Information Systems for Urban Problem Solvers

  • Manfred Kochen


Information systems are classified according to their role in problem solving. A new conceptualization of problem solving makes more precise the distinction between well-defined problems, which we try to solve, and ill-structured problems, with which we try to cope. For information systems to help with well-defined problems an analog to Shannon’s coding theorem is suggested. Eleven principles for the design of information systems to help with ill-structured problems are formulated.


Genetic Counselling Price Difference Urban Dweller Index Term Genetic Counselling Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Y. S. Chow and H. Robbins,Great Expectations and the Theory of Optimal Stopping, Houghton-Mifflin, New York (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Feller,An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Volume 1, Wiley, New York (1950), p. 129; D. C. Falconer, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Ronald Press, New York (1960).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. R. Fuchs, Health Care and the U.S. Economic System (draft), Presented at the Conference on Technology and Health Care Systems in the 1980’s, San Francisco, January 19, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Harrah, Communication:A Logical Model, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts ( 1963 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Kochen, Cognitive Mechanisms,IBM, Yorktown Heights, New York (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Kochen, Cognitive Learning Processes: An Explication, inArtificial Intelligence and Heuristic Programming, N. Findler and B. Meltzer, eds., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Kochen, On Determining Optimum Size of New Cities, inIs There an Optimum Level of PopulationF. Singer., McGraw-Hill, New York (1971), p. 364.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Kochen, Directory Design for Networks of Information and Referral Centers,Library Quarterly,42(1), 59–83 (1972); in Operations Research: Implications for Libraries, D. Swanson and A. Bookstein, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1972), p. 59.Google Scholar
  9. 8a.
    M. Kochen and D. Cason, A Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Information System to Help People Plan Their Families, inProc. of the Sixth Hawaii Int4. Conf on System Sciences, Urban and Regional Systems, Western Periodicals Co., Los Angeles (1973) p. 32.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    M. Kochen and J. Donohue (eds.),Information for the Community, American Library Association Press, Chicago, Illinois (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    N. Long et al., Information and Referral Centers: A Functional Analysis, Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, American Rehabilitation Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    J. Marschak, Problems in Information Economics, inManagement Controls, Bonini et al., McGraw-Hill, New York (1964), pp. 38–74.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    R. L. Meier,A Communication Theory of Urban Growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1962).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    A. Newell and H. A. Simon,Human Problem-Solving, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    G. W. Nutter, Duopoly, Oligopoly, and Emerging Competition,Southern Economic J.30(April), 342–82 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    L. J. Savage,The Foundations of Statistics, Wiley, New York (1954).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    V. Sessions and L. W. Sloan, URBANDOC/A Bibliographic Information System, City University of New York, New York (1971).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    G. J. Stigler, The Economics of Information,J. Political Economics,69(3), 213–225 (June 1961); Information in the Labor Market (1962), pp. 94–105.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    R. Tagliacozzo, M. Kochen, and W. Everett, The Use of Information by Decision-Makers in Public Service Organizations, inProc. Ann. Conf Am. Soc. for Information Science, Denver (1971).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    University of California—URISA, Proc. 4th Ann. Conf. on Urban Planning Information Systems and Programs, University of California, Berkeley (August 1966).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    H. Voos, Information Needs in Urban Areas: A Summary of Research inMethodology, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey (1969).Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    A. Weinberg, Science and Trans-Science,Science,177(4045), 211 (July 21, 1972); Minerva 10 ( April), 209 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    D. J. White,Decision Theory, Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago ( 1969 ).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    B. J. Whittemore and M. C. Yovits, Generalized Concept for the Analysis of Information,J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. (forthcoming), Presented at NATO Advanced Study Institute, August 1972; M. C. Yovits and R. L. Ernst, in People and Information, H. B. Pepinsky, ed., Pergamon Press, New York (1969).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    L. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets,Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 25.
    J. M. Ziman, Information, Communication, Knowledge, Nature 224 (October 25, 1969); reprinted in Introduction to Information Science, T. Saracevic., Bowker Publishing, New York (1970), pp. 76–84.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred Kochen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations