The Exploitation of Natural Genetic Variability for the Improvement of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

  • A. K. Auckland
  • K. B. Singh
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 8)


The two main types of cultivated chickpeas of interest to plant breeders are the small-seeded desi types adapted to “winter” (Oct./Nov.) plantings in eastern Asia and the large-seeded kabuli types adapted to “summer” (Mar./Apr.) plantings in western Asia. These two types have most probably been separated for thousands of years. The total world area under chickpea cultivation is about 10.5 million hectares. India, Pakistan, and Ethiopia produce 74, 10, and 4% of the world’s crop, respectively. The world’s average productivity at approximately 710 kg/ha is very low. Breeding programs have to date made little impact on yield improvement, and most farmers continue to grow ancient land races on soils of low fertility and under rainfed conditions. ICRISAT began a breeding program in 1973 with the aim of producing elite lines and segregating populations to strengthen national and regional programs for the chickpea-growing countries of the world. Classic and recurrent selection breeding methodologies are being employed. In India, the breeding program of ICRISAT is carried out at Hyderabad (lat. 17°N) and at Hissar (lat. 29.5°N). In 1975 a “summer,” off-season (for India) nursery was grown in Lebanon. The crop in Lebanon proved highly informative with regard to divergencies between kabuli and desi types. Adaptability of coadaptation appears to be most important in chickpeas. Transgressive segregation is greater in kabuli X desi crosses than between same-group crosses. The introgression of kabuli germ plasm into desi germ plasm is important for the improvement of the desi crop in eastern Asia and the introgression of desi germ plasm into kabuli germ plasm for the improvement of the kabuli crop in western Asia. A superior cultivar for eastern Asia is more likely to be produced from a (kabuli X desi) X desi backcross and for western Asia by a (kabuli X desi) X kabuli backcross. Whereas initial gains are more likely to come from intraspecific hybridization, current evidence suggests the potential importance of interspecific hybridization involving Cicer arietinum and C. reticulatum. Cytogenetic studies of hybrids between cultivars of Cicer arietinum and C. reticulatum indicate chromosome repatterning within C. arietinum, which may indicate cytogenetic differences between cultivar groups within the cultivated species.


Transgressive Segregation Germ Plasm Cicer Arietinum Paracentric Inversion Intraspecific Hybridization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Frey, K. J. (1975). Breeding concepts and techniques for self pollinated crops. In International Workshop on Grain Legumes, pp. 257–278. ICRISAT, India.Google Scholar
  2. Hanson, W. D. (1959). The breaking of initial linkage blocks under selected mating systems. Genetics 44: 857–868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Helbaek, H. (1970). The plant husbandry at Hacilar. In Excavations at Hacilar ( Mellart, J., ed.), pp. 189–191. Edinburgh Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  4. Jensen, N. F. (1970). A diallel selective mating system for cereal breeding. Crop Sci. 10: 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ladizinsky, G. (1975). A new Cicer from Turkey. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinb. 34: 201–202.Google Scholar
  6. Ladizinsky, G. and Adler, A. (1975). The origin of Chickpea as indicated by seed protein electrophoresis. Isr. J. Bot. 24: 183–189.Google Scholar
  7. Ladizinsky, G. and Adler, A. (1976). The origin of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. Euphytica 25: 211–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lawrence, P. (1974). Introgression of exotic germplasm into oat breeding populations. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Iowa State Univ. Library, Ames, Ia.Google Scholar
  9. Redden, R. J. and Jensen, N. F. (1974). Mass selection and mating systems in cereals. Crop Sci. 14: 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sandhu, T. S., Singh, K. B., and Singh, H. (1975). L550: A new Kabuli gram. Indian Farm. 24: 21.Google Scholar
  11. Singh, K. B., and Auckland, A. K. (1975). Chickpea breeding at ICRISAT. In International Workshop on Grain Legumes, pp. 3–17. ICRISAT.Google Scholar
  12. Sturtevant, A. H. (1938). On the origin of interspecific sterility. Quart. Rev. Biol. 13: 333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van der Maesen, L. J. G. (1972). Cicer L.—A monograph of the Genus with Special Reference to the Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Veenman and Zoren, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  14. Van der Maesen, L. J. G. (1973). Chickpea: Distribution of variability. In Survey of Crop Genetic Resources in their centres of Diversity. ( O. H. Frankel, ed.), pp. 30–34. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  15. Wallace, W. H. (1963). Modes of reproduction. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding (Publ. 982 ). Natl. Acad. Sciences, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Auckland
    • 1
  • K. B. Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Semi-Arid TropicsInternational Crops Research InstituteHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations