Flux Flow of Pure and Dirty Superconductors

  • Y. Muto
  • S. Shinzawa
  • N. Kobayashi
  • K. Noto


Transport properties in the flux-flow regime such as flux-flow resistance, the Hall effect, and the Ettingshausen effect are very interesting because they give valuable information on the dynamic behavior of the superconducting order parameter. Pure Nb and V metals and NbMo and NbTa alloys were used as pure and dirty samples, respectively. Results on pure Nb, the NbMo alloy system, and the Nb80Ta20 alloy were reported earlier.1,2 Emphasis in these reports was placed on the quantitative comparison of various experimental transport phenomena in higher fields near H c2 with microscopic theories based on the time-dependent Ginzburg—Landau equation. As described in Ref. 2, while the results of the Ettingshausen effect experiments can be well accounted for in accordance with Maki’s microscopic theory, observations of the flux-flow resistance, the Hall angle, and the thermal conductivity are in quantitative disagreement with theory. In this paper we describe our study of the flux-flow resistance of pure V and the NbTa alloy system. While the experimental behavior of the flux-flow resistance has not yet been established, theoretical work has shown considerable progress since the report in Ref. 2.


Flux Flow Superconducting Order Parameter Anomalous Term Pure Versus Residual Resistance Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Y. Muto, K. Mori, and K. Noto, in Proc. Int. Conf Science of Superconductivity, Stanford, 1969, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1971), p. 362.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Noto, Y. Muto, and K. Mori, in Proc. 12th Intern. Conf. Low Temp. Phys., 1970,Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo (1971), pp. 399 and 401.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Caroli and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. 164, 591 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.S. Thompson, Phys. Rev. B 1, 327 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Takayama and H. Ebisawa, Progr. Theor. Phys. 44, 1450 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Takayama and K. Maki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1445 (1972), and private communication.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.T. Sekula and R.H. Kemohan, Phys. Rev. B 5, 904 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. Maki, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto) 41, 902 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Maki and A. Houghton, Phys. Rev. B 4, 847 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Radebaugh and P.H. Keesom, Phys. Rev. 149, 217 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Usui, T. Ogasawara, and K: Yasukochi, Phys. Lett. 27A, 108 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Muto
    • 1
  • S. Shinzawa
    • 1
  • N. Kobayashi
    • 1
  • K. Noto
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Iron, Steel and Other MetalsTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations