The Use of EDX for Fragile and Refractory Objects

  • J. F. Hanlan
Part of the Developments in Applied Spectroscopy book series (DAIS, volume 10)


The Chairman and other speakers of this session have discussed the problems of adequate sampling of cultural objects. Serious restrictions are placed on the analyst as regards both sample size and location since the object cannot be defaced or altered in any irreversible way. The objects are unique, frequently of uncertain provenance, usually badly documented in any technical sense and almost always seriously altered by time. As a result, the museum scientist must approach each problem with caution and with as much background as possible. There are no routine analyses. Problems must be carefully defined and the optimum available technique selected. Frequently, due to the restrictions imposed, the scientist and scholar must settle for what is possible rather than whatever might have been most desired.


National Gallery Refractory Object Sodium Aluminum Silicate Museum Object Calcium Magnesium Silicate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Salmon, M.E., “An X-ray Fluorescence Method for Micro Samples Applied to Chinese Bronze” in Application of Scientific Methods in the Analysis of Works of Art, Boston Museum of Fine Arts, June 1970 (in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lechtman, H., “The Gilding of Metals in Pre-Columbian Peru”, loc. cit.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stolow, N., Hanlan, J.F., and Boyer, R., “Element Distribution in Cross-Sections of Paintings Studied by the X-ray Macroprobe”, Studies in Conservation 14, 139–151 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gordus, A.A., “Non-Destructive Analysis of Metals by Neutron Activation” in Application of Scientific Methods to the Analysis of Works of Art, Boston Museum of Fine Arts, June 1970 (in press)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cairns, T., “Recent Interfaces between Mass Spectrometry and Art” this symposium.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young, W.J., “The Application of the Laser, etc.”, this symposium.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frankel, R., “Detection of Art Forgeries by X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy”, Isotopes and Radiation Technology, 8, 65–88 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanson, V.F., “The Curator’s Dream Instrument”, Application of Science in the Examination of Works of Art, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, June 1970 (in press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy, P.L., Tolmie, R.W., Hanlan, J.F., and Grant, J.MacG., “X-Ray Fluorescence Spectra of Artists Pigments”, AECL Report, CPSR-266 (March 1970).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanlan, J.F., Stolow, N., Grant, J.Macg., and Tolmie, R.W., “Application of Non-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis to the Study of Works of Art”, Bull. IIC-AG, 10, No. 2, 25–40 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanlan, J.F., “The EDX Spectrometer in Museum Use”, Bull. IIC-AG, 11, No. 2, 85–90 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frierman, J.D., Bowman, H.R., Perlman, I., and York, C. M., “X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrography: Use in Field Archaeology”, Science, 164, 588 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ASTM, “Energy Dispersion X-Ray Analysis”, American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giaque, R.D., “A Radioisotope Source-Target Assembly for X-Ray Spectrometry”, Anal. Chem., 40, 2075–7 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ronzio, R.D. and Salmon, Merlyn, “Trace Elements in Jade”, Gems and Minerals, (Feb., 1970 ) 25–26, 45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. F. Hanlan
    • 1
  1. 1.National Conservation Research LaboratoryNational Gallery of CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations