Advertisement

Mössbauer Isomer Shifts of the 6.2-keV Gamma Rays of Tantalum-181

  • G. Kaindl
  • D. Salomon
  • G. Wortmann

Abstract

In attempting to improve the resolution of the Mössbauer method considerable attention has been devoted to the few potential Mössbauer resonances with lifetimes in the microsecond region [1–4]. It has been shown recently, that in particular the 6.2-keV gamma transltion of Ta-181 (T1/2 = 6.8 μs) warrants great promise for high-resolution Mössbauer studies of hyperfine interactions. This is true for magnetic-dipole and electric-quadrupole hyperfine interactions as well as for isomer shifts [5–12].

Keywords

Isomer Shift Hyperfine Interaction Impurity Atom Temperature Shift Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. de Waard and G. J. Perlow, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 566 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. A. Steyert, R. D. Taylor, and E. K. Storms, Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 739 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Sauer, E. Matthias, and R. L. Mössbauer, Phys. Rev. Letters 21, 961 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Sauer, Z. Physik 222, 439 (1969); and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Perspectives in Mössbauer Effect Spectroscopy, S. G. Cohen and M. Pasternak, eds., Plenum Press, New York (1973), in print.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, University of California, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report UCRL-20426, 215 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Phys. Letters 42A, 333 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Kaindl, D. Salomon, and G. Wortmann, Phys. Rev. Letters 28, 952 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Phys. Letters 40A, 179 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 17, 681 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Wortmann, Phys. Letters 35A, 391 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. Kaindl, D. Salomon, and G. Wortmann, submitted to Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Kaindl, M. R. Maier, H. Schaller, and P. Wagner, Nucl. Instr. Methods 66, 277 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Wortmann, PhD Thesis, Techrusche Universität München (1971).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Salomon, PhD Thesis, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-1276 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. T. Trammel and J. P. Hannon, Phys. Rev. 180, 337 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu. M. Kagan, A. M. Afanasev, and V. K. Vojtovetskii, Soviet Physics JETP Letters 9, 91 (1969).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Phys. Letters 32B, 364 (1970).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, submitted to Phys. Rev. Letters.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. D. Taylor and E. K. Storms, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 14, 836 (1969).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. M. Quaim, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 90, 1065 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Wortmann, unpublished results (1973).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. Window, G. Longworth, and C. E. Johnson, J. Phys. C: Solid St. Phys. 3, 2156 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. H. Muir, Jr., K. J. Ando, and H. M. Coogan, Mössbauer Effect Data Index 1958–1965 Interscience Publsihers, New York (1966).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Kaindl and D. Salomon, Proc. International Conference on Applications of the Mössbauer Effect, Israel (1972).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Wortmann, P. E. Wagner, and G. M. Kalvius, Proc. International Conference on Applications of the Mössbauer Effect, Israel (1972).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Wortmann, F. E. Wagner, and G. M. Kalvius, Phys. Letters 42A, 483 (1973).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    G. K. Shenoy and G. M. Kalvius, Hyperfine Interactions in Excited Nuclei, G. Goldring and R. Kalish, eds., Gordon and Breach, New York (1971), p. 1201.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    X. A. da Silva, A. A. Gomes, and J. Danon, Phys. Rev. B4, 1161 (1971).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. G. Gelatt and H. Ehrenreich, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 18, 93 (1973).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. L. Ruby and G. K. Shenoy, Phys. Rev. 186, 326 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    G. Kaindl, D. Kucheida, W. Potzel, F. E. Wagner, U. Zahn, and R. L. Mössbauer, Hyperfine Interactions in Excited Nuclei, G. Goldring and R. Kalish, eds., Gordon and Breach, New York (1971), p. 595.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. B. Mann, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, University of California, private communication (1970–1972).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Blomquist, B. Ross, and M. Sundbom, J. Chem. Phys. 55, 141 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    L. W. Panek and G. J. Perlow, Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-7631 (1969).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    L. D. Roberts, D. O. Patterson, J. O. Thomson, and R. P. Levey, Phys. Rev. 179, 656 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    W. Potzel, P. E. Wagner, R. L. Mössbauer, G. Kaindl, and H. E. Seltzer, Z. Physik 241, 179 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    H. Micklitz and P. H. Barrett, Phys. Rev. Letters 28, 1547 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, Jr., Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 274 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    R. V. Pound, G. B. Benedek, and R. Drever, Phys. Rev. Letters 7, 405 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    R. S. Preston, S. S. Hanna, and J. Heberle, Phys. Rev. 128, 2207 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    W. A. Steyert and R. D. Taylor, Phys. Rev. 134, A716 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    G. M. Rothberg, S. Guimard, and N. Benczer-Koller, Phys. Rev. B1, 136 (1970).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    B. D. Josephson, Phys. Rev. Letters 4, 341 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    R. D. Taylor and E. K. Storms, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 14, 836 (1969).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R. M. Housley and P. Hess, Phys. Rev. 164, 340 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D. I. Bolef, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 100 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    P. H. Peatherston and J. R. Neighbours, Phys. Rev. 130, 1324 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    R. V. Kasovski and L. M. Palicov, Phys. Rev. Letters 22, 1001 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© New England Nuclear Corporation 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kaindl
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. Salomon
    • 1
  • G. Wortmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Physik-DepartmentTechnische Universität MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations