Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Urea-Urethane Block Polymers

  • J. L. Work
Part of the Polymer Science and Technology book series (POLS, volume 4)


Segmented polyurethanes containing different molecular weight glycols and urea-urethane block polymers have been the subject of numerous investigations in the past decade (1–16). The results of these investigations indicate clearly that these polymers form highly aggregated structures. If the aggregation occurs preferentially between certain segments in the macromolecule , concentration gradients arise in the polymer which should eventually lead to the formation of domains of the type observed in ABA-type block polymers (17). Only recently has a domain structure been directly observed in these systems (10,19,20). The domains are much smaller than those observed in the styrene-butadiene block polymers and, therefore, are more poorly defined. This probably occurs because the block lengths are shorter and more dispersed in size in the urethane system than they are in the styrene-butadiene system.


Block Length Dynamic Mechanical Property Domain Formation Cyclohexyl Amine Block Polymer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. W. Seymour, G. M. Estes, and S. L. Cooper, Macroraolecules, 3, 579 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Estes, R. W. Seymour, and S. L. Cooper, Macromolecules, 4, 452 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. S. Huh and S. L. Cooper, Polym. Eng. Sci., 11, 369 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Bonart, L. Morbitzer, and H. Rinke, Kolloid-Z. u. Z. Polymere, 240, 807 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. L. Illinger, N. S. Schneider, and F. E. Karasz, Polym. Eng. Sci., 12, 25 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Kajiyama and W. J. MacKnight, Trans. Soc. of Rheo., 13, 527 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. J. Havlik and T. L. Smith, J. Polymer Sci., Part A, 2, 539 (1964).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. M. North, J. C. Reid, and J. B. Shortall, Eur. Polymer J., 5, 565 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. W. Seymour, G. M. Estes, D. S. Huh, and S. L. Cooper, J. Polymer Sci., Part A-2, 10, 1521 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. L. Samuels and G. L. Wilkes, J. Polymer Sci., Part B, 9, 761 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. M. Estes, S. L. Cooper, and A. V. Tobolsky, J. Macromol. Sci., C4, 313 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Bonart, L. Morbitzer, and G. Hentze, J. Macromol. Sci., 133, 337 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Kajiyama and W. J. MacKnight, Macromol., 2, 245 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. l4.
    J. Stoelting, F. E. Karasz, and W. J. MacKnight, Polym. Eng. Sci., 10, 133 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. B. Clough and N. S. Schneider, J. Macromol. Sci., B2, 553 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. B. Clough, N. S. Schneider, and A. O. King, J. Macromol. Sci., B2, 641 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Soen, T. Inoue, M. Katsumori, and H. Kawai, J. Polym. Sci. Part A2, 10, 1757 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    W. R. Sorensen and T. W. Campbell, Preparative Methods of Polymer Chemistry, pp. 138, Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. A. Koutsky, N. V. Hien, and S. L. Cooper, J. Polym, Sci., Part B, 8, 353 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. E. Wilkes and C. S. Yusek, J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys., B7, 157 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. L. Harrell, Macromolecules, 2, 607 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. E. Nielsen, Mechanical Properties of Polymers, Van Nostrand and Reinhold, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    F. Bueche, Physical Properties of Polymers, Chap. 5, Interscience, New York (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Work
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Development CenterArmstrong Cork CompanyLancasterUSA

Personalised recommendations