Advertisement

Behavioral Chemicals in the Augmentation of Natural Enemies

  • S. Bradleigh Vinson
Part of the Environmental Science Research book series (ESRH, volume 11)

Abstract

The behavioral manipulation of natural enemies of pest insects has been a long standing dream among the biological control practitioners. Recent work concerning the behavior of some natural enemies of pest insects suggests that this dream may become a practical reality. Wright (1964, 1965) recognized the potential for pest management by the behavioral modification of insects through the use of non-toxic agents that modify the insects’ behavior. As stated by Wright (1965) these chemicals may effect control of a pest by inhibiting a correct response or eliciting an incorrect one. He coined the term “metarchon” for the introduced stimulus which includes chemical repellents and attractants as well as physical factors such as light and sound which interfere with the insects ability to communicate. While much effort is underway to develop methods of manipulating the pest insect, a different approach is needed for the manipulation of natural enemies. Instead of attempting to elicit an incorrect response or inhibit a correct one, the goal of entomophagous insect manipulation is to redirect or stimulate the response. The behavioral modification of certain arthropod enemies of insects through the use of chemicals has opened up new opportunities for the manipulation of these arthropods for the benefit of man. However, such an approach requires a working understanding of the behavior of entomophagous arthropods and the role played by chemicals in their behavioral patterns.

Keywords

Natural Enemy Gypsy Moth Host Selection Boll Weevil Host Acceptance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Alcock, J. 1973. Cues used in searching for food by red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behaviour 46: 174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alloway, T. M. 1973. Learning in insects except apoidea. pp. 131–71. In Invertebrate Learning. Vol. 1. [W. C. Corning; J. A. Dayal and A. O. D. Willows, Eds.] Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, A. P. 1962. Influence of host tree on abundance of Itoplectis conquisitor (Say), a polyphagous parasite of the European shoot moth Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.). Can. Entomol. 94: 337–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, A. P. 1966. Associative Learning in Itoplectis con-quisitor (Say). Can. Entomol. 98: 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur, A. P. 1967. Influences of position and size of host on host searching by Itoplectis conquisitor. Can. Entomol. 99: 877–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthur, A. P. 1971. Associate learning by Nemeritis canes cens. Can. Entomol. 103: 1137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur, A. P., C. M. Hegdekar, and C. Rollins. 1969. Component of the host hemolymph that induces oviposition in a parasitic insect. Nature 223: 966–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arthur, A. P., C. M. Hegdekar, and W. W. Batsch. 1972. A chemically defined synthetic medium that induces oviposition in the parasite Itoplectis conquisitor. Can. Entomol. 104: 1251–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arthur, A. P., J. E. R. Stainer, and A. L. Turnbull. 1964. The interaction between Orgilus obscurator (Nees) and Temelucha (Grav.), parasites of the pine shoot moth Rhyacionia buoliana (Schiff.). Can. Entomol. 96: 1030–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashley, T. R., J. C. Allen, and D. Gonzales. 1974. Successful parasitization of Eeliothis zea and Trichoplusia ni. eggs by Trichograrnmma. Environ. Entomol. 3: 319–22.Google Scholar
  11. Askew, R. R. 1966. On the biology of the inhabitants of oak galls of Cynipidae (Hymenoptera) in Britain. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 14: 237–68.Google Scholar
  12. Baier, M. 1964. Zer Biologie and Grodologie des Sattelmucke Haplodiplosis equestris Wagener. Z. Angew. Ent. 53: 217–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bakker, C;., S. N. Bagchee, W. R. Van Swet, and E. Meelis. 1967. Host discrimination in Pseudeuoolia boohei. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 10: 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bartlett, B. R. 1953. A tactile ovipositional stimulus to culture Maorooentrus aneylivorus on an unnatural host. J. Econ. Ento-mol. 46: 525.Google Scholar
