Advertisement

Sentence Comprehension Processes in the Pre-Schooler

  • Donald J. Foss
  • Randolph G. Bias
  • Prentice Starkey
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 4b)

Abstract

Among the goals of developmental psycholinguistics are these three: to construct a description of the tacit knowledge of language that children have at various points in their development; to describe the processes that children use in producing and comprehending sentences; and to describe the principles of change or development that govern the first two. It is obvious that these are interdependent tasks.

Keywords

Target Word Relative Clause Sentence Type Nursery School Main Clause 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, R. (1973). Structural characteristics of clause-containing sentences and imitation by children and adults• J. Psycholing. Rsh., 2, 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, H.D. (1971). Children’s comprehension of relativized English sentences. Child Development, 42,1923–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cairns, H.S., and Kamerman, J. (1975). Lexical information processing during sentence comprehension. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 14, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Foss, D.J. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision time. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 8, 457–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foss, D.J. (1970). Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension. J. Verb . Learn. Verb. Behav., 9, 699–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foss, D.J. and Swinney, D.A. (1973). On the psychological reality of the phoneme: Perception, identification and consciousness. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 12, 246–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaer, E. (1969). Children’s understanding and production of sentences. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 8, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hakes, D.T. (1971)• Does verb structure affect sentence comprehension? Percept. & Psychophys., 10, 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hakes, D.T. & Foss, D.J. (1970). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure revisited. Percept. & Psychophys., 8, 4l3–4l6.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, R.J. (1975). Children’s comprehension of complex sentences. J. Exp. Chil. Psychol., 19, 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. Moore (ed.) Cognition and language development. N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Morton, J. and Long, J. (1976). Effect of word transitional probability on phoneme identification. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 15, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Newell, A, (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W.G. Chase (ed.) Visual Information processing, N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Sheldon, A. (1972)• The acquisition of relative clauses in English. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Austin, The University of Texas.Google Scholar
  16. Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav., 13, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slobin, D.I. (1971)-Development psycholinguistics. In W.O. Dingwall (ed.) A survey of linguistic science. College Park, Md: Linguistics program/University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, M.D. (1974)• Relative clause formation between 29 and 36 months: A Preliminary Report. In E.V. Clark (ed.) Papers and reports on child language development, No. 8 Stanford: Committee on Linguistics.Google Scholar
  19. Wanner, E. and Maratsos, M. (1974)• An augmented transition net work model of relative clause comprehension. Unpublished paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  20. Woods, W.A. (1973). An experimental parsing system for transition network grammars. In R. Rustin (ed.) Natural Language Processing. N.Y.: Algorithmics Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald J. Foss
    • 1
  • Randolph G. Bias
    • 1
  • Prentice Starkey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinUSA

Personalised recommendations