Superconducting DC Machines

  • A. D. Appleton
Part of the Nato Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSB, volume 1)


A rotating electrical machine may be manufactured in a few minutes using some copper wire, a battery and a few odds and ends. However, when the power required from a machine is increased, more sophisticated methods are necessary and ultimately the available technology is pushed to its limits. For large direct current motors and generators, the subject of this paper, the limit of power using the conventional design approach is around 10 MW or so and, of course, the use of iron magnetic circuits is essential (we shall see later how essential is the iron if normal temperature materials are employed). The magnetic flux density in the iron may be between land2Tesla depending upon the selected machine geometry, and certainly flux densities much below this level are not much use for rotating electrical machines. It is for this reason that the early superconductors (type 1 superconductors) were of only academic interest to machine designers; the best of them is niobium with a practical working level of less than 0.2 Tesla. It is this fact which explains the absence of superconducting machine development from that historic day in 1911 when superconductivity was discovered to the mid 1960’s when the first machine (in the power range) was manufactured. Superconducting machines became possible with the development of type 2 superconductors, initially with niobium-zirconium, now with niobium-titanium and perhaps in the future niobium-tin. The potential of superconductors to electrical engineers is graphically illustrated in Fig. 1 which compares the current carrying capacities of copper and niobium-titanium.


Model Motor Super Conducting Current Collection Torque Reaction Armature Current 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Appleton, A.D. and MacNab, R.B., Commission 1, London, Annex, 1969, 1 Bull. I.I.R. 261.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Appleton, A.D. and Ross, J.S.H., Commission 1, London, Annex, 1969, 1 Bull. I.I.R. 269.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tinlin, F. and Ross, J.S.H., Commission 1. London, Annex, 1969, 1 Bull. I.I.R. 277.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Appleton, A.D., Commission 1, London, Annex 1969, 1 Bull.I.I.R. 207.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamamoto, M., Commission 1, London, Annex 1969, 1 Bull. I.I.R. 285.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clayton, A.E., The Performance and Design of Direct Current Machines, Pitman (1959).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Greenwood, L., Design of Direct Current Machines, MacDonald (1949).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Appleton, A.D., Shipbuilding and Shipping Record, 122, August 17 (1973).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Appleton, A, D, and MacNab, R.B., Proc. Third International Cryogenic Engineering Conference, Berlin, May 1970.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Appleton, A.D., Science Journal, 5, No. 4, 41 (1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacNab, I.R. and Wilkin, G.A., IEE Journal, Electronics and Power, 18, 8 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shobert, G.I., Carbon Brushes, Chemical Publishing Co., New York (1965).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baker, R. M. and Hewitt, C.W., Electrical Engineering, (1937).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pattison, R.I.D., Clark, E. and Berger, B., Electrical Times (1965).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Appleton, A.D., in Proc, of 1972 App. Supercond. Conf., Annapolis, Md., IEEE Pub. 72CH0682–5-TABSC (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Appleton
    • 1
  1. 1.International Research and Development Co. Ltd.Newcastle Upon TyneEngland

Personalised recommendations