Mechanisms and Functions of Electrically Mediated Inhibition in the Vertebrate Central Nervous System

  • H. Korn
  • D. S. Faber
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 15)


Although electrophysiologists have come to accept the concept that excitatory interactions between neurons can be mediated both electrically and chemically, it is generally assumed that inhibition is best carried out chemically (Bennett, 1972). Since inhibition generally results in a sign inversion, that is, depolarization of the presynaptic neuron leads to hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic element, it cannot commonly be mediated by electrotonic junctions. Exceptions under special conditions involve the preferential transmission of the spike after-hyperpolarization relative to the depolarizing phase of the action potential itself. In addition, this particular form of inhibition, which can be due to either a summation of after-hyperpolarizations during presynaptic firing (Tauc, 1969) or to a rectifying junction (Arvanitaki & Chalazonitis, 1959), results in a complex biphasic postsynaptic potential rather than in a pure hyperpolarization. Finally, it has been pointed out that these electrotonic junctions would favor excitatory transmission in the opposite direction (Arvanitaki & Chalazonitis, 1959).


Spinal Cord Stimulation Intracellular Recording Lower Trace Eighth Nerve Axon Hillock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ARVANITAKI, A. & CHALAZONITIS, N. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco1143:1, 1959.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    BARRETT, J.N. & Crill, W.D. Brain Res. 28:556, 1971.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    BARTELMEZ, G.W. J. Comp. Neurol.25:87, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    BENNETT, M.V.L. A comparison of electrically and chemically mediated transmission. In: Structure and Function of Synapses. (G.D. Pappas & D.P. Purpura, eds.) New York, Raven Press Publ., p. 221, 1972.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    BODIAN, D. J. Comp. Neurol.68:117, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    DIAMOND, J. J. Physiol. (London)194:669, 1968.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DIAMOND, J. The Mauthner cell. In: Fish Physiology. Vol. V. (W.S. Hoar & D.J. Randall, eds.) New York, Academic Press, p. 265, 1971.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ECCLES, J.C. The Physiology of Synapses. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    FABER, D.S. & KORN, H. Science179:577, 1973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    FURSHPAN, E.J. & FURUKAWA, T. J. Neurophysiol.25:732, 1962.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    FURUKAWA, T. Prog. Brain Res.21A:44, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    FURUKAWA, T. & FURSHPAN, E.J. J. Neurophysiol.26:140, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    KORN, H. & FABER, D.S. J. Gen. Physiol.61:261, 1973.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    KORN, H. & FABER, D.S. J. Neurophysiol.38:452, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LUX, H.D., SCHUBERT, P. & KREUTZBERG, G.W. Direct matching of morphological and electrophysiological data in cat spinal motoneurons. In: Excitatory Synaptic Mechanisms. (P. Anderson & J.K.S. Jansen, eds.) Oslo, Universitetsforlaget, p. 189, 1970.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    NAKAJIMA, Y. J. Cell Biol. In press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    NELSON, P.G. J. Neurophysiol.29:275, 1966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    RALL, W. Exp. Neurol.1:491, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    ROBERTSON, J.D. J. Cell Biol.19:201, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ROBERTSON, J.D., BODENHEIMER, T.S. & STAGE, D.E. J. Cell Biol.19:159, 1963.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    STRETTON, A.O.W. & KRAVITZ, E.A. Science162:132, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    TAUC, L. Polyphasic synaptic activity. In: Mechanisms of Synaptic Transmission. (K. Akert & P.G. Waser, eds.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 247, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    WILSON, D.M. Science129:841, 1959.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Korn
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. S. Faber
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de PhysiologieC.H.U. Pitie-SalpetriereParisFrance
  2. 2.Maitre de Recherches (I.N.S.E.R.M.)France

Personalised recommendations