Advertisement

Ionic Conductivity of Doped Cerium Dioxide

  • H. L. Tuller
  • A. S. Nowick
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR, volume 9)

Abstract

The oxides most commonly considered to be good ionic conductors via oxygen-ion migration are ZrO2 and ThO2 doped with lower-valent cations, notably ZrO2:CaO (called calcia stabilized zirconia, or CSZ) and ThO2:Y2O3 (called yttria doped thoria, or YDT). In these materials, which have the fluorite structure, vacancies are introduced on the oxygen sublattice to compensate for the lower-valent cations, one vacancy for each Ca2+ or for each two Y3+ ions. Another oxide of the fluorite structure that has been well studied is CeO2, but it differs from the other two in that it undergoes large departures frem stoichioraetry in the direction of oxygen deficiency (CeO2-x) when heated in a reducing atmosphere. The oxygen vacancies thus formed are accompanied by electrons, and the material then displays n-type semiconducting properties [1]. This behavior of CeO2 is undoubtedly related to the existence of a stable Ce2O3 phase, i.e. to the fact that cerium readily goes into the 3+ state. Because of this tendency to become non-stoichicmetric, doped CeO2 is not often considered as a possible solid oxide-ion electrolyte when applications to oxygen concentration cells [2] or fuel cells [3] are under consideration.

Keywords

Oxygen Vacancy Ionic Conductivity Ideal Solution Fluorite Structure Cerium Dioxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P. Kofstad, “Nonstoicchiometry, Diffusion, and Electrical Conductivity in Binary Metal Oxides,” Wiley-Interscience, New York (1972),Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Goto and W. Pluschkell, in “Physics of Electrolytes” (J. Hladik, ed.) Vol. 2, p. 540, Academic Press, London (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Weissbart and R. Ruka, in “Fuel Cells” (G.J. Young, ed.) Vol. II, Chapter 4, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York (1963).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L.D. Yushina and S.F. Pal’guev, in “Electrochemistry of Molten and Solid Electrolytes” (M. Smirnov, ed.) Vol. 2, p. 74, Consultants Bureau, New York (1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Takahashi, in “Physics of Electrolytes” (J. Hladik, ed.) Vol. 2, p. 989, Academic Press, London (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F.A. Kroger and H.J. Vink, Solid State Physics 3, 310 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.W. Patterson, J. Electrochem. Soc. 118, 1033 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.N. Blumenthal, F.S. Brugner and J.E. Gamier, J. Electrochem. Soc. 120, 1230 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.E. Carter and W.L. Roth, in “Electromotive Force Measurements in High Temperature Systems” (C.B. Alcock, ed.) p. 141, Anerican Elsevier, N.Y. (1968).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.L. Taller and A.S. Nowick, J. Electrochem. Soc., to be published.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.D. Kingery, J. Pappis, M.E. Doty and D.C. Hill, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 42, 393 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. L. Tuller
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. S. Nowick
    • 1
  1. 1.Henry Krumb School of MinesColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentThe TechnionHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations