Some Directions for a Cognitive Psychology of Instruction

  • Robert Glaser
  • James W. Pellegrino
  • Alan M. Lesgold
Part of the Nato Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)


Modern cognitive psychology is today’s dominant theoretical force in behavioral science. More than ever before, complex mental behaviors are being investigated in rigorous scientific ways. However, while cognitive psychology is becoming increasingly mature in its attempts to model the complexity of human performance, it is a fledgling in the domain of applications to education and instruction. At the present time, cognitive psychology’s findings and techniques have not significantly influenced teaching practices, instructional processes, nor the design of conditions for learning.


Cognitive Development Instructional Design Knowledge Structure Phonological Processing Phonological Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. On putting apples into bottles - A problem of polysemy. Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 167 - 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobrow, D. G. Natural language input for a computer problem-solving system. In M. Minsky (Ed.), Semantic information processing. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Bower, G. H. Mental imagery and associative learning. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. S. Toward a theory of instruction. New York; W. W. Norton and Company, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. J., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.Google Scholar
  6. DISTAR Reading Program (2nd ed.). Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Estes, W. K. Learning theory and intelligence. American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 740–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estes, W. K. (Ed.) Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 1 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Gagne, R. M. The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Gagne, R. M. Essentials of learning for instruction. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, R. Components of a psychology of instruction: Toward a science of design. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Greeno, J. G. Nature of problem-solving abilities. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Greeno, J. G. Cognitive objectives of instruction: Knowledge for solving problems and answering, questions. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976. (a)Google Scholar
  14. Greeno, J. G. Indefinite goals in well-structured problems. Psychological Review, 1976, 83, 479–491. (b)Google Scholar
  15. Hayes-Roth, B. Evolution of cognitive structures and processses. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 260–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. The prominence of lexical information in memory representations of meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977, 16, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hebb, D. O. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley, 1949.Google Scholar
  18. Hunt, E. B. Concept learning: An information processing problem. New York: Wiley, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landa, L. N. Algorithmization in learning and instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. Lesgold, A. M., & Goldman, S. R. Encoding uniqueness and the imagery mnemonic in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lesgold, A. M., McCormick, C., & Golinkoff, R. M. Imagery training and children’s prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lockhart, R. S., Craik, F. I., & Jacoby, L. Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
  23. Minsky, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.) The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
  24. Neimark, E. D., & Santa, J. L. Thinking and concept attainment. Annual Review of Psychology, 1975, 26, 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
  26. Paige, J. M., & Simon, H. A. Cognitive processes in solving algebra word problems. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method and theory. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
  27. Pellegrino, J., & Glaser, R. Cognitive components of individual differences. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1977.Google Scholar
  28. Resnick, L. B. (Ed.) The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976. (a)Google Scholar
  29. Resnick, L. B. Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. In D. Klahr (Ed.), Cognition and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976. (b)Google Scholar
  30. Resnick, L. B., & Glaser, R. Problem solving and intelligence. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.Google Scholar
  31. Rumelhart, D. C. Toward an interactive model of reading (Technical Report No. 56 ). San Diego: University of California, Center for Human Information Processing, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. Schank, R., & Abelson, R. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
  33. Swinney, D. A., & Hakes, D. T. Effects of prior context upon lexical access during sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976, 15, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winograd, T. Frame representations and the declarative-procedural controversy. In D. C. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  35. Wolff, P., & Levin, J. R. The role of overt activity in children’s imagery production. Child Development, 1972, 43, 537–547.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wright, P. Presenting technical information: A survey of research findings. Instructional Science, 1977, 6, 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Glaser
    • 1
  • James W. Pellegrino
    • 1
  • Alan M. Lesgold
    • 1
  1. 1.Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations