Advertisement

Smooth Muscle pp 165-183 | Cite as

Recording Electrical and Mechanical Activities of Smooth Muscle

  • S. K. Sarna

Abstract

Electrical and mechanical activities of smooth muscle (Bass and Callantine, 1964; Carlson et al., 1970; Daniel and Chapman, 1963; Daniel and Irwin, 1968; Daniel et al., 1960; Doming and Reinbe, 1968; Prosser and Bortoff, 1968; Weisbrodt et al., 1970) are two of its characteristics that have been widely studied to explain the processes underlying smooth muscle function. Methods of recording these activities using intracellular and extracellular electrodes and strain gauges are described in other chapters. This chapter is intended to give an introduction to the electronic components used and the principles involved in the recording of electrical and mechanical activities of smooth muscle. A brief introduction to the applications of operational amplifiers is also given.

Keywords

Cutoff Frequency Strain Gauge Pulse Train Input Impedance Operational Amplifier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bass, P. and Callantine, M. R. 1964. Simultaneous recording of electrical and mechanical activities of the uterus in the unanesthetized animal. Nature., 203: 1367–1368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, P. and Wiley, Q. N. 1972. Contractile force transducer for recording muscle activity in anesthetized animals. J. Appl Physiol, 32:567–570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boncek, R. J., Murphy, W. P., and Paff, G. H. 1959. Electrical and mechanical properties of chick embryo heart chambers. Circ. Res., 7:787–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlson, G. M., Ruddon, R. W., Hug, Jr., C. C., Schmiege, S. K. and Bass, P. 1970. Analysis of the site of nicotine action on gastric antral and duodenal contractile activity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 172:377–383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel, E. E. and Chapman, K. M. 1963. Electrical activity of the gastrointestinal tract as an indication of mechanical activity. Am. J. Dig. Dis., 8:54–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniel, E. E. and Irwin, J. 1968. Electrical activity of gastric musculature. In: Handbook of Physiology. Alimentary Canal, Section 6, Vol. IV, pp. 1969–1984. American Physiol Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Daniel, E. E., Wächter, B. T., Honour, A. J., and Bogoch, A. 1960. The relationship between electrical and mechanical activity of the small intestine of dog and man. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol., 38: 777–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doebelin, E. O. 1966. Measurement Systems, Application and Design. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Doming, J. A. and Reinbe, D. A. 1968. Extraluminal force transducer for in vivo measurement of rabbit uterine contractile activity. Fertility Sterility, 19:945–953.Google Scholar
  10. Erdos, E. G., Jackman, V., and Barnes, W. C. 1962. Instrument for recording isotonic contractions of smooth muscles. J. Appl Physiol., 17:367–368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fein, H. 1964. Solid state electrometers with input capacitance centralization. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med Eng., BME-11:13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foldvari, T. and Lion, K. 1964. Capacitive transducers. Instr. Control Systems, 37:77–85.Google Scholar
  13. Geddes, L. A. and Baker, L. E. 1968. Principles of Applied Biomedical Instrumentation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Geddes, L. A., Hoff, H. E., and Spencer, W. A. 1957. The physiograph—an instrument in teaching physiology. J. Med. Educ., 32:181–198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Geddes, L. A., Baker, L. E., and McGoodwin, M. 1967. The relationship between electrode area and amplifier input impedance in recording muscle action potentials. Med. Biol. Eng., 5:561–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graine, J. G., Tobey, G. E., and Huelsman, N. P. 1971. Operational Amplifiers: Design and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Heath, J. H. 1958. The differential transformer as a sensitive measuring device. Electron. Eng., 30: 631–633.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, J. M., Connell, A. M., Kennedy, T. L., and Clarke, E. W. 1972. Application of miniaturized mercury column strain gauges to the study of gastric motility. Am. J. Dig. Dis., 17:455–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, J. W. and Cole, K. S. 1963. Voltage clamp techniques. In: Physical Techniques in Biological Research. Vol. VI, Part B, Electrophysiological Methods. Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Prosser, C. L. and Bortoff, A. 1968. Electrical activity of intestinal muscle in vitro conditions. In: Handbook of Physiology. Alimentary Canal, Section 6, Vol. IV, pp. 2025–2050. American Physiological Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  21. Shaevitz, H. 1947. The linear variable differential transformer. Proc. Soc. Stress Anal., 78–88.Google Scholar
  22. Weisbrodt, N. W., Hug, Jr., C. C., Schmiege, S. K. and Bass, P. 1970. Effect of nicotine and tyramine on contractile activity of the colon. Eur. J. Pharmacol, 12:310–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yanof, H. M. 1965. Biomedical Electronics. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Sarna
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Surgery and Electrical EngineeringMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations