Immunologic Restoration of X-Irradiated Spleen by Repopulation with Circulating Lymphocytes

  • Miroslav M. Simić
  • Milica Z. Petrović
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 5)


In previous reports [1, 2, 3, 4] it has been shown that heavy local X-irradiation of the spleen, which in the rat is the main site of hemolysin synthesis, totally destroys the immunocompetent lymphoid tissue. The irradiated spleen, however, when antigen is injected intravenously just prior to irradiation, has rapid and complete restoration of its hemolysin-forming capability due to repopulation with immunocompetent cells. The reticuloendothelial cellular structures of the spleen, which survive irradiation, most probably play an essential role in this restoration because they serve as framework for repopulating lymphoid cells and because they store the injected antigen. Serologically, restoration is manifested by the appearance of a normal (i.e., optimal) hemolysin response that is only delayed for about 2 days. Histologic studies [2] indicate that the immunologic recovery is probably due to repopulation with circulating lymphocytes, but such evidence cannot be entirely conclusive.


Germinal Center Marginal Sinus Peak Titer Large Lymphocyte Differentiative Potentiality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. M. Simić, V. S. Sljivić, M. Z. Petrović, and D. M. Ćirković, Bull. Boris Kidric Inst. Nucl. Sci. (Beograd), 16 (Suppl. 1):1, 1965.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. M. Simic and M. Z. Petrovic, in: H. Cottier, N. Odartchenko, R. Schindler and C. C Congdon, Eds., Germinal Centers in Immune Responses, p. 240. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. M. Simic and M. Z. Petrovic, in: Z. M. Bacq, A. Castermans, and G. Lejeune, Eds., Cell-Bound Immunity with Special Reference to Anti-Lymphocyte Serum and Immunotherapy of Cancer, p. 39. Liège: Université de Liège, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. M. Simic and M. Z. Petrovic, in: Radiation and the Control of Immune Response, p. 21. Vienna: I. A. E. A. Panel Proceedings Series, 1968.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Knight, N. R. Ling, S. Sell, and C. E. Oxnard, Immunology 9:565, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. K. Jerne, A. A. Nordin, and C. Henry, in: B. Amos and H. Koprowsky, Eds., Cell-Bound Antibodies, p. 109. Philadelphia: Wistar Institute Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. D. McGregor, P. J. McCullagh, and J. L. Gowans, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), Ser. B, 168:229, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroslav M. Simić
    • 1
  • Milica Z. Petrović
    • 1
  1. 1.Boris Kidric Institute of Nuclear Sciences and Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeYugoslavia

Personalised recommendations