Some Definitional, Conceptual, and Public Policy Issues
  • Saleem A. Shah
Part of the Perspectives in Law & Psychology book series (PILP, volume 1)


The administration of criminal justice and related coercive interventions in the lives of citizens present most starkly the many important issues concerning the proper balance between use of the state’s authority and power and the rights of individuals. We see exemplified here, as well as in “civil” commitments of the mentally ill, the perennial and fundamental question: Under what circumstances is the state justified in using its power to infringe the liberty of the individual (Allen, 1964; Hart, 1963)?


Mental Illness Police Power Civil Commitment Public Policy Issue Insanity Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, F. A. The borderline of criminal justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  2. Bord, R. J. Rejection of the mentally ill: Continuities and further developments. Social Problems, 1971, 18, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brakel, S. J., & Rock, R. S. The mentally disabled and the law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Broderick, A. Justice in the books or justice in action: An institutional approach to involuntary hospitalization for mental illness. Catholic University Law Review, 1971, 20, 547.Google Scholar
  5. Chambers, D. L. Alternatives to civil commitment of the mentally ill: Practical guides and constitutional imperatives. Michigan Law Review, 1971, 70, 1107; 1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gulevich, G., & Bourne, P. Mental illness and violence. In D. Daniels, M. Gilula, & F. Ochberg (Eds.), Violence and the struggle for existence. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Hart, H. L. A. Law, liberty, and morality. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, J., Goldstein, J., & Dershowitz, A. M. Psychoanalysis, psychiatry, and law. New York: Free Press, 1967. Pp. 526–535.Google Scholar
  9. Mulvihill, D., &Tumin, M. 12 crimes of violence. A staff report to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, 1969. Pp. 639-667.Google Scholar
  10. Nunnally, J. Popular conceptions of mental health: Their development and change. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston, 1961. P. 51.Google Scholar
  11. Phillips, D. L. Rejection: A possible consequence of seeking help for mental disorders. American Sociological Review, 1963, 28, 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips, D. L. Rejection of the mentally ill: The influence of behavior and sex. American Sociological Review, 1964, 29, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. The Predident’s Report on Occupational Safety and Health. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
  14. Stone, A. A. Mental health and law: A system in transition. National Institute of Mental Health, DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 75-176. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Voas, E. Alcohol as an underlying factor in behavior leading to fatal highway crashes. In M. E. Chafetz (Ed.), Research on alcoholism: Clinical problems and special populations. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1973. P. 324.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saleem A. Shah
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Studies of Crime and DelinquencyNational Institute of Mental HealthRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations