Advertisement

A Functional Analysis of Reading Disability: The Utilization of Intraword Redundancy by Good and Poor Readers

  • G. Scheerer-Neumann
Part of the Nato Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 5)

Abstract

Research on reading disability has expanded considerably in the past twenty-five years. Even though scientists from different fields are working at the problem, the questions asked are surprisingly similar. Neurologists, psychologists, and educational researchers are trying to discover the basic causes of failure to learn how to read. The hypotheses set forth depend, of course, on the scientific background of the researchers. Thus, inheritance (Critchley, 1970), minimal brain dysfunction (Wender, 1971), perceptual deficits (Malmquist, 1958) and inadequate teaching methods (Schlee, 1976), to name but a few, have all been offered as hypotheses of the basic origin of reading disability.

Keywords

Word Recognition Reading Ability Poor Reader Reading Disability Good Reader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Notes

  1. 1.
    Wolff, P. Verarbeitung der Identitäts- und Positionsinformation tachistoskopisch gebotener verbaler Reize. Dissertation, Bochum, in preparation.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scheerer-Neumann, G. Formvergleich und Namensvergleich bei leseschwachen Kindern. Paper presented at the 19 Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, March 1977.Google Scholar

References

  1. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, G. P. Does perceptual training improve reading? Academic Therapy, 1973, 9, 41–45.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, J. Successive stages in word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and performance V. London, New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. Critchley, M. The dyslexic child. London: W. Heinemann Medical Books Limited, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Geyer, J. J. Comprehensive and partial models related to the reading process. Reading Research Quarterly, 1972, 7, 541–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson, E. J. The ontogeny of reading. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Haber, R. N. (Eds.). Information-processing approaches to visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffmann, J. Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchungen über Leseleistungen von Schulkindern. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 1927, 58, 325–388.Google Scholar
  9. Linder, M., & Grissemann, H. Zürcher Lesetest. Bern: Hans Huber, 1967.Google Scholar
  10. Malmquist, E. Factors related to reading disability in the first grade of elementary school. Dissertation, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Mason, M. Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mewhort, D. J. K. Sequential redundancy and letter spacing as determinants of tachistoscopic recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1966, 20, 435–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
  14. Schlee, J. Legasthenieforschung am Ende? München: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Scholz, R. Informationsverarbeitung bei Legasthenikern: Visuelle und phonetische Codierung. Unveröffentlichte Diplom-Arbeit, Bochum, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. The role of syllables in perceptual processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 5, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wallach, M. A. Perceptual recognition of approximations to English in relation to spelling achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963, 54, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wender, P. H. Minimal brain dysfunction in children. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Scheerer-Neumann
    • 1
  1. 1.Arbeitseinheit Kognitive PsychologieRuhr UniversitätBochumFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations