Advertisement

Marine Geotechnical Properties: Interrelationships and Relationships to Depth of Burial

  • George H. Keller
Part of the Marine Science book series (MR, volume 2)

Abstract

Marine Geotechnique is a relatively new field which attempts to define and understand the mass physical and chemical properties of sea-floor deposits and the reponse of these materials to applied static and dynamic forces. Although only a relatively small portion of the ocean floor has yet been studied, it appears that it is feasible at this stage of our knowledge to define certain interrelationships among a number of the physical, electrical, and acoustical properties of these deposits. Most prominent of these correlations are unit weight (density) with water content, porosity with resistivity, mean grain size with porosity and density, sound velocity with unit weight and porosity, and reflectivity with porosity and unit weight. In some cases where a relatively large number of analyses have been made it has been possible to formulate predicting equations for such properties as unit weight, water content, void ratio, and shear strength. At best, most of the correlations provide only an approximation and are restricted to the sediment type or local area from which the basis for the correlation was developed.

Keywords

Shear Strength Specific Gravity Marine Sediment Sound Velocity Void Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, R. H., G. H. Keller, and R. F. Busby, Mass property variability in three closely spaced deep-sea sediment cores, J. Sediment. Petrol., 40, 1038–1043, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, R. H., D. N. Lambert, and P. J. Grim, Tables for determining unit weight of deep-sea sediments from water content and average grain density measurements, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tech. Memo, ERL AOML-13, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Bjerrum, L., Fundamental considerations on the shear strength of soil, Géotechnique, 2, 209–218, 1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjerrum, L., Theoretical and experimental investigations on the shear strength of soils, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Publ. 5, 1954.Google Scholar
  5. Bouma, A. H., W. E. Sweet, Jr., W. A. Dunlap, and W. R. Bryant, Comparison of geological and engineering parameters of marine sediments, 4th Ann. Offshore Tech. Conf. Preprints, 1, 21–34, 1972.Google Scholar
  6. Boyce, R. E., Electrical resistivity of modern marine sediments from the Bering Sea, U. S. Naval Undersea Warfare Center Tech. Publ. 6, 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant, W. R., and P. K. Trabant, Statistical relationships between geotechnical properties of Gulf of Mexico sediments, 4th Ann. Offshore Tech. Conf. Preprints, II, 363–368, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Buchan, S., D. M. McCann, and D. T. Smith, Relations between the acoustic and geotechnical properties of marine sediments, Quart. J. Eng. Geol., 5, 265–284, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cernock, P. J., Sound velocities in Gulf of Mexico sediments as related to physical properties and simulated overburden pressures, Texas A&M University Tech. Rept. 70-5-T, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. Chmelik, F. B., A. H. Bouma, and R. Rezak, Comparison of electrical logs and physical parameters of marine sediment cores, Trans. Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc, 19, 63–70, 1969.Google Scholar
  11. Creager, S. S., D. W. Scholl, et al., Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, 19, 913, U. S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1973.Google Scholar
  12. Faas, R. W., An empirical relationship between reflection coefficients and ocean bottom sediments, in Symp. Ocean Sci. and Eng. of the Atlantic Shelf, pp. 149-167, Phila., 1968.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, E. L., Low sound velocities in high porosity sediments, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 28, 16–19, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, E. L., Consolidation characteristics and related properties of sediments for experimental Mohole (Guadalupe Site), J. Geophys. Res., 69, 4257–4269, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, E. L., Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments, North Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 75, 4423–4446, 1970a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton, E. L., Reflection coefficients and bottom losses at normal incidence computed from Pacific sediment properties, Geophysics, 35., 995–1004, 1970b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton, E. L., Compressional wave attenuation in marine sediments, Geophysics, 37, 620–646, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamilton, E. L., G. Shumway, W. H. Menard, and C. J. Shipek, Acoustic and other physical properties of shallow-water sediments off San Diego, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 28, 1–15, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hatcher, P., Diagenesis of Organic Matter in the Sediments of Mangrove Lake, Bermuda, Masters thesis, Univ. of Miami (in preparation), 1974.Google Scholar
  20. Holmes, C. W., and H. G. Goodell, The prediction of strength in the sediments of St. Andrew Bay, Florida, J. Sediment. Petrol., 34, 134–143, 1964.Google Scholar
  21. Horn, D. R., B. M. Horn, and M. N. Delach, Correlation between acoustical and other physical properties of deep-sea cores, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 1939–1957, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Inderbitzen, A. L., Relationship between sedimentation rate and shear strength in recent marine sediments off Southern California, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univ., 1969.Google Scholar
  23. Keller, G. H., Shear strength and other physical properties of sediments from some ocean basins, in Civil Engineering in the Oceans, pp. 391–417, Am. Soc. Civil Engrs., N. Y., 1968a.Google Scholar
  24. Keller, G. H. and R. H. Bennett, Mass physical properties of submarine sediments in the Atlantic and Pacific basins, in Proc. 23rd Intern. Geol. Cong., 8, 33–50, Prague, 1968b.Google Scholar
  25. Keller, G. H. and D. N. Lambert, Geotechnical properties of submarine sediments, Mediterranean Sea (abstract) in Proc. VIII Intern. Sediment. Cong., Heidelberg, 1971.Google Scholar
  26. Kermabon, A., C. Gehin, and P. Blavier, A deep-sea electrical resistivity probe for measuring porosity and density of unconsolidated sediments, Geophysics, 34, 554–571, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambert, D. N., and R. H. Bennett, Tables for determining porosity of deep-sea sediments from water content and average grain density measurements, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Tech. Memo. ERL AOML-17, 1972.Google Scholar
  28. Loring, D. H., Bottom analysis of sediments of the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the Atlantic Continental Shelf from Newfoundland to Georges Bank in respect to acoustical reflection, Fisheries Res. Board of Canada Manuscript Rept. Series, 127, 1962.Google Scholar
  29. McClelland, B., Progress of consolidation in delta front and prodelta clays of the Mississippi River, in Marine Geotechnique, edited by A. F. Richards, pp. 22–40, Univ. of Ill. Press, Urbana, 1967.Google Scholar
  30. Moore, D. G., Submarine slumps, J. Sediment. Petrol., 31, 343–357, 1961.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, D. G., Shear strength and related properties of sediments from experimental Mohole (Guadalupe site), J. Geophys. Res., 69, 4271–4291, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moore, D. G., and G. Shumway, Sediment thickness and physical properties: Pigeon Point Shelf, California, J. Geophys. Res., 64, 367–374, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nacci, V., L. Lewis, J. Gallagher, and M. Huston, Correlation of geotechnical and acoustical properties of ocean sediments, in Proc. Intern. Symp. on the Eng. Properties of Sea Floor Soils and their Geophys. Ident., pp. 268–278, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, 1971.Google Scholar
  34. Nafe, J. E., and C. L. Drake, Variation with depth in shallow and deep water marine sediments of porosity, density and the velocities of compressional and shear waves, Geophysics, 22, 523–552, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richards, A. F., Investigations of deep-sea sediment cores, I. Shear strength, bearing capacity, and consolidation, U. S. Navy Hydrographic Office Tech. Rept. 63, 1961.Google Scholar
  36. Richards, A. F., Investigation of deep-sea sediment cores, II. Mass physical properties, U. S. Navy Hydrographic Office Tech. Rept. 106, 1962.Google Scholar
  37. Richards, A. F., Preface, in Marine Geotechnique, edited by A. F. Richards, Univ. of Ill. Press, Urbana, 1967.Google Scholar
  38. Rutledge, P. C., Review of the cooperative triaxial research program of the War Department, Corps of Engineers, covering the period February 1940 to May 1944, in Soil mechanics fact finding survey, progress report: triaxial shear research and pressure distribution studies on soils, pp. 1-178, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, 1947.Google Scholar
  39. Shumway, G., Sound-speed and absorption studies of marine sediments by a resonance method — Part II, Geophysics, 25, 659–682, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skempton, A. W., Soil mechanics in relation to geology, Proc. Yorkshire Geol. Soc, 29, 33–62, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, D. T., Acoustic and electrical techniques for sea-floor sediment identification, in Proc. Intern. Symp. on the Eng. Properties of Sea Floor Soils and their Geophys. Ident., pp. 235-267, Seattle, 1971.Google Scholar
  42. Sweet, W. E., Jr., Electrical resistivity logging in unconsolidated sediments, Texas A&M University Sea Grant Rept. 72-205, 1972.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • George H. Keller
    • 1
  1. 1.Atlantic Oceanographic & Meteorological LaboratoriesUSA

Personalised recommendations