Coiled Tubular Heat Exchangers

  • E. E. Abadzic
  • H. W. Scholz
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 18)


The development of the coiled tubular heat exchangers (CTHE) is closely related to the development of cryogenic technology. The first commerical liquefaction of air, made in 1895 by von Linde [1] in Germany and shortly thereafter by Hampson [2] in England, was achieved by the use of two types of coiled tubular exchangers. The first Linde exchanger consisted essentially of a long, helically wound concentric tube. Figure 1 shows a reproduction of the first Linde design of 1896 for an apparatus for the continuous production of “oxygen-rich air.” In this design, compressed air was divided into two streams and cooled in separate countercurrent coiled tubular heat exchangers with a low-pressure oxygen-rich stream O+ and a low-pressure nitrogen-rich stream N+, obtained by partial condensation of air. Various improvements to this heat exchanger type have since been built. Obviously, this design gives true counterflow, but relatively poor overall heat transfer coefficients due to channel flow on the low-pressure side.


Heat Transfer Heat Transfer Coefficient Heat Exchanger Heat Transfer Surface Straight Tube 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. Linde, German Patent No. 88824.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Hampson, British Patent No. 10156.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Glaser, VDI Zeitschrift, Beihefte Verfahrenstechnik, (4): 112 (1938).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. R. G. Eckert, Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York (1963), p. 162.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. D. Grimison, Trans. ASME, 59: 583 (1937).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. F. Schmidt, Ph.D. Dissertation, T. H. Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany (1965).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. N. Dravid, K. A. Smith, E. W. Merrill, and P. L. T. Brian, AICHE J. 17: 1114 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Akiyama and K. C. Cheng, Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 14: 1659 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Hausen, Wärmeübertragung im Gegenstrom, Gleichstrom und Kreuzstrom, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1950).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Wolf, Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 7: 901 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. D. Aulds and R. F. Barron, Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 10: 1457 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Schneller, Chemie-Ing. Techn. 42: 1245 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Chato, R. J. Laverman, and J. M. Shah, Intern. J. Heat and Mass Transfer, 14: 1691 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. M. Kays and A. L. London, Compact Heat Exchangers, McGraw-Hill, New York (1958).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. E. Abadzic
    • 1
  • H. W. Scholz
    • 1
  1. 1.Linde AktiengesellschaftHöllriegelskreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations