Experimental Searches for Magnetic Monopoles

  • Ronald R. Ross
Part of the Studies in the Natural Sciences book series (SNS, volume 10)


Analysis of the sensitivity of previous negative searches for magnetic monopoles shows that they constitute prior evidence against the monopole interpretation of the event reported as “evidence for detection of a moving magnetic monopole.” The strength of the evidence varies with the unknown mass of the monopole. For M ≲ 105 GeV, odds are greater than 106: 1 against. For larger masses, the limits depend strongly on assumption about the range of monopoles and the threshold for detection of monopole tracks in obsidian. In no case are the odds less then 8: 1 and they may be no less than 8000: 1 against. Since the reported event may also be due to an electrically charged heavy particle, it is probably not due to a monopole.


Magnetic Charge Black Body Radiation Magnetic Monopole Experimental Search Lunar Sample 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. L. Fleischer, I. S. Jacobs, W. M. Schwarz, P. B. Price, and H. G. Goodwell, Phys. Rev. 177, 2029 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. R. L. Fleischer, H. R. Hart, Jr., I. S. Jacobs, P. B. Price, W. M. Schwarz, and F. Aumento, Phys. Rev. 184, 1393 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    H. H. Kolm, F. Villa, and A. Odian, Phys. Rev. D 4, 1285 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    P. H. Eberhard, R. R. Ross, L. W. Alvarez, and R. D. Watt, Phys, Rev. D 4, 3260 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. R. R. Ross, P. H. Eberhard, L. W. Alvarez, and R. D. Watt, Phys. Rev. D 8, 698 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 4.
    R. L. Fleischer, P. B. Price, and R. T. Woods, Phys. Rev. 1398 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. updated in R. L. Fleischer, H. R. Hart, Jr., I. S. Jacobs, P. B. Price, W. M. Schwarz, and R. T. Woods, Jour. of Appl. Phys. 41, 958 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    R. L. Fleischer, H. R. Hart, Jr., G. E. Nichols, and P. B. Price, Phys. Rev. D. 4, 24 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 6.
    P. B. Price, E. K. Shirk, W. Z. Osborne, L. S. Pinsky, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 487 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A133, 60 (1931). We write magnetic charge g = vg0 with g0 = 137e/2. g0 is the minimum charge predicted in Dirac’s theory.Google Scholar
  11. 8.
    L. W. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1126 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. E. V. Hungerfor, Phys. Rev. Letters 35, 1303 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. G. D. Badhwar, R. L. Golden, J. L. Lacy, S. A. Stephens, and T. Cleghorn, Phys. Rev. Letters 36, 120 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 9.
    W. Z. Osborne, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 1441 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 10.
    E. N. Parker, The Astrophysical Jour. 160, 383 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 11.
    E. Goto, J. Phys, Soc. Japan 13, 1413 (1958);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Goto, H. H. Kolm K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 132, 387 (1963);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. For an argument that is explicitly independent of the interaction of monopoles when they are inside the ferromagnetic material see P. H. Eberhard and R. R. Ross, LBL 4614, October 1975. Unpublished (submitted to Nuclear Phys. B).Google Scholar
  19. 12.
    L. W. Alvarez, M. Antuna, Jr., R. A. Byrns, P. H. Eberhard, R. E. Gilmer, E. H. Hoyer, R. R. Ross, H.H. Stellrecht, J. D. Taylor, and R. D. Watt, Rev. Sci. Instr. 43, 326 (1971);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. P. H. Eberhard, R. R. Ross, and J. D. Taylor, Rev. Sci. Instr. 46, 362 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 13.
    P. B. Price, private communication.Google Scholar
  22. 14.
    P. B. Price, following paper at this conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald R. Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations