Advertisement

Holography by Shadow Casting

  • H. J. Caulfield
Part of the Nato Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 10)

Abstract

”Coded aperture imaging” is a recently agreed-upon name (1) for a two-step imaging process conceived in the early 1960’s by Mertz and Young (2, 3, 4, 5) at Block Engineering. Their basic idea was to let each point in the object encode its three-dimensional location by casting a shadow of a Fresnel zone plate onto a photographic plate. Thus an object consisting of a collection of points would be encoded as a collection of zone plates. Lateral displacement of the object points leads to lateral displacement of the shadow-cast zone plates. Vertical displacement of the object points leads to scale changes in the shadow-cast zone plates. Given this encoded image, it is easy to arrive at an image. Illumination with coherent light converts each zone plate into a point. The lateral position of the decoded point is determined by the lateral position of the corresponding zone plate. The vertical position of each decoded point is determined by the scale of the corresponding zone plate. Thus the three - dimensional image encoded by shadow casting can be decoded by illumination with coherent light.

Keywords

Spatial Frequency Image Encode Central Disc Object Point Fresnel Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    The text of the agreements reached by most American workers in coded aperture imaging will be published soon in Applied Optics. Preprints are also available from the author.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    L. Mertz. J. Opt. Soc. Am., advertisements, Feb (1960) and May (1961).Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    L. Mertz, Transformations in Optics (John Wiley, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    N. O. Young, Sky and Telescope 25, 8 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    L. Mertz and N. O. Young in Proc. Inf’l. Conf. on Optical Instruments, (Chapman and Hall, London, 1961).Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    H. H. Barrett, D. T. Wilson and G. D. DeMeester, Optics Comm. 5, 398 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    H. H. Barrett, K. Garewal, and D. T. Wilson, Radiology 104, 429 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    H. H. Barrett, D. T. Wilson, and G. D, DeMeester, Opt. Eng. 12, 7 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    H. H. Barrett and F. A. Horrigan, Appl. Opt. 12, (1973).Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    H. J. Caulfield and A. D. Williams, Opt. Eng. 12, 3 (1973).Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    M. D. Tipton, J. E. Dowdey, and H. J. Caulfield, Opt. Eng. 12, (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. J. Caulfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Block Engineering, Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations