Transport Properties of Oriented Poly(Vinyl Chloride)

  • Thomas E. Brady
  • Saleh A. Jabarin
  • Gerald W. Miller
Part of the Polymer Science and Technology book series (PST, volume 6)


In commercial thermoplastic forming operations, poly(vinyl chloride), or PVC, is stretched to several times its original dimensions at fixed rates and temperatures. The stretching operation is usually followed by rapid quenching which freezes in the strain-orientation imparted to the polymer during forming. Since orientation is known to strongly influence physical properties, it was of interest to correlate several critical end-use properties with the range of processing conditions which PVC might experience during a typical forming operation. In addition to mechanical strength, gas and vapor transport are perhaps the most critical properties from the packager’s point of view. This report describes the influence of 1) degree of biaxial orientation, 2) stretching rate, and 3) stretching temperature on the oxygen and water vapor transport parameters of non-impact modified PVC. The diffusion and solubility coefficients, as well as permeability, were determined for oxygen transport, while only equilibrium permeability was measured for water vapor. Structural changes were monitored by measuring both birefringence and density as a function of orientation. Since processing temperature was found to have a pronounced effect on properties, separate annealing studies were carried out, where variations in the transport properties were correlated with structural changes as measured by both x-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry, DSC.


Planar Strain Vinyl Chloride Water Vapor Permeability Oxygen Permeability Water Vapor Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Y. Ito, Kobunshi Kagaku, 18, 6 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. W. Lasoski and W. H. Cobbs, J. Polymer Sci., 36, 21 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. S. Michaels and R. W. Hausselein, J. Polymer Sci., Pt-C, 10, 6 (1965).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Ito, Kobunshi Kagaku, 19, 412 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. W. Brand, J. Polymer Sci., 41, 415 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. A. Meinecke and D. V. Mehta, ACS Polymer Preprints, 12 (2), 104 (Sept. 1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibid., 12 (2), 111 (Sept. 1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. R. Vieth, E. S. Matulevicius and S. R. Mitchell, Kolloid-Z, 220 (1), 49 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. A. Pasternak, J. F. Schimscheimer and J. Heller, J. Polymer Sci., Pt-A2, 8, 467 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Crank and G. S. Park, ed., Diffusion in Polymers, Academic Press (New York, 1968 ).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Okajima and Y. Koizumi, Kogyo Kagaku Zusshi, 42, 810 (1939).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. W. Schael, J. Appl. Polymer Sci., 8, 2717 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Matsumoto, S. Utsuromiya and R. I. Mamura, Sen-I-Gakkaishi, 26, 303 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. S. Stein, Newer Methods of Polymer Characterization, Chapter 4, B. Ke, ed., Wiley Interscience (New York, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. H. Illers, Makromol. Chem., 127, 1 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. L. Lippert, Jr., Paper presented at the American Physical Society Meeting, San Diego, California, March, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas E. Brady
    • 1
  • Saleh A. Jabarin
    • 1
  • Gerald W. Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.Owens-Illinois Technical CenterToledoUSA

Personalised recommendations