendothelial Soc. 3:398, 1966.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pisano, J. C., Filkins, J. P. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Phagocyti. and metabolic activities of isolated rat Kupffer cells. Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med. 128:917, 1968.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Forman, M. L. and Stiehm, E. R.: Impaire. opsonic activity but normal phagocytosis in low-birth-weight infants. New Eng. J. Med. 281:926, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miller, M. E., Seals, J., Kaye, R. and Levitsky, L. C.: A familial, plasma-associated defect of phagocytosis. Lancet. 1:60, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hektoen, L.: O. the specificity of opsonins in normal serum. J. Infect. Dis. 2:249, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kelin, G.: Tumor-specific transplantation antigens. Cancer Res. 28:625, 1968.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buttle, G. A. H., Eperon, J. L. and Kovacs, E.: A. antigen in malignant and in embryonic tissues. Nature. 194:780, 1962.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    HattlerJr., B. and Amos, B.: The immunobiology of cancer: Tumor antigens and the responsiveness of the host. Mongraphs Surg. Sci. 3:1, 1966.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cawein, M. J. and Sydnor, K. L.: Suppression of cellular activity in the reticuloendothelial system of the rat by 7, 12-dimethylbenz (2) anthracene. Cancer Res. 28:320, 1968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rigby, P. G.: Th. delay of allograft rejection by “tumor” ribonucleic acid. Transplantation. 7:142, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sheagren, J. H., Block, J. B. and Wolff, S. M.: Reticuloendothelia. system phagocytic function in patients with Hodgkins disease. J. Clin. Invest. 46:855, 1967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saba, T. M. and Di Luzio, N. R.: Surgica. stress and reticuloendothelial function. Surgery. 64:802, 1969.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kelly, L. S., Dobson, E. L., Finney, C. R. and Hirsch, D.: Proliferatio. of the reticuloendothelial system in the liver. Am. J. Physiol. 198:1134, 1960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Di Luzio, N. R., Salky, N. K., Riggi, S. J. and Ladman, A.J.: Experimental and clinical evaluation of reticuloendothelial function by means of a specific lipid emulsion. Proc. IV Int. Symp. R.E.S., p. 389, 1965.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zeidman, I.: Metastasis. A review of recent advances. Canc. Res. 17:157, 1957.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Southam, C. M., Moore, A. E. and Rhoads, C. P.: Homotransplantatio. of human cell lines. Science. 125:158, 1957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Levin, A. G., Custodeo, D. B., Mandel, E. E. and Southam, C. M.: Rejectio. of cancer homotransplants by patients with debilitating non-neoplastic diseases. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 120:410, 1964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. R. Di Luzio
    • 1
  • J. C. Pisano
    • 1
  • N. K. Salky
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyTulane University School of MedicineNew OrleansUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineUniversity of Tennessee Medical UnitsMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations