Skip to main content

Conductivity Differences in the Cholesteric Textures

  • Chapter
Liquid Crystals and Ordered Fluids

Abstract

Both the focal conic and Grandjean textures can be characterized by a conductivity tensor with uniaxial symmetry. We have observed that the diagonal element corresponding to the conductivity in the special direction is ≈ 20% larger in the focal conic case. The film studied was a mixture of 80% N-(p-methoxybenzyli-dene)-p-butylaniline and 20% cholesteryl oleyl carbonate. The transformation to the focal conic texture was produced by the application of a dc voltage and the reverse transformation was induced by an ac voltage. At sufficiently low current levels, current does not perturb structure (at least to the extent that the optical and electrical properties are not altered). At higher levels, the measuring stimulus converts the film to an intermediate state and both textures approach the same current level since they are converted from their original symmetries into the same state. The conductivity differences observed are consistent with conductivity ratio data for the nematic component and the molecular distributions in the two textures. The influence of resistivity and temperature on the focal conic/Grandjean conductivity ratio is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. T. Svedberg, Ann. Physik 44, 1121 (1914).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O. Lehmann, Ann. d. Phys. 2, 676 (1900).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Châtelain, Bull. Soc. Fr. Miner. Crist. 66, 105 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. E. Adams, W. Haas and J. Wysocki, JCP 50, 2458 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Heilmeier, J. E. Goldmacher, Appl. Phys. Letters 13, 132 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Haas, J. E. Adams and J. B. Flannery, Phys. Rev. Letters 24, 577 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Helfrich, Appl. Phys. Letters, 531 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Diguet, F. Rondelez and G. Durand, C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris, L71B, 954 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eastman Liquid Crystal Products, JJ-14 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dir, G., Adams, J., Haas, W. (1974). Conductivity Differences in the Cholesteric Textures. In: Johnson, J.F., Porter, R.S. (eds) Liquid Crystals and Ordered Fluids. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2727-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2727-1_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-2729-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-2727-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics