“Environmental Invariants” and the Prosodic Aspects of Reversed Speech
The study we are going to present is part of a larger program which explores the relationship between prosody and syntax in the perception of continuous speech. Our studies to date have led us to the conclusion that the relationship is an interactive one. In this paper, we will be concerned with the possibility that some prosodic features may nevertheless be perceived independently of syntax.
KeywordsDisagreement Score Continuous Speech Environmental Invariant Prosodic Feature Pitch Variation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abercrombie, D. (1965). Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London:O.U.P.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J.A., Bever, T.G. and Garrett, M.F. (1974). The Psycho logy of Language. New York: McGraw-hill.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J.J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
- Kirakowski, J. and Myers, T. (1975). The effect of intonation on message intelligibility. Paper presented at the Spring Meeting of the British Acoustical Society, Nottingham.Google Scholar
- Laver, J. (1970). The production of speech. In Lyons (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics. Middlesex: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, P. (1965). On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word, 21, 40–54.Google Scholar
- Rees, M. (1975). The domain of isochrony. Edinburgh UniversityDepartment of Linguistics. Work in Progress, 8, 14–28.Google Scholar