Models of Interaction between Higher Plants and Bacteria

  • Klaus Rudolph
Part of the NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series book series (NSSA, volume 10)


Three models of interaction between higher plants and bacteria have been distinguished, compatibility, incompatibility and plants infected by saprophytic bacteria (25).


Hypersensitive Reaction Bacterial Blight Bacterial Wilt Fire Blight Bean Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    CAROLL, R.B., LUKEZIC, F.L. and LEVINE, R.G. (1972). Absence of a common antigen relationship between Corynebacterium insidiosum and Medicago sativa as a factor in disease development. Phytopathology, 62, 1351–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CHAKRAVARTI, B.P., LEBEN, C. and DAFT, G.C. (1972). Numbers and antagonistic properties of bacteria from buds of field-grown soybean plants. Can. J. Microbiol., 18, 696–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    CHATTERJEE, A.K., GIBBINS, L.N. and CARPENTER, J.A. (1969). Some observations on the physiology of Erwinia herbicola and its possible implications as a factor antagonistic to Erwinia amylovora in the “fire-blight” syndrome. Can. J. Microbiol., 15, 640–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CHO, Y.S., WILCOXSON, R.D. and FROSHEISER, F.I. (1973). Differences in anatomy, plant-extracts, and movement of bacteria in plants of bacterial wilt resistant and susceptible varieties of alfalfa. Phytopathology, 63, 760–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    COOK, A.A. and STALL, R.E. (1967). The effect of Xanthomonas vesicatoria on permeability in resistant and susceptible pepper leaves. Phytopathology, 57, 807.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CROSSE, J.E. (1966). Epidemiological relations of the Pseudomonas pathogens of deciduous fruit trees. A. Rev. Phytopath.; 4, 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DELGADO, M.A. (1974). Zur Pathogenese und Epidemiologie der durch Pseudomonas syringae van Hall verursachten Braunfleckenkrankheit der Buschbohne (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Dissertation. Gottingen.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    DIXON, R.O.D. (1969). Rhizobia, with particular reference to relationship with host plants. A. Rev. Microbiol., 23, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DOWLER, W.M. and WEAVER, D.J. (1975). Isolation and characterization of fluorescent pseudomonads from apparently healthy peach trees. Phytopathology, 65, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ERCOLANI, G.L. (1970). Bacterial canker of tomato. III. The effect of auxotrophic mutation on the virulence of Cory-nebacterium rrrichiganense (E.F. Sm.) Jens. Phytopath. medit., 9, 145–150.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ERCOLANI, G.L. (1973). Two hypotheses on the aetiology of response of plants to phytopathogenic bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol., 75, 83–95.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ERIKSON, D. (1945). Certain aspects of resistance of plum trees to bacterial canker. Part II. On the nature of bacterial invasion of Prunus spp. by Pseudomonas mors-prunorum Wormald. Ann. app. Biol., 32, 112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ÉRSEK, T., BARNA, B. and KIRáLY, Z. (1973). Hypersensitivity and the resistance of potato tuber tissues to Phytophthora infestans. Acta phytopath. Acad. Sci. hung., 8, 3–12.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    FOX, R.T.V., MANNERS, J.G. and MYERS, A. (1972). Ultrastructure of tissue disintegration and host reactions in potato tubers by Erwinia carotovora var. atroseptica. Potato Res., 15, 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    GOODMAN, R.N., HUANG, S. and HUANG, P. Y. (1974). A host specific phytotoxic polysaccharide from apple tissue infected by Erwinia amylovora. Science, N.Y., 183, 1081–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    GROGAN, R.G., LUCAS, L.T. and KIMBLE, K.A. (1965). The correlation of pathogenicity in Pseudomonas lachrymans and P. phaseolicola with specific capsular antigens. Phytopathology, 55, 1060.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    HAYWARD, A.C. (1974). Latent infections by bacteria. A. Rev. Phytopath., 12, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    HILDEBRand, D.C. (1973). Tolerance of homoserine by Pseudomonas pisi and implications of homoserine in plant resistance. Phytopathology, 63, 301–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    HOPPER, D.G., VENERE, R.J., BRINKERHOFF, L.A. and GHOLSON, R.K. (1975). Necrosis induction in cotton. Phytopathology, 65, 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    HSU, S.T. and DICKEY, R.S. (1972). Interaction between Xanthomonas phaseoli, Xanthomonas vesicatoria, Xanthomonas campes tris and Pseudomonas fluoresoens in bean and tomato leaves. Phytopathology, 62, 1120–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    HUANG, J.S., HUANG, P.Y. and GOODMAN, R.N. (1974). Ultrastructural changes in tobacco thylakoid membrane protein caused by a bacterially induced hypersensitive reaction. Physiol. Pl. Path., 4, 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    KEEN, N.T. and KENNEDY, B.W. (1974). Hydroxyphaseollin and related isoflavanoids in the hypersensitive resistance reaction of soybeans to Pseudomonas glycinea. Physiol. Pl. Path., 4, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    KELMAN, A. and SEQUEIRA, L. (1972). Resistance in plants to bacteria. Proc. R. Soc. B, 181, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    KENNEDY, R.W., MEW, T.W. and OLSON, L. (1971). Reaction of soybean tissue culture to pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria. Proc. 3rd int. Conf. Pl. pathogenic Bacteria, Wageningen, 201–202.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    KLEMENT, Z. (1971). Development of the hypersensitivity reaction induced by plant pathogenic bacteria. Proc. 3rd int. Conf. Pl. pathogenic Bacteria, Wageningen, 157–164.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    KLEMENT, Z. and GOODMAN, R.N. (1967). The hypersensitive reaction to infection by bacterial plant pathogens. A. Rev. Phytopath., 5, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LANGE, R.T. (1966). Bacterial symbiosis with plants. In: Symbiosis. (Henry, S.M., Ed.), Vol. I, 99–170. Academic Press, New York, London.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    LEBEN, C. and MILLER, T.D. (1973). A pathogenic pseudomonad from healthy field-grown soybean plants. Phytopathology, 63, 1464–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MAINO, A.L., SCHROTH, M.N. and VITANZA, V.B. (1974). Synergy between Achromobacter sp. and Pseudomonas phaseolicola resulting in increased disease. Phytopathology, 64, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    MCINTYRE, J.L., KUć, J. and WILLIAMS, E.B. (1973). Protection of pear against fire blight by bacteria and bacterial sonicates. Phytopathology, 63, 872–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    NICKELL, L.G. (1959). Antimicrobial activity of vascular plants. Econ. Bot., 13, 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    NOVACKY, A. (1972). Suppression of the bacterially induced hypersensitive reaction by cytokinins. Physiol. Pl. Path., 2, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    PATIL, S.S., HAYWARD, A.C. and EMMONS, R. (1974). An ultraviolet-induced nontoxigenic mutant of Pseudomonas phaseolicola of altered pathogenicity. Phytopathology, 64, 590–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    PURUSHOTHAMAN, D. and PRASAD, N.N. (1971). Multiplication of bacterial leaf blight pathogen in leaf extracts of three rice cultivars. Annamalai Univ. agric. Res. Annu., 3, 90–92.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    RAMA, R., URS, N.V. and DUNLEAVY, J.M. (1974). Bactericidal activity of horseradish peroxidase on Xanthomonas pha-seoli var.sojensis. Phytopathology, 64, 542–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    REDDY, A.P.K. and KAUFFMAN, H.E. (1973). Multiplication and movement of Xanthomonas ovyzae in susceptible and resistant hosts. Pl. Bis. Reptr., 57, 784–787.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    RUDOLPH, K. (1969). Ein phytotoxisches Polysaccharid von Pseudomonas phaseolicola. Naturwissenschaften, 56, 569–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    RUDOLPH, K. (1972). The halo-blight toxin of Pseudomonas phaseolicola: Influence on host parasite relationships and counter effect of metabolites. In: Phytotoxins in plant diseases. (Wood, R.K.S., Ballio, A. and Graniti, A., Eds.), 373–375. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    RUDOLPH, K. and CINAR, O. (1971). Bacteriostatic compounds from bean leaves. Acta phytopath. Acad. Sci. hung., 6, 105–113.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    RUDOLPH, K. and STAHMANN, M.A. (1964). Interactions of peroxidases and catalases between Phaseolus vulgaris and Pseudomonas phaseolicola (halo blight of bean). Nature, Lond., 204, 474–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    SASSER, M. (1974). Evidence against the involvement of hydrogen peroxidase in bacterial leaf spot of pepper. Phytopathology, 64, 793–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    SCHROTH, M.N. and HILDEBRand, D.C. (1967). Host reaction as a method of differentiating bacterial plant pathogens. Proc. 2nd int. Conf. Pl. pathogenic Bacterial Lisbon. Contr. no. 23.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    SHAW, M. and SAMBORSKI, D.J. (1956). The physiology of the host-parasite relations. I. The accumulation of radioactive substances at infections of facultative and obligate parasites including tobacco mosaic virus. Can. J. Bot., 34, 389–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    SINCLAIR, M.G., SASSER, J.M. and GULYA, T.J. (1970). Pepper leaf intercellular fluid composition after inoculation with Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology, 60, 1314.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    SöDING, H. (1959). Über das Verhalten von Bakterien in lebenden Blättern. Arch. Mikrobiol., 34, 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    STALL, R.E., BARTZ, J.A. and COOK, A.A. (1974). Decreased hypersensitivity to xanthomonads in pepper after inoculations with virulent cells of Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology, 64, 731–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    STROBEL, G.A. (1974). Phytotoxins produced by plant parasites. A. Rev. Pl. Physiol., 25, 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    SüLE, S., COLENO, A. and LE NORMand, M. (1973). Inhibition de la réaction hypersensible par des extraits de feuilles. Acta phytopath. Acad. Sci. hung., 8, 71–75.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    THOMPSON, S.V., SCHROTH, M.N., MOLLER, W.J. and REIL, W.O. (1975). Occurrence of fire blight of pears in relation to weather and epiphytic populations of Erwinia amylovora. Phytopathology, 65, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    TSCHESCHE, R. and WULFF, G. (1965). Über die antimikrobielle Wirksamkeit von Saponinen. Z. Naturf., 206, 543–546.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    TURNER, J.G. and NOVACKY, A. (1974). The quantitative relation between plant and bacterial cells involved in the hypersensitive reaction. Phytopathology, 64, 885–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    WAINWRIGHT, S.H. and NELSON, P.E. (1972). Histopathology of Pelargonium species infected with Xanthomonas pelargonii. Phytopathology, 62, 1337–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    YOUNG, J.M. (1974). Development of bacterial populations in vivo in relation to plant pathogenicity. N.Z. Jl. agric. Res., 17, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    YOUNG, J.M. (1974a). Effect of water on bacterial multiplication in plant tissue. N.Z. Jl. agric. Res., 17, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    ZALEWSKI, J.C. and SEQUEIRA, L. (1973). Inhibition of bacterial growth by extracts from potato tissues. Phytopathology, 63, 942–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    ZELLER, W. (1972). Zur Wirkung des Toxins von Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burkh.) Dowson im Hinblick auf Permeabilitätsveränderungen. Dissertation, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    ZELLER, W. and RUDOLPH, K. (1972). Einfluss des Toxins von Pseudomonas phaseolicola auf die Permeabilität und den osmotischen Wert von Mangoldblättern(Beta vulgaris L.). Z. Pflanzenphysiol., 67, 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    ZELLER, W., RUDOLPH, K. and FUCHS, W.H. (1973). Permeabilitätsveränderungen bei resistenten und anfälligen Buschbohnensorten nach Inokulation mit Pseudomonas phaseolicola (Burkh.) Dowson. Phytopath. Z., 11, 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Rudolph
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Pflanzenpathologie und Pflanzenschutz der UniversitätGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations