Progress with Positron Beams for Atomic Collisions

  • W. C. Keever
  • B. Jaduszliwer
  • D. A. L. Paul
Conference paper


Positron collision studies at low energies using beams of slow positrons below 1 keV appear to have been limited to the following: an unpublished thesis by Cherry1 on secondary electron emission from surfaces under positron bombardment; and two published papers on the e+ - He scattering cross sections by Costello et al.2 and ourselves3. In a second publication of Costello et al.4 they discuss experimental evidence in favour of postulating a negative work function for slow positrons escaping from a metal surface. In the period 1965 to the present there have been several other attempts by various groups to produce slow positron beams, most of them unsuccessful and unpublished. The more recent work by McGowan and his coworkers and by ourselves has all been directed at obtaining a satisfactory beam of slow positrons for atomic collisions or at studying the characteristics of the beam, partly with a view to obtaining a better beam, and partly so as to understand the slow positron emission process about which we shall make some statements in what follows.


Atomic Collision Secondary Electron Emission Positron Beam Nickel Foil Positronium Formation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W.H. Cherry, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University (1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.G. Costello, D.E. Groce, D.F. Herring and J.W. McGowan, Can.J.Phys. 50, 23 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Jaduszliwer, W.C. Keever and D.A.L. Paul, Can.J.Phys. 50, 1414 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.G. Costello, D.E. Groce, D.F. Herring and J.W. McGowan, Phys.Rev. B, 5, 1433 (1972),Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G.H. Lohnert and R.T. Schneider, Nuclear Technology, 10 315 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Glasstone and M.C. Edlund, “The Elements of Nuclear Reactor Theory” (Van Nostrand, 1952), chapter 5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.Y. Tong, Phys.Rev. B, 5 1436 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.T.A. McKee, A.G.D. Jost and I.K. McKenzie, Can. J. Phys 417 (1972).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pendyala, J.W. McGowan and P.W. Zitzewitz, Phys. in Canada 28, No. 4 (Congress Issue), abstract EB12 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.H. Hodges and M.J. Stott, Phys. in Canada 28, No. 4 (Congress Issue), abstract BA3 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. C. Keever
    • 1
  • B. Jaduszliwer
    • 1
  • D. A. L. Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of TorontoToronto 181Canada

Personalised recommendations