  15. Blum, M. S. 1974. Pheromonal sociality in the hymenoptera. pp. 222–49. In Pheromones [M. C. Birch, Ed.]. American Elsevier Pub., New York, 495 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Bosch, van den, R., and A. D. Telford. 1964. Environmental modification and biological control, pp. 459–88. In Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. [P. DeBach, Ed]. Chapman and Hall, London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Bragg, D. 1974. Ecological and behavioral studies of Phaeogenes eynarae: Ecology; host specificity; search and oviposition; and avoidance of super-parasitism. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 931–36.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, W. L., Jr., T. Eisner and R. H. Whittaker. 1970. Allomones and kairomones: Transpecific chemical messengers. Bioscience 20: 21–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cade, W. 1975. Acoustically orienting parasitoids: Fly phono- taxis to cricket song. Science 190: 1312–3.Google Scholar
  20. Calvert, D. 1973. Experimental host Preference of Monoctonus paulensis, including a hypothetical scheme of host selection. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 66: 28–33.Google Scholar
  21. Camors, F. B. Jr., and T. L. Payne. 1971. Response in Heydenia unica to Dendroetonus frontalis pheromones and a host-tree terpene. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 31–3.Google Scholar
  22. Camors, F. C., Jr., and T. L. Payne. 1973. Sequence of arrival of entomophagous insects to trees infested with the southern pine beetle. Environ. Entomol. 2: 267–70.Google Scholar
  23. Carton, Y. 1974. Biologie de Pimpla instigator III Analyse experimentale du processus de reconnaissance de l’hotechyr- solida. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17: 265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chabora, P. C. 1967. Hereditary behavior variation in oviposition patterns in the parasite Nasonia vitripennis. Can. Entomol. 99: 763–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clausen, C. P. 1940. Entomophagous Insects. McGraw-Hill: New York. 688 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Clausen, C. P., H. A. Jaynes and T. R. Gardner. 1933. Further investigations of the parasites of Popillia jccponioa in the far east. U.S. Dept. of Agric. Tech. Bull. 366. 58 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Corbet, S. A. 1971. Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the flour moth, Anagasta kuehniella, contains an epidemic pheromone and elicits oviposition movements in a hymenopteran parasite. Nature 232: 481–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Corbet, P. S., C. Longfield and N. W. Moore. 1960. Dragonflies. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  29. Cross, W. W. and T. L. Chesnut. 1971. Arthropod parasites of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis: 1. An annotated list. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 64: 516–27.Google Scholar
  30. Croze, H. 1970. Searching Image in Carrion Crows. Parey, Berlin. 86 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Cushman, R. A. 1926. Location of individual hosts versus systematic relation of host species as a determing factor in parasite attack. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 28: 5–6.Google Scholar
  32. DeBach, P. 1949. Population studies of the long-tailed mealybug and its natural enemies on citrus trees in southern California, 1949. Ecology 30: 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. DeBach, P. 1964. Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Chapman and Hall, Ltd. London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
  34. DeBach, P. and K. S. Hagen. 1964. Manipulation of entomophagous species, pp. 429–58. In Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. [P. DeBach, Ed]. Chapman and Hall, London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Dodd, A. P. 1953. Observations on the stem gall-fly of Pamekani, Eupatorium glandulosum. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 15: 41–4.Google Scholar
  36. Doutt, R. L. 1957. Biology of Solenotus begini (Ashmead). J. Econ. Entomol. 50: 373–4.Google Scholar
  37. Doutt, R. L. 1964. Biological characteristics of entomophagous adults, pp. 145–67. In Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds [P. DeBach, Ed.]. Chapman and Hall, London. 844 pp.Google Scholar
  38. Edwards, R. L. 1954. The host-finding and oviposition behavior of Mormoniella vitripennis (Walker), a parasite of muscoid flies. Behavior 7: 88–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Edwards, R. L. 1955. How the hymenopteran parasite Mormoniella vitripennis (Walker) finds its host. Bri. J. Anim. Behav. 3: 37–8.Google Scholar
  40. Farkas, S. R. and H. H. Shorey. 1974. Mechanisms of orientation to a distant pheromone source, pp. 81–95. In Pheromones. [M. C. Birch, Ed]. American Elsevier Pub. Co. N.Y. 495 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Fleschner, C. A. 1950. Studies on searching capacity of the larvae of three predators of the citrus red mite. Hilgardia 20: 233–65.Google Scholar
  42. Finney, G. L. 1948. Culturing Chrysopa aalifornica and obtaining eggs for field distribution. J. Econ. Entomol. 41: 719–21.Google Scholar
  43. Fisher, R. C. 1961. A study in insect multiparasitism. I. Host selection and oviposition. J. Exp. Biol. 38: 267–75.Google Scholar
  44. Fisher, R. C. 1971. Aspects of the physiology of endoparasitic hymenoptera. Cambridge Phil. Soc. Biol. Rev. 46: 243–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Flanders, S. E. 1953. Variations in susceptibility of citrus- infesting coccids to parasitization. J. Econ. Entomol. 46: 266–69.Google Scholar
  46. Gerling, D. and A. Schwartz. 1974. Host selection by Telonorrrus rernuSj a parasite of Spodoptera littoralis eggs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17: 391–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gordh, G. 1973. Biological investigations on Comperia meroeti (Compere), an encyritid parasite of the cockroach Supella longepalpa (Serville). J. Econ. Entomol. Ser. A 47: 115–27.Google Scholar
  48. Greany, P. D. and E. R. Oatman. 1971a. Demonstration of host discrimination in the parasite Orgilus lepidus. Ann, Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 375–6.Google Scholar
  49. Greany, P. D. and E. R. Oatman. 1971b. Analysis of host discrim-ination in the parasite Ovgilus lepidus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 377–83.Google Scholar
  50. Greany, P. D., J. H. Tumlinson, D. L. Chambers and G. M. Boush. 1977. Chemically-mediated host finding by Biosteres (Opius) longicaudatusл a parasitoid of tephritid fruit fly larvae. J. Chem. Ecol. 3: 189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Granett, J. and N. C. Leeling. 1971. A hyperglycemic agent in the serum of DDT - prostrate American cockroaches, Periplaneta americana. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 65: 299–302.Google Scholar
  52. Griffiths, K. J. 1971. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized hosts by Pleolophus basizonus. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Ont. 102: 83–91.Google Scholar
  53. Gross, H. R., W. J. Lewis, and R. L. Jones. 1975. Kairomones and their use in the management of entomophagous insects. III. Stimulation of Trichogramma achaeaer T. pretiosum and Micropli- tis croceipes with host-seeking stimuli at time of release to improve their efficiency. J. Chem. Ecology. 1: 431–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Guillot, F. S. and S. B. Vinson. 1972. Sources of substances which elicit a behavioral response from the insect parasitoid, Carrrpo- letis perdis tinetus. Nature 235: 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Guillot, F. S., R. L. Joiner, and S. B. Vinson. 1974. Host discrim-ination: isolation of hydrocarbons from Dufour’s gland of a braconid parasitoid. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 720–1.Google Scholar
  56. Gutierrez, A. P. 1970. Studies on host selection and host specificity of the aphid hyperparasite Charips victrix. 6. Description of sensory sturctures and a synopsis of host selection and host specificity. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63: 1705–9.Google Scholar
  57. Hagen, K. S. 1950. Fecundity of Chrysopa califomica as affected by synthetic foods. J. Econ. Entomol. 43:101–4. RGoogle Scholar
  58. Hagen, K. S. and R. L. Tassan. 1970. The influence of food Wheast and related Saccharomyces fragilis yeast products in the fecundity of Chrysopa cornea. Can. Entomol. 102: 806–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hagen, K. S., E. F. Sawall, Jr., and R. L. Tassan. 1970. The use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects. Proc. Tall Timb. Conf. Ecol. An. Hab. Mat. 2: 59–81.Google Scholar
  60. Hagen, K. S., P. Greany, E. F. Sawall, Jr. and R. L. Tassan. 1976. Tryptophan in artificial honeydews or a source of an attractant for adult Chrysopa cornea. Environ. Entomol. (in press).Google Scholar
  61. Hassell, M. P. 1968. The behavioral response of a tachinid fly [Cyzenis albicans (Fall.)] to its host, the winter moth [Operophtera brumata (L.)]. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 627–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hawke, S. D., R. D. Farley, and P. D. Greany. 1973. The fine structure of sense organs in the ovipositor of the parasitic wasp. Tissue Cell 5: 171–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hays, D. B. and S. B. Vinson. 1971. Host acceptance by the parasite Cardiochiles nigriceps Viereck. Anim. Behav. 19: 344–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hegdekar, C. M. and A. P. Arthur. 1973. Host hemolymph chemicals that induce oviposition in the parasite Itopleotis oonquisitor. Can. Entomol. 105: 787–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hendry, L. C., P. D. Greany, and R. J. Gill. 1973. Kairomone mediated host-finding behavior in the parasitic wasp Orgilus lepidus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 16: 471–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Henson, R. D., S. B. Vinson, and C. S. Barfield. 1977. Oppositional behavior of Braaon mellitor Say, a parasitoid of the boll weevil. III. Isolation and identification of natural releases of oviposition probing. J. Chem. Ecol. 3: 151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Herrebout, W. M. and J. van den Veer. 1969. Habitat selection in Eucarcelis retilla Vill. III. Preliminary results of olfacto-meter experiments with females of known age. Z. Angew. Entomol. 64: 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hô’lldobler, C. 1969. Host finding of odor in the myrmercophilis beetle Atemeles pubicollis Bris. (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae). Science 166: 757–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hoefer, I. and M. Lindauer. 1975. Das lernverhalten zwier bien- enrassen unter verânderten orientierungsbedingungen. J. Cотр. Physiol. 99: 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hoefer, I. and M. Lindauer. 1976. Der einfluss einer vordressur auf das lernverhalten der honigbiene. J. Cотр. Physiol. 109: 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hsiao, T., F. G. Holdaway, and C. H. Chang. 1966. Ecological and physiological adaptations in insect parasitism. Entomol. Exp. A. pp. 9: 113–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jacobson, M. 1972. Insect Sex Pheromones. Academic Press, New York 382 pp.Google Scholar
  73. Jones, R. L., W. J. Lewis,, M. C. Bowman, M. Beroza, and B. A. Bierl. 1971. Host-seeking stimulant for parasite of corn earworm: isolation identification, and synthesis. Science 173: 842–3.Google Scholar
  74. Jones, R. L., W. J. Lewis, M. Beroza, B. A. Bierl, and A. N. Sparks. 1973. Host-seeking stimulants (kairomones) for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanesoens. Environ. Entomol. 2: 593–6.Google Scholar
  75. Jones, R. L., W. J. Lewis, H. R. Gross, Jr., and D. A. Nordland. 1976. Use of kairomones to promote action by beneficial insect parasites, pp. 119–34. In Pest Management With Insect Sex Attractants. [M. Beroza, Ed] Acs symposium series. 23.Google Scholar
  76. Labeyrie, V. 1958. Facteurs conditionnant la ponte de Microgaster globatus Nees. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 63: 62–6.Google Scholar
  77. Lenteren, J. C. van. 1976. The development of host discrimination and the prevention of superparasitism in the parasite Pseudeucoila boohei Weld. (Hym.:Cynipidae). Neth. J. Zool. 26: 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lewis, W. J. and S. B. Vinson. 1971. Suitability of certain Heliothis as hosts the parasite Cardioohiles nigriceps. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 970–2.Google Scholar
  79. Lewis, W. J., J. W. Snow and R. L. Jones. 1970. A pheromone trap for studying populations of Cardioehiles nigriceps, a parasite of Heliothis vireseens. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 1417–21.Google Scholar
  80. Lewis, W. J. and R. L. Jones. 1971. Substance that stimulates host-seeking by Microplitis croceipes, a parasite of Heliothis species. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 471–3.Google Scholar
  81. Lewis, W. J., R. L. Jones, and A. N. Sparks. 1972. A host- seeking stimulant for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanescens; its source and a demonstration of its laboratory and field activity. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 1087–9.Google Scholar
  82. Lewis, W. J., R. L. Jones, D. A. Nordland and A. N. Sparks. 1975a. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous in-sects: I. Evaluation for increasing rate of parasitization by Trichogramma spp. in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 1: 343–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lewis, W. J., R. L. Jones, D. A. Nordland and H. R. Gross, Jr. 1975b. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects: II. Mechanisms causing increase in rate of parasitization by Trichogramma spp. J. Chem. Ecol. 1: 349–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lewis, W. J., R. L. Jones, H. R. Gross, Jr., and D. A. Nordland. 1976. The role of kairomones and other behavioral chemicals in host finding by parasitic insects. Behavioral Biology 16: 267–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lewis, W. J., D. A. Nordland, H. R. Gross, Jr., R. L. Jones and S. L. Jones. 1977. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects: V. Moth scales as a stimulus for pred-ators of Heliothis zea (Boddie) eggs by Chrysopa eamea Stephens larvae. J. Chem. Ecol. ( In press ).Google Scholar
  86. Leonard, D. E., B. A. Bierl and M. Beroza. 1975. Gypsy moth kairomones influencing behavior of the parasitoids Brachymeria intermedia and Apanteles melanoscelus. Environ. Entomol. 4: 929–30.Google Scholar
  87. Lingren, P. D. and L. W. Noble. 1971. Preference of Campoletis perdistinctus for certain noctuid larvae. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 104–7.Google Scholar
  88. Lloyd, D. C. 1942. Further experiments on host selection by hymenopterous parasites of the moth, Plutella maculipennis Curtis. Rev. Can. Biol. 1: 633–45.Google Scholar
  89. Madden J. 1968. Behavioral responses of parasites to symbiotic fungus associated with Sirex noctilio F. Nature (London) 218: 189–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Martin, C. H. 1946. Influence of characteristics of the puncture in potatoes on parasitism of potato tuber moth by Macrocen- turs ancylivorus. J. Econ. Entomol. 39: 516–21.Google Scholar
  91. Matthews, R. W. 1974. Biology of Braconidae. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 19: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Miller, M. C. 1972. Scanning electron microscope studies of the flagellar sense receptors of Paridesmia discus and Nasonia vitripennis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 1119–23.Google Scholar
  93. Mitchell, W. C. and R. F. L. Man. 1970. Response of the female southern green stink bug and its parasite Trichopods pennipes to male stink bug pheromones. J. Econ. Entomol. 64: 856–9.Google Scholar
  94. Monteith, L. G. 1955. Host preferences of Drino boherrrtca Mesn. with particular reference to olfactory responses. Can. Entomol. 87: 509–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Monteith, L. G. 1956. Influence of host movement on selection of hosts by Drino bohemioa Mesn. as determined in an olfactometer. Can. Entomol. 88: 583–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Moore, B. P. 1974. Pheromones in the termite societies, pp. 250–6. In Pheromones [M. C. Birch, Ed]. American Elsevier Pub. New York, 495 pp.Google Scholar
  97. Moran, V. C., D. J. Brothers, and J. J. Case. 1969. Observations on the biology of Tetrastiohus flavigaster Brothers and Moran parasitic on psyllid nymphs. Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London 121: 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Mudd, A. and S. A. Corbet. 1973. Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the stored products pests Anagasta kuéhniellaл Ephestia oautella Plodia interpunotella and Ephestia elutella. Entomol. Exp. App. 16: 291–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Muesebeck, C. F. W. and S. M. Dohanian. 1927. A study of hyper-parasitism with particular reference to the parasites of Apanteles melanosoelus (Ratzeburg). U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 1487. 35 pp.Google Scholar
  100. Murphey, R. K. and B. Mendenhall. 1973. Localization of receptors controlling orientation to prey by the back swimmer Notoneota undulata. J. Cотр. Physiol. 84: 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Nettles, W. C. and M. L. Burks. 1975. A substance from Eeliothis vives cens larvae stimulating larviposition by females of the tachinid, Arohytas marmoratus. J. Insect Physiol. 21: 965–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Nordland, D. A. and W. J. Lewis. 1976. Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific inter-actions. J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nordland, D. A., W. J. Lewis, R. L. Jones and H. R. Gross. 1976. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects IV. Effect of kairomones on productivity and longevity of Triohogramma pretioswn Riley. J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Norton, W. N. and S. B. Vinson. 1974. A comparative ultrastructural and behavioral study of the antennal sensory sensilla of the parasitoid, Cardioohiles nigrioeps. J. Morphol. 142: 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Orphanides, G. M. and D. Gonzales. 1970. Effects of adhesive materials and host location on parasitization by uniparental race of Triohogramma pretiosum. J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1891–8.Google Scholar
  106. Payne, T. L. 1974. Pheromone perception, pp. 35–61. In Pheromones [M. C. Birch, Ed]. American Elsevier Pub. N.Y., 495 pp.Google Scholar
  107. Pettey, F. W. 1948. The biological control of prickly pears in South Africa. Union S. Africa.Dept. Agric. Sci. Bull. 271: 163 pp.Google Scholar
  108. Picard, F. 1922. Parasites de Pieris brassicae L. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 56: 54.Google Scholar
  109. Price, P. W. 1972. Behaviour of the parasitoid Pleolphus basi- zonus in response to changes in host and parasitoid density. Can. Entomol. 104: 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Price, P. W. 1975. Insect Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 514 pp.Google Scholar
  111. Pritchard, G. 1965. Prey capture in dragonfly larvae (Odonata: Anisoptera). Can, J. Zool. 43: 271–90.Google Scholar
  112. Quednau, F. W. 1967. Notes on mating behaviour and oviposition of Chryeoaharis Icœicinellae, a parasitoid of the larch casebearer. Can. Entomol. 99: 326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Quednau, F. W. and H. M. Hiibsch. 1964. Factors influencing the host-finding and host acceptance pattern in some Aphytis species. S. Afr. J. Agric. Sci. 7: 543–54.Google Scholar
  114. Quinn, W. G., W. A. Harris and S. Benzer. 1974. Conditioned behavior in DrosopMla melanogaster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 71: 708–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Rajendram, G. F. and K. S. Hagen. 1974. Trichogvamma oviposition into artificial substrates. Environ. Entomol. 3: 399–401.Google Scholar
  116. Read, D. P., P. P. Feeney, and R. B. Root. 1970. Habitat selection by the aphid parasite Diaretiella rapae. Can. Entomol. 102: 1567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Rice, R. E. 1969. Response of some predators and parasites of Ips confusus (LeC.) to olfactory attractants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 23: 189–94.Google Scholar
  118. Richerson, J. V. and C. J. DeLoach. 1972. Some aspects of host selection by Perilitus eoccinellae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 834–9.Google Scholar
  119. Robacker, D. C., C;. M. Weaver and L. B. Hendry. 1976. Sexual communication and associative learning in the parasitic wasp, Itoplectis aonquisitor (Say). J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Roth, J. P. 1976. Host habitat location and larviposition stimu-lation response of the tachinid, Lixophaga diatraeae (Town- send). Dissertation, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS. 68 pp.Google Scholar
  121. Rogers, D. 1972. Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Ryan, R. E. and J. A. Rudinsky. 1962. Biology and habits of the douglas fir beetle parasite, Coeloides brunneri Viereck. Can. Entomol. 94: 748–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Saad, A. A. B. and G. W. Bishop. 1976. Attraction of insects to potato plants through the use of artificial honeydews and aphid juice. Entomophaga. 21: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Salt, G. 1934. Experimental studies in parasitism. II. Super- parasitism. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 114: 455–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Salt, G. 1935. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. III. Host selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 117: 413–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Salt, G. 1937. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. V. The sense used by Trichogramma to distinguish between parasitized and unparasitized hosts. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B. 122: 57–75.Google Scholar
  127. Samson-Boshuizen, M., J. C. van Lenteren, and K. Bakker. 1974. Success of parasitization of Pseudeucolia boohei Weld a matter of experience. Neth. J. Zool. 24: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schmidt, G. T. 1974. Host-acceptance behaviour of Campoletis sono- rensis toward Heliothis zea. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 835–44.Google Scholar
  129. Schneider, F. 1948. Beitrag zer Kenntnis der GenerationsverhSll- nisse und Diapause râuberrscher Schwebefliegen (Syrphidae). Mittell•, Schweiz. Ent. Ges. 21: 249–85.Google Scholar
  130. Schwinch, I. 1955. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Farge Geuichsori- entlerung der Nochtschmetterllnge: Partielle FQhleramputation bei Spinnermânnchen, insbesondere am Slidenspinner Bomblyx mori. L. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 37: 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Shahjahan, M. 1974. Erigeron flowers as food and attractive odor source for Peristenus pseudopallipes, a braconid parasitoid of the tarnished plant bug. Environ. Entomol. 3: 69–72.Google Scholar
  132. Shorey, H. H. 1973. Behavioral responses to insect pheromones. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 18: 349–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Slifer, E. H. 1969. Sense organs on the antennae of a parasitic wasp, Nasonia vitripennis. Biol. Bull. 136: 253–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Slobodchikoff, C. N. 1973. Behavioral studies of three morphotypes of Therion oiroimfleosum. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 49: 197–206.Google Scholar
  135. Soper, R. S., G. E. Shewell and D. Tyrrell. 1976. Colcondamyia auditrix New Sp. Diptera:Saracophagidae), a parasite which is attracted by the mating song of its host, Okanagana rimosa (Homoptera: Cicadidae) Can. Ent. 108: 61–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Southwood, T. R. E. 1966. Ecological Methods. Methuen and Co. London. 391 pp.Google Scholar
  137. Spradberry, J. P. 1968. A technique for artificially culturing ichneumonid parasites of wood wasps. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 11: 257–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Spradberry, J. P. 1970. The biology of Ibalia drewseni Borries a parasite of siricid woodwasps. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London Ser. C 45: 104–13.Google Scholar
  139. Stary, P. 1966. Aphid parasites of Czechoslovakia. A review of the Czechoslovak Aphidiidae (Hymenoptera). The Hague: Junk. 242 pp.Google Scholar
  140. Sternlicht, M. 1973. Parasitic wasps attracted by the sex pheromone of the coccid host. Entomophaga 18: 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sundby, R. A. 1967. Influence of food on fecundity of Chrysopa cornea Stephens. Entomophaga 12: 475–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Sweetman, H. L. 1958. The Principles of Biological Control. Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa. 560 pp.Google Scholar
  143. Taylor, J. S. 1932. Report on cotton insects and disease investigations. Pt. II. Notes on the American bollworm (Heliothis obsoleta F.) on cotton and on its parasites (Microbracon bre- vieornis Wesm). Sci. Bull. Dept. Agric. For. Un. S. Afr. No. 113. 18 pp.Google Scholar
  144. Tawfik, M. F. S. 1957. Host parasite specificity in a braconid Apanteles glomeratus L. Nature 179: 1031–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Tetle, J. P. 1974. Pheromones in insect population management, pp. 399–410. In Pheromones [M. C. Birch, Ed.]. American Elsevier Pub. New York. 495 pp.Google Scholar
  146. Thorpe, W. H. and F. G. W. Jones. 1937. Olfactory conditioning in a parasite insect and its relation to the problem of host selection. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London Ser. B. 124: 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Thompson, W. R. 1951. The specificity of host relations in pre- daceous insects. Can. Ent. 83: 262–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Tillyard, R. J. 1930. The biological control of noxious weeds. Trans. 4th Internatl. Congr. Ent. 2: 4–9 (1928).Google Scholar
  149. Traynier, R. M. M. 1968. Sex attraction in the Mediterranean flower moth, Anagasta kuehniellai location of the female by the male. Can. Entomol. 100: 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Tumlinson, J. H. and R. R. Heath. 1976. Structure elucidation of insect pheromones by microanalytical methods. J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Ullyett, G. C. 1947. Mortality factors in populations of Plutella maoulipennis Curtis (Lepidoptera: Tineidae), and their relation to the problems of control. Union S. Africa, Dept. Agric. Ent. Mem. 2: 77–202.Google Scholar
  152. Vinson, S. B. 1968. Source of a substance in Eeliothis viresoens that elicits a searching response in its habitual parasite, Ccœdioohiles nigrioeps. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 61: 8–10.Google Scholar
  153. Vinson, S. B. 1972. Competition and host discrimination between two species of tobacco budworm parasitoids. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 229–36.Google Scholar
  154. Vinson, S. B. 1975a. Biochemical coevolution between parasitoids and their hosts, pp. 14–48. In Evolutionary Strategies of Parasitic Insects and Mites. [P. W. Price, Ed]. Plenum: New York. 225 pp.Google Scholar
  155. Vinson, S. B. 1975b. Source of material in the tobacco budworm involved in host recognition by the egg-larval parasitoid, Chelonus texanus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68: 381–4.Google Scholar
  156. Vinson, S. B. 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 21: 109–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Vinson, S. B. and W. J. Lewis. 1965. A method of host selection by Ccœdioohiles nigrioeps. J. Econ. Entomol. 58: 869–71.Google Scholar
  158. Vinson, S. B. and F. S. Guillot. 1972. Host-marking: source of a substance that results in host discrimination in insect parasitoids. Entomophaga 17: 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Vinson, S. C., F. S. Guillot and D. B. Hays. 1973. Rearing of Ccœdioohiles nigrioeps in the laboratory with Heliothis vi- resoens as hosts. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66: 1170–72.Google Scholar
  160. Vinson, S. C., R. L. Jones, P. Sonnet, B. A. Beirl, and M. Beroza. 1975. Isolation, identification and synthesis of host-seeking stimulants for Ccœdioohiles nigrioeps, a parasitoid of the tobacco budworm. Entomol. Exp. App. 18: 443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Vinson, S. C., R. D. Henson and C. S. Barfield. 1976. Ovipositional behavior of Braoon mellitor Say (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis Boh.) I. Isolation and identification of a synthetic releaser of ovipositor probing. J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 431–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Vinson, S. C., C. S. Barfield and R. D. Henson. 1977. Oviposition behavior of Braoon mellitory a parasitoid of the boll weevil CAnthonomus grandis) I I. Associative learning. Physiological Entomology (In Press).Google Scholar
  163. Vité, J. P. and D. L. Williamson. 1970. Thanasimus dubius: Prey preception. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 233–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Walker, M. F. 1961. Some observations on the biology of the ladybird parasite, Perilitus oocoinellae (Schrank) with special reference to host selection and recognition. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 97: 240–4.Google Scholar
  165. Went, D. F. and G. Krause. 1973. Normal development of mechani-cally activated, unlaid eggs of an endoparasitic hymenoptern. Nature 244: 454–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Weseloh, R. M. 1970. Influence of host deprivation and physical host characteristics on host selection behavior of the hyper- parasitic Cheilonevœus noxius. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 580–6.Google Scholar
  167. Weseloh, R. M. 1974. Host recognition by the gypsy moth larval parasitoid, Apanteles melanosoelus. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 585–7.Google Scholar
  168. Weseloh, R. M. 1977. Behavioral responses of the parasite, Apanteles melanoseelus л to Gypsy moth silk. Environmental Entomol. 5: 1128–32.Google Scholar
  169. Weseloh, R. M. and B. R. Bartlett. 1971. Influence of chemical characteristics of the secondary scale host on host selection behavior of the hyperparasite Cheiloneupus noxius. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 1259–64.Google Scholar
  170. Williams, J. R. 1951. The factors which promote and influence the oviposition of Nemeritis eanesoens Gravs. Proc. Roy. Entomol. Soc. London Ser. A 26: 49–58.Google Scholar
  171. Wilbert, H. 1974. Die Wahrnehmung von Beute durch die Eilarven von Aphidoletes apMdimyza (Cedidomyiidae). Entomophaga 19: 173–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Wilson, D. D., R. L. Ridgway, and S. B. Vinson. 1974. Host acceptance and oviposition behavior of the parasitoid Campoletis sonovensis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 271–4.Google Scholar
  173. Wood, D. L., L. E. Brown, W. D. Bedard, P. E. Tilden, R. M. Silver- stein and J. 0. Rodin. 1968. Response of Ips eonfusus to synthetic sex pheromones in nature. Science 59: 1373–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Wright, R. H. 1964. Metarchon: A new term for a class of non–toxic pest control agents. Nature (London) 204: 603–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Wright, R. H. 1965. Finding metarchons for pest control. Nature (London) 207: 103–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Wylie, H. G. 1965. Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized house fly pupae by females of Nasonia vitri- pennis Walk. Can. Entomol. 97: 279–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Young, J. C. and R. M. Silverstein. 1976. Biological and chemical methodology in the study of insect communication, pp. 75–161. In Methods in Olfactory Research. [Moulton, D. G., A. Turk and J. W. Johnston, Jr., Ed]. Academic Press, N. Y. pp. 497.Google Scholar
  178. Zwölfer, H. and M. Kraus. 1957. Biocoenotic studies on the parasites of two fir and two oak-tortricids. Entomophaga 2: 173–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Bradleigh Vinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations