Advertisement

Evidence of Inverted Undercutting of a Solid Metal Substrate by a Liquid Ceramic Sessile Specimen at Elevated Temperatures

  • L. D. Lineback
  • LeRoy HoenycuttIII
  • C. R. Manning
  • K. L. Moazed
Part of the Materials Science Research book series (MSR, volume 7)

Abstract

When a drop of liquid is placed on a solid substrate, a metastable configuration, illustrated in Fig. 1, is often achieved instantaneously. This configuration may be maintained for a very long period of time, if the temperature is substantially below the melting point of the solid. This configuration is only an approximation of the final equilibrium state, because the surface free energy vectors do not balance. However, as θ decreases toward zero the approximation becomes closer. As the magnitude of the vector Glv decreases relative to Gls and Gsv, once again, the approximation becomes closer. As we approach the melting point of the solid, mass transport in it becomes measureable, and the rate of achieving equilibrium becomes much greater.

Keywords

Surface Tension Contact Angle Solid Substrate Liquid Drop Sessile Drop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moazed, K. L., “The Application of the Theory of Heterogeneous Nucleation to Epitaxy”, in The Use of Thin Films in Physical Investigations, J. C. Anderson ed., Academic Press (1966).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hodkin, E. N., Nicholas, M. G. and Poole, D. M., “The Surface Energies of Solid Molybdenum, Niobium, Tantalum, and Tungsten,” J. Less Common Metals 20(1) 93–103 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avraamov, Y. S. and Grozdev, A. G., “Calculation of the Surface Energy of Metals with a Body-Centered Cubic Lattice,” Fiz. Metal Metalloved, 23(3), 405–8 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zudremkin, S. N., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Otd. Tekhn. Nauk Met. i Toplivo 1, 55 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rasmussen, J. J. and Nelson, R. P., “Surface Tension and Density of Molten Alumina,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54(8) 398–401 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kingery, W. D., “Surface Tension of Some Liquid Oxides and Their Temperature Coefficients,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 42(1) 6–10 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartlett, R. W. and Hall, J. K., “Wetting of Several Solids by Al2O3 and BeO Liquids,” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 44(5) 444–48 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wartenburg, H. V., Wehner, G. and Saran, E., “The Surface Tension of Molten Al2O3 and La2O3,” Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen, Jahryesber, Math-physik. Kl., Fachgruppen II [N. F.] 2, 65–71 (1936).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sokolov, O. K., “Surface Tension of Melts,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Met. Gorn. Delo 4 59–64 (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. D. Lineback
    • 1
  • LeRoy HoenycuttIII
    • 1
  • C. R. Manning
    • 1
  • K. L. Moazed
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations