The Role of Composition in Ultrafine-Grain Ceramics

  • M. H. Leipold
  • E. R. Blosser
Part of the Sagamore Army Materials Research Conference Proceedings book series (SAMC, volume 15)


The importance of composition and impurities to the behavior of ultrafine-grain ceramics is discussed with emphasis on: (1) significance of large grain boundary area per unit volume; (2) nature and distribution of impurities; (3) source and elimination of impurities; and (4) analysis of impurities.

The importance of large grain boundary area per unit volume in ultrafine-grain ceramics is considered in light of our present lack of data and models for the extent, structure, and composition of any grain boundaries in ceramics. However, much evidence exists suggesting that these boundaries occupy a large volume and behave markedly differently than the bulk lattice, which would have a substantial effect in ultrafine-grain materials.

The nature and distribution of impurities in such ceramics is discussed, emphasizing the importance of anions and their especial importance in fine-grain material. These anions are expected to have large and varied effects, as indicated by theory and by meager experimental data, especially with reference to densification during fabrication. The sources of impurities in ultrafine-grain ceramics, primarily anions, are discussed in relation to the surfaces of the fine powders from which these ceramics are produced. Possible means of purification of such powders before and during further processing are presented, again with emphasis on the form and location of the impurities in the powders.

Analytical procedures for the determination of the quantity and distribution of impurities in such ceramics are discussed, along with the reasons for the long neglect of anion impurities, emphasizing the previous lack of suitable analytical techniques. Consideration is given to the success of mass spectroscopy, and its associated sensitivity, sample preparation, and handling problems.


Impurity Distribution Boundary Volume Beryllium Oxide Polycrystalline Ceramic Chemical Analysis Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Carneglia, S. C., “Petch Relations in Single Phase Oxide Ceramics,” J. Amer. Ceram. Soc., 48 (1965), 580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spriggs, R. M. and Vasilos, T., “Effect of Grain Size on Transverse Bend Strength of Alumina and Magnesia,” ibid, 46 (1963), 224–28.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bentle, G. G. and Kneifel, R. M., “Brittle and Plastic Behavior of Hot Pressed BeO,” ibid, (1965), 570.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wuench, B. J. and Vasilos, T., “Origin of Grain Boundary Diffusion in MgO,” ibid, 49 (1966), 433.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leipold, M. H., “Impurity Distribution in MgO,” ibid, 46 (1966), 398.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leipold, M. H., “Addenda to Impurity Distribution in MgO,” ibid, 47 (1967), 628.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Obst, K. H., Horn, H. C. and Munchberg, W., “Berrteilung von Sintermagnesiten mit Mikroskopie und Elextronenstrahl—Mikroanalyse,” Sonderdruck ans Tonind-Ztg., 90 (1966), 415.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fine, M. E., “Precipitation in Ceramics,” Proc. of the OAR Res. Appl. Conference (April 1966).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Socha, A. J. and Leipold, M. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 49 (1965), 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blosser, E. R., “Development of Chemical Analysis Techniques for Advanced Materials,” Annual Report Accession #N68–17382, Final Report,in print, NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leipziger, F. D., “Development of Chemical Analysis Techniques for Advanced Materials Research Program,” Accession N66–26248, NASA Scientific and Technical Information Facility, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rice, R. W., “Production of Transparent MgO at Moderate Temperature and Pressures,” Paper 5w62, Annual Meeting Amer. Ceram. Soc., Abstract in Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc., 41 (1962), 27.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rhodes, W. H., et al.,Report CR-67–01(F), Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Adams, R. B. and Stuart, W. I., “Effect of Adsorbed Sulfate and Fluoride on the Density of Hot-Pressed Beryllium Oxide,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 50 (1967), 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chapman, A. T., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga., Private communication (June 1968).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scholze, H., “Water in Glass Structure,” Glass Industry, 40 (1959), 301.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kirklin, P. W., Auzins, Peteris and Wertz, J. E., “A Hydrogen Containing Trapped Hole in Magnesium Oxide,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 26 (1965), 1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson, P. J., Horlock, R. F. and Oliver, J. E., “Interaction of Water with Magnesium Oxide Surface,” Trans. Faraday Soc., 61 (1965), 2754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rice, R. W. and Hunt, J. G., “Identifying Parameters of Hot Extrusions,” NASA Contract NAS 7–276, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Attention: AFSS-A, Washington, D.C. (May 1967).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leipold, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H., “Hot-Pressed High Purity Polycrystalline MgO,” Bull. Am. Ceram. Soc., 45 (1966), 281.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leipold, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H., “Fabrication and Characterization of Isostatically Hot-Pressed MgO,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 51 (1968), 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Syracuse University Press Syracuse, New York 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. H. Leipold
    • 1
  • E. R. Blosser
    • 2
  1. 1.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA
  2. 2.Battelle Memorial InstituteColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations