Advertisement

Electric Potential Near a Superconducting Boundary

  • M. L. Yu
  • J. E. Mercereau

Abstract

In the nonequilibrium region close to a current-carrying superconducting—normal (S/N) interface Rieger et al.1 proposed a concept of separate chemical potentials for quasiparticles and pairs. From a time-dependent Ginzburg—Landau (GL) approach they found that the difference in pair potential µ p and electron potential µ e depends on the divergence of the supercurrent j s in the following way:
$${{\mu }_{p}}\,-\,{{\mu }_{e\,}}\,=\,(m{{\zeta }^{2}}/4e\tau {{\left| \psi \right|}^{2}})\,\nabla \,\centerdot \,{{j}_{s}}$$
(1)
where τ is the GL relaxation time, ξ is the coherence distance, and ψ is the amplitude of the condensed phase. It was also found that µ P remains constant even near a S/N boundary where ∇·j s is nonzero. In a recent paper2 we reported experimental evidence for this concept and found that a superconducting voltage probe measures the pair chemical potential and a normal voltage probe measures the quasiparticle chemical potential. These measurements were made with tantalum thin-film microcircuits fabricated with photoetch and selective anodization techniques. The transition temperature of these films is thickness dependent2 and the relative transition temperature of different regions was determined by the respective thicknesses, which in turn were controlled by the anodization process.

Keywords

Critical Current Dynamic Resistance Boundary Potential Voltage Probe Chemical Potential Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T.J. Rieger, D.J. Scalapino, and J.E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1787 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.L. Yu and J.E. Mercereau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1117 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.K. Kirschman, H.A. Notarys, and J.E. Mercereau, Phys. Lett. 34A, 209 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.E. Friebertshauser, H.A. Notarys, and J.E. Mercereau, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 13, 1670 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Meyer and G.V. Minnigerode, Phys. Lett. 38A, 529 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Yu
    • 1
  • J. E. Mercereau
    • 1
  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations