Advertisement

Chemoreception in Seabirds

  • Bernice M. Wenzel

Abstract

In a world rich in odors, only the birds as a major group have been generally regarded as insensitive or oblivious to such stimuli—even, in Wood Jones’s (1937a) phrase, as emancipated from olfactory dominance. Yet olfaction is one of the three great modalities for distance communication, functioning as effectively in an aerial habitat as in terrestrial or aquatic habitats. Perhaps our own diminished sensitivity to external chemical messages and our inability to sustain an aerial existence have influenced our opinions about olfactory functioning in birds. Notably, however, we feel no such hesitation in the case of flying insects, which are readily accepted as being critically guided by odor signals. In contrast, taste seems to present less of a problem. Birds, like most other creatures, must ingest food through the mouth, and nothing seems more reasonable than that this food would be selected partly on the basis of taste.

Keywords

Olfactory Bulb Olfactory System Olfactory Nerve Olfactory Mucosa Giant Petrel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainley, D. G., 1977, Feeding methods in seabirds: A comparison of polar and tropical nesting communities in the eastern Pacific Ocean, in: Adaptations within Antarctic Ecosystems ( G. A. Llano, ed.), pp. 664–685, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, R. G., 1962, The Madeiran Storm Petrel Oceanodroma castro, Ibis 103b: 274.Google Scholar
  3. Ardley, R. A. B., 1936, The birds of the South Orkney Islands, Discovery Rep. 12: 349.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, E. A., 1951, Discharge of oily fluid by young fulmars, Ibis 93: 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, C. M. A., and Manwell, C., 1975, Penguin proteins: Biochemical contributions to classification and natural history, in: The Biology of Penguins ( B. Stonehouse, ed.), pp. 43–56, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bang, B. G., 1965, Anatomical adaptations for olfaction in the Snow Petrel, Nature (London) 205: 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bang, B. G., 1966, The olfactory apparatus of tubenosed birds (Procellariiformes), Acta Anat. 65: 391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bang, B. G., 1971, Functional anatomy of the olfactory system in 23 orders of birds, Acta Anat. Suppl. 58: 1.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, J. R., 1970, Breeding seasons and moult in some smaller Antarctic Petrels, in Antarctic Ecology, Vol. 1 ( M. W. Holdgate, ed.), pp. 542–550, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, J. R., and Brown, D. W., 1971, The breeding biology of the Black-bellied Storm-petrel Fregetta tropica, Ibis 113: 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beck, J. R., and Brown, D. W., 1972, The biology of Wilson’s Storm Petrel, Oceanites oceanicus (Kuhl), at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports, No. 69.Google Scholar
  12. Bierman, W. H., and Voous, K. H., 1950, Birds observed and collected during the whaling expeditions of the “Willem Barendsz” in the Antarctic, 1946–1947 and 1947–1948, Ardea 37 (suppl): 1.Google Scholar
  13. Bishop, L. B., 1949, Catching petrels by flashlight, Condor 51: 272.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, D. A., 1966, Breeding biology of the Snow Petrel Pagodroma nivea (Forster), ANARE Scientific Reports, Ser. B(1), No. 89.Google Scholar
  15. Bumm, A., 1883, Das Grosshirn der Vögel, Z. Wiss, Zool. 38: 430.Google Scholar
  16. Burne, R. H., 1908, Exhibition of, and remarks upon, preparation of the Olfactory Organs of a Sea-Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), Sea-Bream (Pagellus centrodontus), and an Albatross (Diomedea exulans), Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1: 65.Google Scholar
  17. Carrick, R., and Ingham, S. E., 1970, Ecology and population dynamics of Antarctic sea birds, in Antarctic Ecology, Vol. 1 ( M. W. Holdgate, ed.), pp. 505–525, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. Cobb, S., 1960, Observations on the comparative anatomy of the avian brain, Perspect. Biol. Med. 3: 383.Google Scholar
  19. Crossin, R. S., 1969, Apparent sense of smell in the family Hydrobatidae, Unpublished data from Pacific Ocean Biological Survey Program, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, J., 1952, The Fulmar, Collins, London.Google Scholar
  21. Grubb, T. C., Jr., 1972, Smell and foraging in shearwaters and petrels, Nature (London) 237: 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grubb, T. C., Jr., 1974, Olfactory navigation to the nesting burrow in Leach’s Petrel (Oceanodroma leucorrhoa), Anim. Behay. 22: 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grubb, T. C., Jr., 1979, Olfactory guidance of Leach’s Storm Petrel to the breeding island, Wilson Bull. 91: 141.Google Scholar
  24. Hagen, Y., 1952, Birds of Tristan de Cunha, in Results of the Norwegian Scientific Expedition to Tristan da Cunha 1937–1938, Vol. 3, No. 20 (E. Christophersen, ed.), 248 pp., Norske Videnskaps-Akademi, Oslo.Google Scholar
  25. Harriman, G. E., 1967, Laughing Gull offered saline in preference and survival tests, Physiol. Zool. 40: 273.Google Scholar
  26. Harriman, G. E., and Kare, M. H., 1966a, Tolerance for hypertonic saline solutions in Herring Gulls, Starlings, and Purple Grackles, Physiol. Zool. 39: 117.Google Scholar
  27. Harriman, G. E., and Kare, M. H., 1966b, Aversion to saline solutions in Starlings, Purple Grackles, and Herring Gulls, Physiol. Zool. 39: 123.Google Scholar
  28. Hutchison, L. V., Rausch, L. J., and Wenzel, B. M., 1977, Single unit activity in the olfactory pathway in the pigeon, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 3: 80.Google Scholar
  29. Hutchison, L. V., and Wenzel, B. M., 1978, Unit activity in the ipsilateral and contralateral olfactory pathway in the pigeon, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 4: 87.Google Scholar
  30. Hutchison, L. V., and Wenzel, B. M., 1980, Attraction of procellariiforms to food-related odors at sea, Condor (in press).Google Scholar
  31. Jacob, J., 1976, Chemotaxonomical relationships between penguins and tubenoses, Biochem. Syst. 4: 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jouventin, P., 1977, Olfaction in Snow Petrels, Condor 79: 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klinckowström, A., 1891, Les lobes ofactoires du Fulmarus glacialis, Biol. Foren. Stockholm 3: 10.Google Scholar
  34. Kritzler, H., 1948, Observations on behavior in captive fulmars, Condor 50: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lockie, J. D., 1952, A comparison of some aspects of the retinae of the Manx Shearwater, Fulmar Petrel, and House Sparrow, Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 93: 347.Google Scholar
  36. Lockley, R. M., 1961, Shearwaters, Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y.Google Scholar
  37. Lovenskiold, H. L., 1960, The Snow Petrel Pagodroma nivea nesting in Dronning Maud Land, Ibis, 102: 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macadar, A. W., Rausch, L. J., Wenzel, B.M., and Hutchison, L. V., 1980, Electrophysiology of the olfactory pathway in the pigeon, J. Comp. Physiol. A. (in press).Google Scholar
  39. Maher, W. J., 1962, Breeding biology of the Snow Petrel near Cape Hallett, Antarctica, Condor 64: 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, P. W., 1942, Notes on some pelagic birds of the coast of British Columbia, Condor 44: 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews, L. H., 1929, The birds of South Georgia, Discovery Rep. 1: 561.Google Scholar
  42. Miller, L., 1940, Observations on the Black-footed Albatross, Condor 42: 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, L., 1942, Some tagging experiments with Black-footed Albatrosses, Condor 44: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Murphy, R. C., 1936, Oceanic Birds of South America, American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Murphy, R. C., 1964, Systematics and distribution of Antarctic Petrels, in Biologie Antarctique ( R. Carrick, M. W. Holdgate, and J. Prévost, eds.), pp. 349–358, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
  46. Palmer, R. S., (ed.), 1962, Handbook of North American Birds, Vol. 1, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  47. Potts, T. H., 1872, On the birds of New Zealand, Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 5: 171.Google Scholar
  48. Pryor, M. E., 1968, The avifauna of Haswell Island, Antarctica, in Antarctic Bird Studies (O. L. Austin, ed.), Antarctic Research Series, Vol. 12, pp. 57–82, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pycraft, W. P., 1907, On the systematic position of the petrels, in: A Monograph of the Petrels (F. du C. Godman, author), pp. xv-xxi, Witherby, London.Google Scholar
  50. Rensch, B., and Neunzig, R., 1925, Experimentelle Untersuchungen über den Geschmackssinn der Vögel II, J. für Ornithol. 73: 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rice, D. W., and Kenyon, K. W., 1962, Breeding cycles and behavior of Laysan and Black-footed Albatrosses, Auk 79: 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richdale, L. E., 1963, Biology of the Sooty Shearwater Puffinus griseus, Proc. Zool. Soc. London 141: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rieke, G. K., and Wenzel, B. M., 1978, Forebrain projections of the pigeon olfactory bulb, J. Morphol. 158: 41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts, B., 1940, The life cycle of Wilson’s Petrel Oceanites oceanicus (Kuhl), Br. Graham Land Exped. 1934–37 1: 141.Google Scholar
  55. Routh, M., 1949, Ornithological observations in the Antarctic seas 1946–47, Ibis 91: 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rowan, M. K., 1952, The Greater Shearwater Puffinus gravis at its breeding grounds, Ibis 94: 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rowan, M. K., 1965, Regulation of sea-bird numbers, Ibis 107: 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shallenberger, R. J., 1973, Breeding biology, homing behavior, and communication patterns of the Wedge-tailed Shearwater, Puffinus pacificus, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  59. Shallenberger, R. J., 1975, Olfactory use in the Wedge-tailed Shearwater (Puffinus pacificus) on Manana Island, Hawaii, in: Olfaction and Taste 5 ( D. A. Denton and J. P. Coghlan, eds.), pp. 355–360, Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shibuya, T., and Tonosaki, K., 1972, Electrophysiological activities of single olfactory receptor cells in some vertebrates, in: Olfaction and Taste 4 ( D. L. Schneider, ed.), pp. 102–108, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  61. Shibuya, T., Iijima, M., and Tonosaki, K., 1970, [Responses of the olfactory nerve in the seagull, Larus crassirotris], Zool. Mag. Tokyo 79: 237.Google Scholar
  62. Stager, K. E., 1967, Avian olfaction, Am. Zool. 7: 415.Google Scholar
  63. Strong, R. M., 1911, The sense of smell in birds, J. Morphol. 22: 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Swales, M. K., 1965, The sea-birds of Gough Island, Ibis 107: 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thibault, J.-C., and Holyoak, D. T., 1978, Vocal and olfactory displays in the petrel genera Bulweria and Pterodroma, Ardea 66: 53.Google Scholar
  66. Tickell, W. L. N., 1962, The Dove Prion, Pachyptila desolata Gmelin, Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey Scientific Reports, No. 33, 55 pp.Google Scholar
  67. Tickell, W. L. N., 1970, Biennial breeding in albatrosses, in: Antarctic Ecology Vol. 1 ( M. W. Holdgate, ed.), pp. 551–557, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  68. Travers, H. H., 1872, On the birds of the Chatham Islands, Trans. Proc. N.Z. Inst. 5: 212.Google Scholar
  69. Tucker, D., 1965, Electrophysiological evidence for olfactory function in birds, Nature (London) 207: 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vallentin, R., 1924, Zoology, in: The Falkland Islands ( V. F. Boyson, ed.), pp. 283–382, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  71. van Oordt, G. J., and Kruijt, J. P., 1954, Birds observed on a voyage in the South Atlantic and Southern Oceans in 1951/1952, Ardea 42: 245.Google Scholar
  72. Warham, J., 1955, Observations on the Little Shearwater at the nest, West. Aust. Nat. 5: 31.Google Scholar
  73. Warham, J., 1956, The breeding of the Great-winged Petrel Pterodroma macroptera, Ibis 98: 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Warham, J., 1958, The nesting of the Shearwater Puffinus carneipes, Auk 75: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Warham, J., 1960, Some aspects of breeding behaviour in the Short-tailed Shearwater, Emu 60: 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warham, J., 1962, The biology of the Giant Petrel Macronectes giganteus, Auk 79: 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warham, J., 1964, Breeding behaviour in Procellariiformes, in: Biologie Antarctique ( R. Carrick, M. W. Holdgate, and J. Prévost, eds.), pp. 389–394, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
  78. Warham, J., 1971, Aspects of breeding behaviour in the Royal Penguin Eudyptes chrysolophus schlegeli, Notornis 18: 91.Google Scholar
  79. Warham, J., 1977, The incidence, functions and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils, Proc. N.Z. Ecol. Soc. 24: 84.Google Scholar
  80. Watson, G. E., Angle, J. P., Harper, P. C., Bridge, M. A., Schlatter, R. P., Tickell, W. L. N., Boyd, J. C., and Boyd, M. M., 1971, Birds of the Antarctic and Subantarctic, in: Antarctic Map Folio Series (V. C. Bushnell, ed.), Folio 14, pp. 1–8 with 15 plates, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  81. Watson, J. B., 1910, Further data on the homing sense of noddy and sooty terns, Science 32: 470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wenzel, B. M., 1967, Olfactory perception in birds, in: Olfaction and Taste 2 ( T. Hayashi, ed.), pp. 203–217, Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  83. Wenzel, B. M., 1973, Chemoreception, in: Avian Biology, Vol. 3 ( D. S. Farner, and J. R. King, eds.), pp. 389–415, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  84. Wenzel, B. M., and Sieck, M., 1972, Olfactory perception and bulbar electrical activity in several avian species, Physiol. Behay. 9: 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Weymouth, R. D., Lasiewski, R. C., and Berger, A. J., 1964, The tongue apparatus in hummingbirds, Acta Anat. 58: 252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wood Jones, F., 1937a, The olfactory organ of the Tubinares. I., Emu 36: 281.Google Scholar
  87. Wood Jones, F., 1937b, The olfactory organ of the Tubinares. III., Emu 37: 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernice M. Wenzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Brain Research InstituteUCLA School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations