## Abstract

The literature on electronic polarization behavior in atomic collisions was relatively sparse, up to a few years ago. This situation has now changed, and there is no difficulty in encountering comprehensive review papers on this subject. Some of these are listed in reference 1. These proceedings also contain a review by Professor Kessler on polarized electron sources,^{2} which of necessity includes discussion of the physical processes in atomic collisions which underlie most of present polarized beam source technology.

## Keywords

Total Cross Section Differential Cross Section Atom Beam Excitation Cross Section Atomic Collision
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Some earlier review papers, and papers of general interest in this subject include: “Production of Polarized Electron Beams”, K. Jost and H.D. Zeman, HEPL-590, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Cal,, April 1969; “Electron Spin Polarization by Low Energy Scattering”, J, Kessler, Rev. Mod. Phys., 41, 3 (1969); “Polarized Electrons”, W. Raith, Atomic Physics [iCAP- I], edited by B. Bederson, V. W. Cohen and F. M. Pichanick9 Plenum Press, pp. 389–415 (1969); “Polarization effects in elastic electron scattering” (in German), W. Eckstein, Institut Fur Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany IPP 7/1 Feb. 1970; “Electron Spin Polarization”, P. S. Farago, Reports on Progress in Physics, 34, 1055 (1971); “Polarized Electrons and Some of their Uses,” V. W. Hughes, International Conference on Polarized Targets, Lawrence Berkeley Lab., Univ. of California Aug. 1971. Review papers on related subjects were presented at one of the precursors of the present Conference series, the International Symposium on the Physics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms, held in Munich 1968. These include articles by P. S. Farago and H. Chr. Siegmann, W. Raith, E. Reichert and H. Kleinpoppen [North-Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam 1969, edited by Bopp and Kleinpoppen]. See also reference 2. For general discussions of the types of information obtainable in collision experiments in the alkalis involving polarized collision partners, see H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. A3, 2015 (1971); also a series of articles by B. Bederson in Comments on Atomic and Molecular Physics: 41 (1969); I, 65 (1969); II, 160 (1970–71).Google Scholar
- 2.Polarized Electron Sources, J. Kessler, these proceedings.Google Scholar
- 3.
- 4.W. R. Garrett and R. A. Mann, Phys. Rev. 130, 658 (1963); 135, A580 (1964); W. R. Garrett, Phys. Rev. 140, A705 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.P. M. Stone and J. R. Reitz, Phys. Rev. 131, 2101 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J. C. Crown and A. Russek, Phys. Rev. 138, A669 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.L. C. Balling, Phys. Rev. 179, 78 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.V. K. Lan, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 4, 658 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.It should also be noted, as has often been pointed out, that the alkalis do represent a special case where convergence in any excited state expansion is particularly favorable. This is due primarily to the relatively weak binding of the valence electron, which results in the atomic polarizability being attributable almost completely to the first excited (resonant) transition ns → np. Other atomic systems do not possess such a fortuitous property and therefore in general will require more elaborate expansions. We thank Dr. Temkin for his comments on this point.Google Scholar
- 10.See, for example, The Theory of Atomic Collisions, Third Edition, N. F. Mott and H. S. W. Massey (Oxford U. Press, 1965), p. 524 ff.; Mo J. Seaton, in Atomic and Molecular Processes, ed. by D. R. Bates (Academic Press, N.Y., 1962), pp. 374–420; P. G. Burke and H. M. Schey, Phys. Rev. 126, 147 (1962); P. G. Burke and K. Smith, Rev. Mod. Phys. 3, 458 (1962); P. G. Burke, A. Hibbert and W. D. Robb, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 4, 153 (1971).Google Scholar
- 11.E. M. Karule and R. K. Peterkop, Atomic Collisions III, ed. by V. Ia Veldre, Latvian Academy of Sciences, Riga, 1965 (Translation TT-66-12939 available through SLA Translation Center, John Crear Library, Chicago); p. 1-27 (inelastic and elastic collisions above ns-np threshold); E. M. Karule, ibid., p. 29–48 (elastic collisions below threshold).Google Scholar
- 12.P. G. Burke and A. J. Taylor, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys., 2, 869 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.D. W. Norcross, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 2, 1300 (1969); Corrig. 4, 628 (1971); 4, 1458 (1971); D. L. Moores and D. W. Norcross, J. Phys. B, in press [Tables of Li and Na elastic scattering results].Google Scholar
- 14.See M. J. Seaton in Atomic and Molecular Processes, reference 10.Google Scholar
- 15.U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 178, 131 (1969); V. W. Hughes, R. L. Long Jr., M. S. Lubell, M. Posner and W. Raith, Phys. Rev. 5, A195, (1972); G. Baum, M. S. Lubell and W. Raith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 267 (1970); also “Polarized Electrons”, W. Raith (reference 1).Google Scholar
- 16.Photodetachment of Li and Na, D. W. Norcross and D. L. Moores, these proceedings.Google Scholar
- 17.N. Fuetrier, H. Van Regemorter and V. K. Lan, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 4, 670 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.R. E. Collins, B. Bederson and M. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. 3, A1976 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.P. J. Visconti, J. A. Slevin and K. Rubin, Phys. Rev. 3 A1310 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Absolute Total Cross Sections for Electron Scattering by Light Alkalis, A. Kasdan, T. M. Miller and B. Bederson, Book of Abstracts, ICAP III (Boulder, 1972 ).Google Scholar
- 21.See, for example, K. Rubin, B. Bederson, M. Goldstein and R. E. Collins, Phys. Rev. 182, 201 (1969); Methods of Experimental Physics, edited by B. Bederson and W. L. Fite. (Academic Press, Inc., New York 1968) Vol. 7A, pp. 89–95; B. Bederson and L. J. Kieffer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 601 (1971) pp. 610–613.Google Scholar
- 22.R. B. Brode, Phys. Rev. 34, 673 (1929).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.It should also be noted that recent polarized-orbital calculations have also been reasonably successful in predicting total cross sections. For example, see Visconti etal [ref. 19] for a comparison of total e-Rb scattering with Balling’s polarized orbital calculation [ref. 17]. However it should be noted that the Balling calculation represents elastic scat¬tering only in this comparison.Google Scholar
- 24.W. Gehenn and M. Wilmers, Z. Physik 244, 395 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.D. Hils, M. V. McCusker, H. Kleinpoppen and S. J. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 398 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.The Gehenn and Wilmers results also agree very well, when normalized, to Karule and Peterkop, and to the old recoil data of Rubin etal [K. Rubin, J. Perel and B. Bederson, Phys. Rev., 117, 151 (I960)]. The “fine structure” shown in the 3 and 5 eV Rubin curves in the Gehenn and Wilmers paper are actually the forward scattering peaks in the 4s-4p excitation, and should not be included in the elastic plot [see Rubin, etal, reference 21]. Recently Gehenn and Reichert [W. Gehenn and E. Reichert, Z. Physik, in press] have performed similar measurements in sodium, with equally impressive agreement with close-coupling theory.Google Scholar
- 27.Actually the complete-story isn’t completely rosy. Slevin etal [J. A. Slevin, P. J. Visconti and K. Rubin, Phys. Rev. A5, 2065 (1971)], using a recoil technique involving detection of scattered atoms in two dimensions, obtain absolute elastic and inelastic cross sections over a wide range of energies and angles. The 3eV elastic data do not agree at all well with the data shown in Fig. 3.Google Scholar
- 28.E. Reichert, private communication.Google Scholar
- 29.E. Reichert and H. Deichsel, Phys. Lett. 25A, 560 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.K. Rubin, 4th International Conference on the Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, Quebec 1965 (Science Bookcrafters, Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.); A. E. Glassgold, Phys. Rev. 132, 2144 (1963); A. E. Glassgold and J. F. Walker, Phys. Rev. 160, 11 (1967).Google Scholar
- 31.The potential use of spin-exchange as a means of producing polarized electrons has been long recognized. See, for example, P. S. Farago in reference 1, also J. Byrne and P. S. Farago, Proc. Phys. Soc., Lond. 86, 801 (1965); R. J. Krisciokaitis and W. Y. Tsai, Nucl. Instrum. Meth., 83, 45 (1970); B. D. Obedkov and E. X. El-Mosallamu, Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, p. 43, ( 1971 No. 22); G. Drukarev, Seventh International Conference oil Physics of Electronic and Atomic Collisions, ( North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, 1971 ).Google Scholar
- 32.D. M. Campbell, H. M. Brash and P. S. Farago, Proc. Roy. Soc., in press [I am indebted to Professor Farago for sending me his results prior to publication].Google Scholar
- 33.F. G. Major and H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. 170, 91 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.H. G. Dehmelt, Phys. Rev. 109, 381 (1958); L. C. Balling and F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. 136, A46 (1964); L. C. Balling, Phys. Rev. 151, 1 (1966).Google Scholar
- 35.The exchange result reported in the pioneering paper of Dehmelt in 1958 (reference 34) was actually only an estimate of the cross section, and should not be considered to be a quantitative measurement.Google Scholar
- 36.H. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. 139, A1374 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.The Temperature Dependence of the Electron-Rubidium Spin- Exchange Cross Section, S. J. Davis and L. C. Balling, these proceedings.Google Scholar
- 38.L. C. Balling, R. J. Hanson and F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. 133, A607 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.D. Andrick, M. Eyb and H. Hofmann, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 5, L15 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.M. McCusker, private communication.Google Scholar
- 41.E. M. Karule and R. K. Peterkop, Latvijas PSR Zinatnu Akademijas Vestis, p. 3 ( 1971 No. 1).Google Scholar
- 42.See B. Bederson and L. J. Kieffer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 601 (1971); also L. J. Kieffer and G. H. Dunn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 1 (1966).Google Scholar
- 43.D. R. Flower and M. J. Seaton, Proc. Phys. Soc. 91, 59 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.E. A. Enemark and A. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A6, 192 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.G. N. Gould, Ph.D. Thesis, U. of New South Wales, 1970 (unpublished).Google Scholar
- 46.H. Hafner and H. Kleinpoppen, Z. Physik 198, 315 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.E. M. Karule, Latvijas PSR Zinatnu Akademijas Vestis, p. 9 ( 1970 No. 3).Google Scholar
- 48.N. Feutrier, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 3, L152 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.See Rubin etal, reference 21; H. Kleinpoppen, reference 1, B. Bederson, reference 1.Google Scholar
- 50.M. Goldstein, A. Kasdan and B. Bederson, Phys. Rev. A660 (1972).Google Scholar
- 51.V. I. Ochkur, Soviet Phys. - JETP 18, 503 (1964).Google Scholar
- 52.See B. Bederson and L. J. Kieffer, reference 42, also, “Survey of Electron-Cesium Collision Probabilities: Momentum Transfer Collisions”, J. A. Dayton, Jr., Lewis Research Center NASA report TMX-1897, Oct. 1969.Google Scholar
- 53.It should be noted that Kasdan, Miller and Bederson report on new total cross section measurements at this meeting on sodium and lithium. While the sodium results are in almost exact agreement with Moores and Norcross, the lithium results lie some 20 - 30% above the calculations. Norcross (private communication) believes this could be attributed to core correlation effects which are particularly difficult to take into account in lithium.Google Scholar
- 54.D. E. Pritchard, D. C. Burnham and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1363 (1967). For discussion of the theoretical problem of spin-exchange in alkali atom-atom collisions, see for example A. Dalgarno and M. R. H. Rudge, Proc. Roy. Soc. A286, 519 (1965); H. 0. Dickinson and M. R. H. Rudge, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 3, 1448 (1970).Google Scholar
- 55.H. G. Bennewitz and R. Haerten, Z. Phys. 227, 399 (1969); S. Stolte, J. Reuss and H. L. Schwartz, Physica 57, 254 (1972).Google Scholar
- 56.M. V. McCusker, L. L. Hatfield and G. K. Walters, Phys. Rev. A5, 177 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 57.J. C. Hill, L. L. Hatfield, N. D. Stockwell and G. K. Walters, Phys. Rev. A5, 189 (1972); see also the review talk “Polarization of Ions and Electrons by Optical Pumping Techniques”, L. D. Schearer, Atomic Physics 2 [ICAP II], edited by P. G. H. Sandars, ( Plenum Press, N.Y., 1971 ), p. 87.Google Scholar
- 58.B. Donnally and W. Sawyer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 439 (1965); ICPEAC VI, Mass. Inst, of Tech. Press (1969) p. 488.Google Scholar
- 59.P. Stehle, Phys. Rev. 110, 1458 (1958).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 60.E. Gerjuoy and F. Faisal, to be published.Google Scholar
- 61.D. Golden, private communication.Google Scholar
- 62.B. Bederson, Comments on Atomic and Molecular Physics, 1, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
- 63.A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973