Characterization of Discriminative Response Control by Psychomotor Stimulants
Among the drugs which effectively control discriminative responding are the psychomotor stimulants. Despite differences in methodology utilized in different laboratories, the results available to date are quite consistent. Amphetamine, the prototype of this class of drugs, has been most extensively studied. For this reason, our discussion will center on amphetamine, other stimulants being mentioned where data are available.
KeywordsDiscriminative Stimulus None None Response Control Training Dose Lysergic Acid
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Barry, H., III, and Kubena, R. K.:Discriminative stimulus properties of alcohol, marihuana and atropine, In Drug Addiction: Experimental Pharmacology, ed. by J. M. Singh, L. H. Miller and H. Lal, pp. 3–16, Futura, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
- 3.Harris, R. T., and Balster, R. L.: An analysis of the function of drugs in the stimulus control of operant behavior. In Stimulus Properties of Drugs, ed. by T. Thompson and R. Pickens, pp. 111–132, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
- 5.Do, B. T., and McKenna, M. L.: Discriminative stimulus properties of central stimulants. In Drug Discrimination and State Dependent Learning, ed. by B. T. Ho, D. Chute and D. W. Richards, III, Academic Press, New York, in press.Google Scholar
- 6.Huang, J.-T.: Biochemical and pharmacological study of 2,5-dime-thoxy-4-methylamphetamine and analogs, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, 1972.Google Scholar
- 10.Innes, I. R. and Nickerson, M.: Norepinephrine, epinephrine, and the sympathomimetic amines. In The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, ed. by L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman, pp. 477–513, The McMillan Company, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
- 13.Kubena, R. K. and Barry, H., III: Generalization by rats of alcohol and atropine stimulus characteristics to other drugs. Psychopharmacologia 13: 196–206, 1969.Google Scholar
- 17.Richards, D. W., III, Harris, R. T. and Do, B. T.: Central control of d-amphetamine-induced discriminative stimuli. Abstract presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the Society of Neurosciences, San Diego, California, Nov. 7–10, p. 340, 1973.Google Scholar
- 25.Silverman, P. B. and Do, B. T.: Manuscript in preparation, 1976.Google Scholar
- 27.Snyder, S. H., Faillace, L. A. and Weingartner, H.:DOM (STP), a new hallucinogenic drug, and DOET: effects in normal subjects. Amer. J. Psychiat. 125: 357–364, 1968.Google Scholar
- 29.Van Rossum, J. M., Van Der Schoot, J. A. and Hurkmans, J.A.Th.M.: Mechanism of action of cocaine and amphetamine in the brain. Ex-perientia 18: 229–231, 1962.Google Scholar
- 30.Waters, W. H., Richards, D. W., III and Harris, R. T.: Discriminative control and generalization of the stimulus properties of D, L-amphetamine in the rat. In Drug Addiction: Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 1, ed. by J. M. Singh, L. Miller, H. Lal, pp. 87–98, Futura, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
- 32.Weissman, A., Koe, B. K. and Tenen, S. S.: Antiamphetamine effects following inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase. J. Pharnacol. Exp. Ther. 151: 339–352, 1966.Google Scholar