Advertisement

Ion Excitation of Al K X-Ray Spectra

  • A. R. Knudson
  • P. G. Burkhalter
  • D. J. Nagel

Abstract

High resolution measurements of ion-excited Al K spectra were extended to include Al projectile spectra and Al target spectra excited by heavier projectiles (Ar, Ni). Spectra from 3.0-MeV Al projectiles showed that the number of L vacancies present at the time of K vacancy decay is determined largely by collisions subsequent to production of the K vacancy. Heavy projectiles on Al targets produce Al spectra which appear to be the result of two ionization mechanisms operating simultaneously. Molecular orbital formation may enter into the interpretation of satellite structure in both Al projectile and Al target spectra.

Keywords

Electron Loss High Resolution Measurement Loss Cross Section Heavy Projectile Recoil Excitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. R. Knudson, P. G. Burkhalter and D. J. Nagel, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Inner Shell Ionization and Future Applications, R. W. Fink, Ed., AEC Report CONF-720404, 3, 1675 (1973).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. R. Knudson et al., Phys. Rev. Ltrs. 26, 1149 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    F. C. Jundt, H. Kubo, K. H. Purser, A. R. Knudson, and D. J. Nagel, to be published.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. R. Knudson, D. J. Nagel, P. G. Burkhalter, Phys. Ltrs. 42A, 69 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    P. Richard et al., Bull., APS 18, 560 (1973).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. G. Burkhalter, A. R. Knudson, D. J. Nagel and K. L. Dunning, Phys. Rev. A6, 2093 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. Richard, C. F. Moore, and D. K. Olsen, Phys. Ltrs. 43A, 519 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. Burch in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Inner Shell Ionization and Future Applications, R. W. Fink, ed., AEC Report CONF-720404, 2, 1464 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Barat and W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. A6, 211 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Kubo, F. C. Jundt, and K. H. Purser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 674 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    K. Taulberg, B. Fastrup, and E. Laegsgaard, Phys. Rev. A8, 1814 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    F. Hopkins, D. O. Elliott, C. P. Bhalla, and P. Richard, Phys. Rev. A8, 2952 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    G. Ryding, A. Wittkower, G. Nussbaum, A. Saxman, and P. H. Rose, Phys. Rev. A2, 1382 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. S. Dmitriev, V. S. Nikolaev, L. N. Fateeva, and Ya. A. Teplova, Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 11 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Knudson
    • 1
  • P. G. Burkhalter
    • 1
  • D. J. Nagel
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Research LaboratoryUSA

Personalised recommendations