Advertisement

Biofeedback from the Perspectives of Cybernetics and Systems Science

  • James Anliker
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 2)

Abstract

The great French mathematician Laplace, whose monumental Mécanique celeste summarized the work of several generations of mathematicians on the behavior of celestial bodies under the influence of gravitational forces, captured the imagination of scientists and philosophers with his famous pronouncement that

“An intelligence knowing all of the forces acting in nature at a given instant, as well as the momentary positions of all things in the universe, would be able to comprehend in one single formula the motions of the largest bodies as well as the lightest atoms, provided that its intellect were sufficiently powerful to subject all data to analysis; to it (i. e., to such an intelligence) nothing would be uncertain, the future as well as the past would be present to its eyes.”

Keywords

System Science Behavioral Control Feedforward Control Feedback Control System Fixed Interval Schedule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anliker, J. E. Reversal of discriminations of temporal schedules of re- inforcement. Unpublished thesis, Harvard University, 1955.Google Scholar
  2. Bertalanffy, L. von. General system theory. New York: George Braziller, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. Bryson, A. E. Control theory for random systems. Stanford: Stanford University Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Report Number 447, 1972.Google Scholar
  4. Craik, K. J. W. The nature of explanation. Cambridge: University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
  5. Gasnier, A., & Mayer, A. Recherches sur la regulation de la nutrition. III. Mecanismes regulateurs de la nutrition et intensite du metabolisme. Annales de Physiologie, 1939, 15, 186–194.Google Scholar
  6. Gilbert, E. G. Controllability and observability in multi-variable control systems. Journal Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., series A, Control, 1963, 1, 138–151.Google Scholar
  7. Guthrie, E. R., & Horton, G. P. Cats in a puzzle box. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1946.Google Scholar
  8. Hayek, F. A. The sensory order. Chicago: University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  9. Homme, L. E. Perspectives in psychology, XXIV: Control of coverants,the operants of the mind. Psychological Record, 1965, 15, 501–511.Google Scholar
  10. Kalman, R. E. On the general theory of control systems. ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  11. IFAC Moscow Congress (Vol. 1). Washington, D. C.: Butterworth,1960.Google Scholar
  12. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1943, 5, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miller, N. Learning of visceral and glandular responses. Science, 1969, 163, 434–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Planck, M. Where is science going? New York: W. W. Norton, 1932.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B. F. The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts, 1938.Google Scholar
  16. Skinner, B. F. Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.Google Scholar
  17. Szentagothal, J., & Arbib, M. A. Conceptual models of neural organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Wiener, N. Cybernetics. Cambridge: Technology Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Anliker
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnology DivisionNASA Ames Research CenterUSA

Personalised recommendations