Advertisement

On Predation, Competition, and the Advantages of Group Living

  • Daniel I. Rubenstein
Part of the Perspectives in Ethology book series (PEIE, volume 3)

Abstract

Many evolutionary reasons have been suggested as to why animals live in groups. Based on the costs and benefits associated with group living it appears that the risk of predation and the competitively induced need to forage efficiently are the most important forces responsible for the formation and maintenance of groups.

Most field studies and mathematical models that have investigated the environmental conditions that favor the formation of groups have studied the effects of either predation or competition. After examining some of these studies and their major conclusions, I present a model, based on the theory of games, that focuses on the combined action of predation and competition. Simulations under a variety of environmental conditions reveal that individuals that are poor competitors are more likely to remain in groups when the visibility of the habitat is low, when the level of competitive inequality among group members is low, when the carrying capacity of the habitat is high, and when the presence of neighbors enhances an individual’s feeding success.

Models, such as this one, that incorporate the effects of predation and resource competition, while accounting for how differences in age, sex, size, and past experience influence competitive ability, provide insights into the dynamics of social behavior. When other factors, such as kinship relationships and subtle interspecific interactions, are also considered, a general and predictive theory of social organization can be developed.

Keywords

Inclusive Fitness Evolutionary Stable Strategy Group Living Prey Animal Feeding Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, R. D. (1974). The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:325–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, J. L. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bull. 76:160–169.Google Scholar
  3. Charnov, E. L. (1977). An elementary treatment of the genetical theory of kin-selection. J. Theor. Biol. 66:541–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Emlen, S. T. (1975). Adaptive significance of synchronized breeding in a colonial bird: A new hypothesis. Science 188:1029–1031.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill, E. B., and Wolf, L. L. (1975). Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology 36:333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, I and II. J. Theor. Biol. 7:1–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton, W. D. (1971). Geometry for the selfish herd. J. Theor. Biol. 31:295–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoogland, J. L., and Sherman, P. W. (1976). Advantages and disadvantages of bank swallow (Riparia Riparia) coloniality. Ecol. Monogr. 46:33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Horn, H. S. (1968). The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer’s blackbird (Euphagus cyanocephalus). Ecology 49:682–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krebs, J. R. (1974). Colonial nesting and social feeding as strategies for exploiting food resources in the great blue heron (Ardea herodias). Behaviour 51:99–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krebs, J. R., MacRoberts, M. H., and Cullen, J. M. (1972). Flocking and feeding in the great Parus major—An experimental study. Behaviour 114:507–530.Google Scholar
  12. Kruuk, H. (1972). The Spotted Hyena. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Maynard Smith, J. (1976). Evolution and the theory of games. Am. Sci. 64:41–45.Google Scholar
  14. Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental investment: A prospective analysis. Anim. Behav. 25:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McFarland, D. J. (1976). Form and function in the temporal organisation of behaviour. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. A. (Eds.), Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 55–93.Google Scholar
  16. Morse, D. H. (1970). Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecol. Monogr. 40:117–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murton, R. K. (1971a). The significance of a specific search image in the feeding behavior of the wood pigeon. Behaviour 39:10–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murton, R. K. (1971b). Why do some birds feed in flocks? Behaviour 113:534–536.Google Scholar
  19. Pulliam, H. R. (1973). On the advantages of flocking. J. Theor. Biol. 38:419–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pulliam, H. R. (1976). The principle of optimal behavior and the theory of communities. Perspect. Ethol. 3:311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubenstein, D. I., Barnett, R. J., Ridgely, R. S., and Klopfer, P. H. (1977). Adaptive advantages of mixed-species feeding flocks among seed-eating finches in Costa Rica. Perspect. Ethol. 119:10–21.Google Scholar
  22. Schaller, G. (1972). The Serengeti Lion. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Tinbergen, N., Broekhuysen, G. J., Feekes, F., Houghton, J. C. W., Kruuk, H., and Szulc, E. (1962). Egg shell removal by the black-headed gull, Larus ridibundus L: A behavior component of camouflage. Behaviour 19:74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Treisman, M. (1975a). Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I: Models for concealment and evasion. Anim. Behav. 23:779–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Treisman, M. (1975b). Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. II: An economic model for predator-prey interaction. Anim. Behav. 23:801–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vine, I. (1971). Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 30:405–422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ward, P., and Zahavi, A. (1973). The importance of certain assemblages of birds as “information-centres” for food-finding. J. Theor. Biol. 115:517–534.Google Scholar
  28. Willis, E. O. (1966). Interspecific competition and the foraging behavior of plain-brown wood creepers. Ecology 47:667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zahavi, A. (1971). The social behaviour of white wagtail Motacilla alba alba wintering in Israel. Ecology 113:203–211.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel I. Rubenstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations