Breeding for Specific Amino Acids

  • Oliver E. NelsonJr.
Part of the Basic Life Sciences book series (BLSC, volume 2)


The demonstration that single-gene substitutions can result in marked increases in the content of the limiting essential amino acids for nutrition of humans or monogastric animals has been made for maize (6,12) and barley (9). It is then naturally a question of the extent of our ability to manipulate the amino acid content of economically important plants. Could one enhance the content of any desired amino acid in any plant tissue? The answer to this question clearly is negative, and the reasons for so concluding are the subject of this chapter. They constitute an essential background for any investigator interested in the improvement of plant protein quality. Understanding the severe restrictions on the system allows a reasonable estimation of the probability of success. The restrictions to which I refer take this form: The primary sequence (the order of amino acids) of a polypeptide chain is specified by the structural gene for that polypeptide in the DNA codescript. Decoding takes place through transcription into an RNA intermediate and translation into a polypeptide chain via ribosome-based protein synthesis. Because the sequence is specified, polypeptide chains synthesized on the same RNA message are identical, barring the occurrence of relatively infrequent mistakes in translation.


Amino Acid Composition Lysine Content Monogastric Animal High Lysine Endosperm Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brock, R. D., Friederich, E. A., and Langridge, J. (1972). The modification of amino acid composition of higher plants by mutation and selection. In Proceedings of the FAO/IAEAIGSF Meeting on Nuclear Techniques for Seed Protein Improvement, Neuherberg, June 26–30, 1972, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 329–338.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doll, H. (1971). Variation in protein quantity and quality induced in barley by EMS treatment. In Proceedings of the Latin America Meeting on Induced Mutations and Plant Improvement,IAEA/FAO, Vienna.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ingversen, J., Andersen, A. J., Doll, H., and Köie, B. (1972). Selection and properties of high lysine barleys. In Proceedings of the FAOIIAEAIGSF Meeting on Nuclear Techniques for Seed Protein Improvement, Neuherberg, June 26–30, 1972, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiménez, J. R. (1966). Protein fractionation studies of high lysine corn. In Mertz, E. T., and Nelson, O. E. (eds.), Proceedings of the High Lysine Corn Conference, Corn Industries Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., pp. 74–79.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McWhirter, K. S. (1971). A floury endosperm, high lysine locus on chromosome 10. Maize Genet. Coop. News Letter 45: 184.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mertz, E. T., Bates, L. S., and Nelson, O. E. (1964). Mutant gene that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm. Science 145: 279–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Misra, P. S., et al. (1972). Endosperm protein synthesis in maize with increased lysine content. Science 176: 1425–1426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mossé, J. (1966). Alcohol-soluble proteins of cereal grains. Fed Proc. 25: 1663–1669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Munck, L. (1972). Barley seed proteins. In Proceedings of the American Chemical Society Symposium on Seed Proteins, Los Angeles, March 29, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munck, L., Karlsson, K. E., Hagberg, A., and Eggum, B. O. (1970). Gene for improved nutritional value in barley seed protein. Science 168: 985–987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson, O. E. (1969). Genetic modification of protein quality in plants. Advan. Agron. 21: 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson, O. E., Mertz, E. T., and Bates, L. S. (1965). Second mutant gene affecting the amino acid pattern of maize endosperm proteins. Science 150: 1469–1470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborne, T. B. (1924). The Vegetable Proteins, 2nd ed., Longmans, Green, New York.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osborne, T. B., and Leavenworth, C. S. (1913). Do gliadin and zein yield lysine on hydrolysis? J. Biol. Chem. 14: 481–487.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osborne, T. B., and Mendel, L. (1914). Nutritive properties of proteins of the maize kernel. J. Biol. Chem. 18: 1–6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osborne, T. B., and Mendel, L. (1916). The amino-acid minimum for maintenance and growth as exemplified by further experiments with lysine and tryptophane. J. Biol. Chem. 25: 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sodek, L., and Wilson, C. M. (1970). Incorporation of leucine-14C and lysine- “C into protein in the developing endosperm of normal and opaque-2 corn. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 140: 29–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Widholm, J. M. (1972). Cultured Nicotiana tabacum cells with an altered anthranilate synthetase which is less sensitive to feedback inhibition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 261: 52–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolf, M. J., Cutler, H. C., Zuber, M. S., and Khoo, U. (1972). Maize with multilayer aleurone of high protein content. Crop. Sci. 12: 440–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver E. NelsonJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of GeneticsUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations