Advertisement

General Bibliography

  • Roy Robinson

Keywords

House Mouse Product Formula Recombination Fraction Incomplete Penetrance Genetic Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. ALAM, M. (1929). The calculation of linkage values. Mem. Dep. Agric. India, Bot. Ser., 18, No. 1, 56 Pp.Google Scholar
  2. ALLARD, R. W. (1956). Formulae and tables to facilitate the calculation of recombination values in heredity. Hilgardia, 24, 235–278.Google Scholar
  3. ALLARD, R. W. and ALDER, H. L. (1960). The effect of incomplete penetrance on the estimation of recombination values. Heredity, 15, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ANDRESEN, E. (1968). Sequential analysis of genetic linkage in pigs. Roy. Vet. Agric. Coll. Copen. Yrb. (1968), 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. BAILEY, N. T. J. (1949a). The use of the product formula for the estimation of linkage when differential viability is present. Heredity, 3, 220–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BAILEY, N. T. J. (1949b). A method for allowing for differential viability in estimating linkage from backcross matings in coupling only or repulsion only. Heredity, 3, 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BAILEY, N. T. J. (1950). The influence of partial manifestation on the detection of linkage. Heredity, 4, 327–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BAILEY, N. T. J. (1951). Testing the solubility of maximum likelihood equations in the routine application of scoring methods. Biometrics, 7, 268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BAILEY, N. T. J. (1961). Introduction to the mathematical theory of genetic linkage. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. BHAT, N. R. (1950). Procedure for the measurement of linkage between characters determined by dissimilar factors with complete dominance. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed., 10, 21–27.Google Scholar
  11. BODMER, W. F. (1959). Multiplicative effects and the logarithmic transformation in the analysis of balanced multi-point linkage tests. Heredity, 13, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BODMER, W. F. and PARSONS, P. A. (1959a). The analogy between factorial experimentation and balanced multi-point linkage tests. Heredity, 13, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. BODMER, W. F. and PARSONS, P. A. (1959b). Factorial analysis of balanced four and higher point linkage tests. Heredity, 13, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CARTER, T. C. (1951). The position of fidget in linkage group V of the house mouse. J. Genet., 50, 264–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CARTER, T. C. (1954). A search for chromatid interference in the male house mouse. Z. Ind. Abst. Vererb., 86, 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CARTER, T. C. (1957). The use of linked marker genes for detecting recessive autosomal lethals in the mouse. J. Genet., 55, 585–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. CARTER, T. C. and FALCONER, D. S. (1951). Stocks for detecting linkage in the mouse and the theory of their design. J. Genet., 50, 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. CARTER, T. C. and FALCONER, D. S. (1952). A review of independent segregation in the house mouse. J. Genet., 50, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. CARTER, T. C. and PHILLIPS, R. J. S. (1953). The sex distribution of waved-2, shaker-2 and rex in the house mouse. J. Vererbungslehre, 85, 564–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. CARTER, T. C. and ROBERTSON, A. (1952). A mathematical treatment of genetical recombination using a four strand model. Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 139, 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CASTLE, W. S. (1939). On a method of testing for linkage between lethal genes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, Wash., 25, 593–594.Google Scholar
  22. COCKRAN, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common X2 tests. Biometrics, 10, 417–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. COOPER, C. B. (1939). A linkage between naked and caracul in the house mouse. J. Hered., 30, 212.Google Scholar
  24. DOUGLAS, L. T. and GEERTS, S. J. (1967). Meiosis II: a modified affinity model in mice. Genetica, 37, 511–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EDWARDS, A. W. F. (1958). Number of mating types required for balance in multi-point linkage programmes. Nature, Lond., 181, 503–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FALCONER, D. S (1949). The estimation of mutation rates from incompletely tested gametes and the detection of mutations in mammals. J. Genet., 49, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. FINNERY, D. J. (1949). The estimation of the frequency of recombinants. I. Matings of known phase. J. Genet., 49, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. FISHER, R. A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, 122, 309–368.Google Scholar
  29. FISHER, R. A. (1939). The precision of the product formula for the estimation of linkage. Ann. Eugen., 9, 50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. FISHER, R. A. (1946). A system of scoring linkage data with special reference to pied factors in mice. Amer. Nat., 80, 568–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. FISHER, R. A. (1948). A quantitative theory of genetic recombination and chiasma formation. Biometrics, 4, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. FISHER, R. A. (1949). Note on the test of significance for differential viability in frequency data from a complete three point test. Heredity, 3, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. FISHER, R. A (1951). The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  34. FISHER, R. A (1962). The detection of a sex difference in recombination values using double heterozygotes. J. Theoret. Biol., 3, 509–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. FISHER, R. A. and BALMUKAND, B. (1928). The estimation of linkage from the offspring of selfed heterozygotes. J. Genet., 20, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. FISHER, R. A., LYON, M. F. and OWEN, A. R. G. (1947). The sex chromosome of the house mouse. Heredity, 1, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. FISHER, R. A. and MATHER, K. (1936). A linkage test with mice. Ann. Eugen., 7, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. FISHER, R. A. and YATES, F. (1953). Statistical tables for biological agricultural and medical research. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  39. GREEN, M. C. (1963). Methods for testing linkage. In Burdette, W. J. (Editor) Methodology in mammalian genetics. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
  40. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1919a). The probable errors of calculated linkage values and the most accurate method of determining gametic from certain zygotic series. J. Genet., 8, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1919b). The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distance between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet., 8, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. HALDANE, J. B. S. (1953). The estimation of two parameters from a sample. Sankhya, 12, 313–320.Google Scholar
  43. HOLLANDER, W. F. (1953). The ABC’s of genetics. J. Hered., 44, 211–212.Google Scholar
  44. HOLLANDER, W. F. (1955). Epistasis and hypostasis. J. Hered., 46, 223–225.Google Scholar
  45. HOLLANDER, W. F. (1964). Repulsive thoughts on coupling. J. Hered., 55, 17–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. HUTCHINSON, J. B. (1929). The application of the method of maximumGoogle Scholar
  47. likelihood to the estimation of linkage. Genetics,14, 519–537.Google Scholar
  48. IMMER, F. R. (1930). Formulae and tables for calculating linkage intensities. Genetics, 15, 81–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. IMMER, F. R. (1931). The efficiency of the correlation coefficient for estimating linkage intensities. Amer. Nat., 65, 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. IMMER, F. R. (1934). Calculating linkage intensities from F3 data. Genetics, 19, 119–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. IMMER, F. R. and HENDERSON, M. T. (1943). Linkage studies in barley. Genetics, 28, 419–440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. KOSAMBI, D. D. (1944). The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen., 12, 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. KRAMER, H. H. and BURHAM, C. R. (1947). Methods of combining linkage values from backcross, F2 and F3 genetic data. Genetics, 32, 379–390.Google Scholar
  54. LUDWIG, W. (1934). Uber numerische Beziehungen der CrossingoverWerte untereinander. Z. Ind. Abst. Ververb., 67, 58–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. MATHER, K. (1935). The combination of data. Ann. Eugen., 6, 399–410. MATHER, K. (1936a). Types of linkage data and their value. Ann. Eugen., 7, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. MATHER, K. (1936b). The determination of position in crossingover. I. Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet., 33, 207–235.Google Scholar
  57. MATHER, K. (1937). The determination of position in crossingover. II. The chromosome length/chiasma frequency relation. Cy tologia, Fujii Jub. Vol., 514–526.Google Scholar
  58. MATHER, K. (1938). Crossingover. Biol. Rev., 13, 252–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MATHER, K. (1946). Statistical analysis in biology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  60. MATHER, K. (1951). The measurement of linkage in heredity. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  61. MCINTOSH, W. B. (1956). Linkage in Peromyscus and sequential tests for independent assortment. Contr. Lab. Vert. Biol. Univ. Mich., 73, 1–27.Google Scholar
  62. MICHIE, D. (1953). Affinity: a new genetic phenomenon in the house mouse. Evidence from distant crosses. Nature, Lond., 171, 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. MITCHIE, D. (1955). Affinity. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 144, 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. MURTY, V. N. (1954a). The calculation of linkage values by Fisher’s scoring method. Indian J. Genet. Plant. Breed., 14, 39–43.Google Scholar
  65. MURTY, V. N. (1954b). Estimation of linkage by the method of minimum discrepancy. Genetics, 39, 581–586.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. OWEN, A. R. G. (1949). The theory of genetical recombination. I. Long chromosome arms. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 136, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. OWEN, A. R. G. (1950). The theory of genetical recombination. Advanc. Genet., 3, 117–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. OWEN, A. R. G. (1951). An extension of Kosambi’s formula. Nature, Lond., 168, 208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. OWEN, A. R. G. (1952). Four-strand crossingover. Nature, Lond., 170, 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. OWEN, A. R. G. (1953a). Super-recombination in the sex chromosome of the mouse. Heredity, 7, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. OWEN, A. R. G. (1953b). The analysis of multiple linkage data. Heredity, 7, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. PARSONS, P. A. (1957a). An effect of gene arrangement on the recombination fraction in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity, 11, 117–127.Google Scholar
  73. PARSONS, P. A. (1957b). Partial manifestation of a gene in complete three and higher point backcross data. Heredity, 11, 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. PARSONS, P. A. (1958). A survey of genetic interference in maize. Genetica, 29, 222–237.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. RAO, C. R. (1948). Large sample tests of statistical hypothesis concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimation. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 44, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. RAO, C. R. (1950). Methods of scoring linkage data giving the simultaneous segregation of three factors. Heredity, 4, 37–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. RAO, C. R. (1952). Advanced statistical methods in biometrical research. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  78. RIEGER, R., MICHAELIS, A. and GREEN, M. M. (1968). A glossary of genetics and cytogenetics. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  79. SANCHEZ-MONGE, E. (1952). The estimation of linkage with incomplete penetrance. Heredity, 6, 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. SEAL, K. C. (1957). Generalization of product formula. J. India Soc. Agric. Statist., 9, 31–40.Google Scholar
  81. SHULT, E. E., DESBOROUGH, S. and LINDEGREN, C. C. (1962). Preferential segregation in Saccharomy ces. Genet. Res., 3, 196–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. SCHULT, E. E., LINDEGREN, G. and LINDEGREN, C. C. (1967). Hybrid specific linkage relations in Saccharomyces. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol., 9, 723–759.Google Scholar
  83. SRINATH, K. V. (1949). The mechanics of crossingover. Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 136, 126–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. STEVENS, W. L. (1936). The analysis of interference. J. Genet., 32, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. STEVENS, W. L. (1939). Tables of the recombination fraction estimated from the product ratio. J. Genet., 39, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. STEVENS, W. L. (1942). Accuracy of mutation rates. J. Genet., 43, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. TAKASHI, I. (1957). The theory of crossingover. Jap. J. Genet., 32, 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. WALLACE, M. E. (1953). Affinity: a new genetic phenomenon in the house mouse. Evidence from within laboratory stocks. Nature, Lond., 171, 27–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. WALLACE, M. E. (1957a). A balanced three-point experiment for linkage group V of the house mouse. Heredity, 11, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. WALLACE, M. E. (1957b). The use of affinity in chromosome mapping. Biometrics, 13, 98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. WALLACE, M. E. (1958). Experimental evidence for a new genetic phenomenon. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., B., 241, 211–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. WALLACE, M. E. (1959). An experimental test of the hypothesis of affinity. Genetica, 29, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. WALLACE, M. E. (1961). Affinity: evidence from crossing inbred lines of mice. Heredity, 16, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. WALMSLEY, R. H. (1969). The general theory of mapping functions for random genetic recombination. Biophys. J., 9, 421–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. WRIGHT, M. E. (1947). Two sex-linkages in the house mouse with unusual recombination values. Heredity, 1, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Company Ltd. 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Robinson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations