Advertisement

Magnetic Relaxation of Poly-γ-Benzyl-L-Glutamate Solutions in Deuterochloroform

  • B. M. Fung
  • Thomas H. Martin

Abstract

For liquid and liquid crystalline solutions of poly-γ-benzyl-L-glutamate (PBLG) in deuterochloroform, the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) of deuterium in CDCl3 is strongly dependent upon temperature and concentration, while the proton T1 of PBLG has no concentration dependence and only a small temperature dependence. The data are analyzed based upon a model in which highly associated and bulk solvent molecules are in chemical exchange, and its validity is discussed.

Keywords

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum Solvent Molecule Magnetic Relaxation Pulse Nuclear Magnetic Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abragam, A., “The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism,” Oxford University Press (London, 1961).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr, H. Y., Purcell, E. M., Phys. Rev. 94, 630 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farrar, T. C., Becker, E. D., “Pulse and Fourier Transform NMR,” Academic Press (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fung, B. M., Gerace, M. J., Gerace, L. S., J. Phys. Chem. 74, 83 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerace, M. J., Fung, B. M., J. Chem. Phys. 53, 2984 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gill, D., Klein, M. P., Kotowycz, J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 90, 6870 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kimmich, R., Noack, F., Zeitschrift für Electrochemie, 75, 269 (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein, M. P., Gill, P., Kowtowycz, G., Chem. Phys. Letters 2, 677 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luz, Z., Meiboom, S., J. Chem. Phys. 40, 2687 (1964).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meiboom, S., Gill, D., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29, 688 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orwoll, R. D., Vold, R. L., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 93, 5335 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panar, M., Phillips, W., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 90, 3880 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson, C., Trans. Faraday Soc. 52, 571 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robinson, C., Ward, J. C., Beevers, R. B., Discussions Faraday Soc. 25, 29 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samulski, E. T., Tobolsky, A. V., Mol. Cryst. Liquid Cryst. 7, 433 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Samulski, E. T., Tobolsky, A. V.,Liquid Crys. and Ordered Fluids. (ed.: J. F. Johnson and R. S. Porter, Plenum Press, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Samulski, E. T., Tobolsky, A. V., Biopolymers 10, 1013 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samulski, E. T., Berendsen, H. J. C., J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3920 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sobajima, S., J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 23, 1070 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woessner, D. E., J. Chem. Phys. 37, 647 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zimmerman, J. R., Brittin, W. E., J. Phys. Chem. 61, 1328 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. M. Fung
    • 1
  • Thomas H. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations