Nerve—Muscle Preparations of Genito-Urinary Muscle (Other Than Vas Deferens)
Nerve—muscle preparations of other smooth muscles in the genito-urinary tract have been studied less extensively than those of the vas deferens. One reason is that, unlike the vas deferens, these other muscles usually show considerable spontaneous, myogenic activity. It is assumed that neural influences modulate rather than initiate this activity so that the effects of nerve stimulation are more subtle and therefore more difficult to analyze than in the vas deferens. Another reason is that the innervation density, determined histochemically and biochemically (Labay et al., 1970; Marshall, 1970), is considerably less in genito-urinary muscles other than the vas deferens. Thus the electrophysiological investigations of neuroeff’ector transmission at the cellular level are often more ambiguous and less predictable in the former muscles. Nevertheless, studies on nerve-muscle preparations from a variety of smooth muscles are of importance not only from a comparative pharmacological viewpoint, but also as a contribution to a better understanding of the role of the nervous system in the control and regulation of smooth muscle in general.
KeywordsNerve Stimulation Intraluminal Pressure Uterine Horn Adrenergic Nerve Hypogastric Nerve
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brundin, J. 1965. Distribution and function of adrenergic nerves in the rabbit fallopian tube. Acta. Physiol.Scand., 66(Suppl. 259): 5–57.Google Scholar
- Csapo, Á.. 1970. The diagnostic significance of the intrauterine pressure. Obstet. Gynecol. Survey 25:403-435.Google Scholar
- Dominic, J. A. and Reinke, D. A. 1968. Extraluminal force transducer for in-vivo measurement of rabbit uterine contractile activity. Fertility and Sterility, 19:645–953.Google Scholar
- Huković, S., Rand, M. S., and Vanov, S. 1965. Observations on an isolated innervated preparation of rat urinary bladder. Br. J. Pharmacol., 24:178–188.Google Scholar
- Labay, P., Boyarsky, S., Duarte-Escalante, O., and Grimes, J. H. 1970. The scientific concept of ureteral innervation: will it become aurologic concept? J. Urology, 103:37–40.Google Scholar
- Marshall, J. M. 1969. The effects of ovarian hormones on the uterine response to adrenergic nerve stimula¬tion and to adrenergic amines. In: Progesterone: Its Regulatory Effect on the Myometrium, pp. 89–105. Ed. by Wolstenholme, G. E. W. and Knight, J. Ciba Foundation Study Group 34. J. and A. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
- Marshall, J. M. 1970. Adrenergic innervation of the female reproductive tract: Anatomy, physiology and pharmacology. Rev. Physiol., 62:7–67.Google Scholar
- Orlov, R. S. 1968. Nervous activation of smooth muscle cells of intact animals. Proc. Int. Union. Physiol. Sci., 6:146–147.Google Scholar
- Rüsse, M. W. and Marshall, J. M. 1970. Uterine response to adrenergic nerve stimulation in the guinea pig. Biol. Reprod, 3: 13–22.Google Scholar
- Setekleiv, J. 1964. Uterine motility of the estrogenized rabbit. III. Response to hypogastric and splanchnic nerve stimulation. Acta Physiol. Scand., 62:137–149.Google Scholar
- Vanov, S. 1965. Responses of the rat urinary bladder in situ to drugs and to nerve stimulation. Br. J. Pharmacol, 24:591–600.Google Scholar