Advertisement

Further Studies on Memory Formation in the Goldfish

  • Bernard W. Agranoff
Part of the Advances in Behavioral Biology book series (ABBI, volume 4)

Abstract

The concept of consolidation, or fixation, of memory is historically linked to the effects of disruptive agents on the brain and their interpretation. For example, retrograde amnesia seen in man following physical trauma has been interpreted to indicate that permanent memory normally forms following a learning experience. This idea was subsequently expanded by evidence for a temporal gradient of growing insusceptibility to disruption of newly-formed memory in both man and in experimental animals. Agents producing convulsions and unconsciousness, such as electroconvulsive shock, were reported to produce varying degrees of performance decrement as a function of the time of their administration. The question remained whether some unitary or multiple process of memory fixation existed or alternatively, whether the various disruptive agents had noxious properties that interfered with registration, storage or retrieval of behavioral information.

Keywords

Memory Formation Optic Tectum Retrograde Amnesia Orotic Acid Electroconvulsive Shock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agranoff, B.W. 1967. Agents that block memory. In: The Neurosci-ences: A Study Program, G.C. Quarton, T. Melnechuk and F.O. Schmitt (Eds.), The Rockefeller University Press, New York, pp 756–764.Google Scholar
  2. Agranoff, B.W. 1970. Protein synthesis and memory formation. In: Protein Metabolism of the Nervous System, A. Lajtha (Ed.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 533–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agranoff, B.W. 1971. Effects of antibiotics on long-term memory formation in the goldfish. In: Animal Memory, W. K. Honig and P.H.R. James (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 243–258.Google Scholar
  4. Agranoff, B.W., Davis, R.E. and Brink, J.J. 1966. Chemical studies on memory fixation in goldfish. Brain Res., 1 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agranoff, B.W. and Klinger, P.D. 1964. Puromycin effect on memory fixation in the goldfish. Science, 146, 952–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agranoff, B.W., Davis, R.E., Casola, L. and Lim. R. 1967. Actino-mycin D blocks memory formation of a shock-avoidance in the goldfish. Science, 158, 1600–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Agranoff, B.W., Davis, R.E., Lim, R. and Casola, L. 1968. Biological effects of antimetabolites used in behavioral studies. In: Psychopharmacology: A Review of Progress, 1957–1967, D.E. Efron, J.O. Cole, J. Levine and J.R. Wittenborn (Eds.), Public Health Service Publication No. 1836, pp. 909-917.Google Scholar
  8. Barondes, S.H. and Cohen, H.D. 1968. Arousal and the conversion of “short-term” to “long-term” memory. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 61, 923–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baskin, F. and Agranoff, B.W, 1971. Effect of various stresses on incorporation of 3H-orotic acid into goldfish brain RNA. Trans.Am. Soc. Neurochem., 2 56.Google Scholar
  10. Casola, L., Lim, R., Davis, R.E. and Agranoff, B.W. 1968. Behavioral and biochemical effects of intracranial injection of cyto-sine arabinoside in goldfish. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 60, 1389–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherkin, A. 1971. Biphasic time course of performance after one-trial avoidance training in the chicken. Commun. Behav. Biol., 5 379–381.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, R.E. and Agranoff, B.W. 1966. Stages of memory formation in goldfish: Evidence for an environmental trigger. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 55, 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, R.E., Bright, P.J. and Agranoff, B.W. 1965. Effect of ECS and puromycin on memory in fish. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 60, 162–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elam, J.S. and Agranoff, B.W. 1971. Rapid transport of protein in the goldfish optic tectum. J. Neurochem., 18, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lajtha, A. and Toth, J. 1966. Instability of cerebral proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 23, 294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McEwen, B.S. and Grafstein, B. 1968. Fast and slow components in axonal transport of protein. J. Cell Biology, 38, 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neale, J.H. and Gray, I. 1971. Protein synthesis and retention of a conditioned response in rainbow trout as affected by temperature reduction. Brain Res., 26, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Quartermain, D., McEwen, B.S. and Azmitia, E.C., Jr. 1970. Amnesia produced by electroconvulsive shock or cycloheximide: Conditions for recovery. Science, 169, 683–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Riege, W.H. and Cherkin, A. 1971. One-trial learning and biphasic time course of performance in the goldfish. Science, 172, 966–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shashoua, V.E. 1968. RNA changes in goldfish brain during learning. Nature, 217, 238–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weiner, N. and Rabadjija, M. 1968. The regulation of norepineph-rine synthesis. Effect of puromycin on the accelerated synthesis of norepinephrin dissociated with nerve stimulation. J.Pharm.Exp. Ther., 164, 103–114.Google Scholar
  22. Zinkin, S. and Miller, A.J. 1967. Recovery of memory after amnesia induced by electroconvulsive shock. Science, 155, 102–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard W. Agranoff
    • 1
  1. 1.Mental Health Research InstituteThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations