Advertisement

Quark-Tasting with Neutrinos

  • A. De Rújula
Part of the Studies in the Natural Sciences book series (SNS, volume 11)

Abstract

I review the current situation in neutrino physics in the context of unified gauge theories, with room for heavy quarks that carry new flavor quantum numbers. The y-anomaly is strong evidence for the existence of right-handed currents and perhaps beauty. Dileptons are evidence for charm. The case for truth is less compelling. I study equal sign dileptons and their implications on a promising field of multilepton physics. Neutral currents, the hard-fact model and madness (nondiagonal neutral currents) are also among the topics discussed.

Keywords

Heavy Quark Vector Theory Neutral Current Vector Model Parton Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Footnotes

  1. 1.
    G. Snow, Nucl. Phys. B55, 191 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. De Rújula and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D9, 180 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. A. Paschos and V. A. Zacharov, Phys. Rev. D8, 215 (1973).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. De Rújula, G. Georgi, S. L. Glashow and H. Quinn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 391 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. De Rújula and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. 46B, 377 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. A. Beg and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 675 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M. A. Beg and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D8, 2334 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. M. A. Beg and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D9, 1572 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Beg and A. Zee, Riazzuddin and Fayyazuddin, Phys. Rev. D6, 2032 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. R. Budny and P. N. Sharback, Phys. Rev. D6, 3651 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. A. Love, D. V. Nanopolous and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B55, 33 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Tamura and K. Fujii, Progr. Theor. Phys. 49, 995 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 7.
    J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. 185, 1975 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. J. D. Bjorken and E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. D1, 3151 (1970).Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 1346 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Gross and P. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 1343 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Parisi, Phys. Letters 43B, 207 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. D. Gross, Phys. Rev. Letters 32, 1071 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. A. De Rújula, H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D10, 2141 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 9.
    Y. Watanabe et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 898 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Chang et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 901 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 11.
    H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer, Harvard preprints.Google Scholar
  23. 12.
    M. Barnett, Harvard preprints.Google Scholar
  24. 13.
    S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 19, 1264 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Salam in Ekernentany Pah.ticke Theoty, edited by N. Svartholm, Stockholm (1968).Google Scholar
  27. 14.
    S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970).Google Scholar
  28. 15.
    R. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D6, 2023 (1972).Google Scholar
  29. A. De Rújula, H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 69 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. A. De Rújula, H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D12, 3589 (1975).Google Scholar
  31. G. Branco, T. Hagiwara and R. N. Mohapatra, CCNYHEP7518 and C00–223B-84 (1975).Google Scholar
  32. G. Branco, T. Hagiwara and R. N. Mohapatra, These models have trouble with nonleptonic decays, see E. Golowich and B. R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 831 (1975).Google Scholar
  33. A. Fernandez-Pacheco, A. Morales, R. Nunez-Lagos and J. Sanchez-Guillén, GIFT report.Google Scholar
  34. 16.
    H. Fritzch, M. Gell-Mann and P. Minkowski, Phys. Letters 59B, 256 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. F. Wilczek, A. Zee, R. L. Kingsley and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev., to be published. Vector models have also been constructed by S. Pakvasa, W. A. Simmons and S. F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 702 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 17.
    F. Sciulli, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  37. 18.
    M. Gell-Mann, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  38. 19.
    A. Mann, these proceedings. A. Benvenutti et at., HPWF76–1, to be published.Google Scholar
  39. 20.
    H. D. Politzer, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  40. 22.
    E. D. Bloom and F. J. Gilman, Phys. Rev. D4, 2901 (1971).Google Scholar
  41. 23.
    R. P. Feynman, unpublished.Google Scholar
  42. F. Gursey and S. Orfanidis, Nuovo Cimento 11A, 225 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O. W. Greenberg and D. Bhaumic, Phys. Rev. D4, 2048 (1971).Google Scholar
  44. G. Domokos, Phys. Rev. D4, 3708 (1971).Google Scholar
  45. M. Briedenback and J. Kuti, unpublished.Google Scholar
  46. O. Nachtmann, Nucl. Phys. B63, 237 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. H. J. Schnitzer, Phys. Rev. D4, 1429 (1971).Google Scholar
  48. 24.
    Based on unpublished calculations by M. Barnett.Google Scholar
  49. 25.
    B. Aubert et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 984 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 26.
    T. Eichten et at., Phys. Letters 46B, 274 (1973).Google Scholar
  51. 29.
    V. Barger, T. Weiler and R. J. N. Phillips, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 692 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 32.
    C. Rubbia, Talk at the Palermo Conference. F. J. Scuilli, Talk at the APS Meeting in Seattle, 1975Google Scholar
  53. 33.
    FNAL-Michigan State Collaboration. Report of F. Roe at the Palmermo Conference.Google Scholar
  54. 34.
    A. Benvenutti et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1199, 1203, and 1249 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 36.
    Blietschau et at., CERN preprint.Google Scholar
  56. 37.
    A. Pais and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1206 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 38.
    L. M. Sehgal and P. M. Zerwas, Aachen preprint. J. LoSecco, Harvard preprint.Google Scholar
  58. 39.
    L. Ledermann, talk at the New York meeting of the APS (1976).Google Scholar
  59. 40.
    B. W. Lee, Report at the Conference on Gauge Theories and Modern Field Theory, Northeastern University, Boston, 1975.Google Scholar
  60. 41.
    T. Appelquist, A. De Rûjula, S. L. Glashow and D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 365 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 42.
    A. Pais and S. B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Letters, 35, 1556 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 43.
    A. De Rûjula et at., in Ref. 15.Google Scholar
  63. 44.
    D. C. Soreide et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 36, 352 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. M. A. Bouchiat and C. C. Bouchiat, Phys. Letters 48B, 111 (1974).Google Scholar
  65. M. A. Bouchiat and C. C. Bouchiat, J. Phys. (Paris) 35, 899 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. M. A. Bouchiat and C. C. Bouchiat, J. Phys. (Paris) 36, 93 (1975).Google Scholar
  67. P. G. H. Sandars in Atomic Phy4Lc.i 4, edited by G. zu Putlitz, E. W. Weber and A. Winnaker ( Plenum, N.Y. 1975 ).Google Scholar
  68. I. B. Khriplovich, JETP Letters 20, 315 (1974).Google Scholar
  69. 45.
    M. Perl et at., Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1489 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 46.
    S. Y. Park and A. Yildiz, to be published.Google Scholar
  71. 47.
    A. De Rújula, H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, unpublished.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. De Rújula
    • 1
  1. 1.The Physics LaboratoriesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations