Advertisement

Structure and Use of Verbs of Motion

  • W. J. M. Levelt
  • R. Schreuder
  • E. Hoenkamp
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 4b)

Abstract

This article outlines in a summary fashion aims, present status, and further plans of a research programme on the structure and use of motion verbs.

Keywords

Motion Pattern Semantic Representation Proper Motion Perceptual Event Human Locomotion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, H. H. &Chase, W. G. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 472–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Collitz, Klara H. Verbs of motion in their semantic divergence. Language Monographs, 8, March 1931.Google Scholar
  3. Gruber, J. S. Studies in lexical relations, 1965, unpublished doctoral dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar
  4. Heider, F. An experimental study of apparent behaviour. American Journal of Psychology, 1944, 57, 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoenkamp, E. C. M. A computer registration of human locomotion. Report 76FU02, Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Nijmegen, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Jaarsveld, H. van. Het gebruiken van bewegingswerk-woorden, Unpublished doctoral thesis, Nijmegen,1973.Google Scholar
  7. Jackendoff, R. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 1976, Vol. 7 nr. 1, 89–150.Google Scholar
  8. Johansson, 0. Visual perception of biological motion and its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics,1973, Vol. 14, no. 2, 201–211.Google Scholar
  9. Levelt, W. J. M. Motion braking and the perception of causality. In: Michotte, A., Causalit é, permanence et réalité phénoménales, Louvain, 1962.Google Scholar
  10. Michotte, A. La perception de la causalit é, Louvain, 1946.Google Scholar
  11. Michotte, A. Causalit é, permanence et réalité phéhomén ales. Louvain, 1962.Google Scholar
  12. Michotte, A. The perception of causality, London, Methuen, 1963.Google Scholar
  13. Miller, G. A. A psychological method to investigate verbal concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychol ogy , 1969, 6, 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, G. A. English verbs of motion: a case study in semantics and lexical memory. In: Melton, A. W. &Martin, E. (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. Washington, Winston, 1972.Google Scholar
  15. Schank, R. C. Conceptual dependency: a theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psycholog sssss1972, 3, 552–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schank, R. C. Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. In: Schank, R. C. &Colby, M. C., Computer models of thought and langu age , San Francisco, Freeman, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Schreuder, R. Een lijst van Nederlandse bewigingswerkwoorden, Rapport 76FU01 Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Nijmegen, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Seuren, P. A. M. Echo, een studie in negatie, to be published, 1976.Google Scholar
  19. Stillings, N. A. Meaning rules and systems of inference for verbs of transfer and possession. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 1975, 14, 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Uit den Boogaart, P. C. Woordfrequenties, Utrecht, Oosthoek, Scheltema &Holkema, 1975.Google Scholar
  21. Verkuyl, H. J. Thematic Relations and the Semantic Representation of Verbs Expressing Change, Report 76FU07, Dept. of Psychology, Univ. of Nijmegen, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. J. M. Levelt
    • 1
  • R. Schreuder
    • 1
  • E. Hoenkamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Nijmegen UniversityNetherlands

Personalised recommendations